Reconstruction Agreement

Reconstruction Agreement is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 1 cases from 2008 to 2008.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Reconstruction Agreement, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law Firm	Cases	Success Rate	Key Lawyers	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP0.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Tan Shao Tong (1 cases) Leung Yew Kwong (1 cases)	Clifford Development v Commissioner of Stamp Duties: Stamp Duty Exemption & Reconstruction Agreements(Oct 2008)
IRAS100.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Liu Hern Kuan (1 cases) Quek Hui Ling (1 cases)	Clifford Development v Commissioner of Stamp Duties: Stamp Duty Exemption & Reconstruction Agreements(Oct 2008)

Leading lawyers practicing in Reconstruction Agreement, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Lawyer	Cases	Success Rate	Expertise Level	Recent Cases
Tan Shao Tong0.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Experienced70% relevance score	Clifford Development v Commissioner of Stamp Duties: Stamp Duty Exemption & Reconstruction Agreements(Oct 2008)
Liu Hern Kuan100.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Experienced70% relevance score	Clifford Development v Commissioner of Stamp Duties: Stamp Duty Exemption & Reconstruction Agreements(Oct 2008)
Quek Hui Ling100.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Experienced70% relevance score	Clifford Development v Commissioner of Stamp Duties: Stamp Duty Exemption & Reconstruction Agreements(Oct 2008)
Leung Yew Kwong0.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Experienced70% relevance score	Clifford Development v Commissioner of Stamp Duties: Stamp Duty Exemption & Reconstruction Agreements(Oct 2008)

Displaying 1 most recent judgments out of 1 total cases

No.	Title	Court	Decision Date	Outcomes
1	Clifford Development v Commissioner of Stamp Duties: Stamp Duty Exemption & Reconstruction Agreements	High Court	05 Oct 2008	The applicant was not entitled to the stamp duty relief claimed.