Harry Elias

Harry Elias is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 28 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in collective sales and strata title law. Their track record shows a 32.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 18 complex cases, representing 64% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Harry Elias has demonstrated expertise across 105 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	15 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 15 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	8 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	7 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice16% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Motor Vehicle Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpleader	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money Laundering	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recipient liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Economic Duress	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Third party liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tax Evasion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Open justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Acquisition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Acquisition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Supplemental Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sovereign Immunity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Software Piracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Search Warrants	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied Undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Customs Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transportation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Harry Elias has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Harry Elias has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 23 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	23 cases	82% of cases	Pacific & Orient Insurance v Motor Insurers’ Bureau: Liability for Singapore Judgment(Oct 2012) Shafeeg bin Salim Talib v Helmi bin Ali: Striking Out & Forum Non Conveniens(Jul 2011) Zage v Ho: Knowing Receipt, Breach of Trust, and Solicitor Misappropriation(Feb 2010)
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	4 cases	14% of cases	Tanaka Lumber v Datuk Tufail: Trust, Fiduciary Duty & Conspiracy in Timber Trading Dispute(Oct 2015) Foo Jong Long Dennis v Ang Yee Lim: Implied Undertaking & Use of Disclosed Documents(Jan 2015) Raffles Town Club v Lim Eng Hock Peter: Breach of Directors' Duties & Conspiracy(Oct 2012)
Eversheds Harry Elias LLP	1 cases	4% of cases	Public Prosecutor v BDA: Rape, Outrage of Modesty - Son Accused of Sexually Assaulting Mother(Mar 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Harry Elias's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.7
Complex Cases: 18 (64%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	4%
Lost	105.8 parties avg	5.8	36%
Partial	86.4 parties avg	6.4	29%
Won	914.5 parties avg	14.5	32%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	66.0 parties avg	6.0
2001	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2003	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2004	29.7 parties avg	9.7
2006	26.7 parties avg	6.7
2007	227.0 parties avg	27.0
2008	55.5 parties avg	5.5
2009	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	35.0 parties avg	5.0
2015	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Harry Elias's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(4%)	4%
Lost	10(36%)	36%
Partial	8(29%)	29%
Won	9(32%)	32%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,700,913.56	264,350.9714 cases	14

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	6 231	Lost: 2 cases (33.3%) Partial: 3 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (16.7%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2008	5 311	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2015	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 28 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v BDA: Rape, Outrage of Modesty - Son Accused of Sexually Assaulting Mother 27 Mar 2018 BDA (Defendant)Lost	27 Mar 2018	BDA (Defendant): ConvictionThe Accused was convicted of rape and outrage of modesty and sentenced to 16 years’ imprisonment and 18 strokes of the cane.
2	Tanaka Lumber v Datuk Tufail: Trust, Fiduciary Duty & Conspiracy in Timber Trading Dispute 22 Oct 2015 Datuk Haji Mohammad Tufail bin Mahmud (Defendant)Dismissed	22 Oct 2015	Datuk Haji Mohammad Tufail bin Mahmud (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDatuk Tufail's counterclaim was dismissed because he failed to discharge his burden of proof.
3	Foo Jong Long Dennis v Ang Yee Lim: Implied Undertaking & Use of Disclosed Documents 28 Jan 2015 Another (Defendant)Lost	28 Jan 2015	Another (Defendant): Appeal against ruling on preliminary issueThe Defendants appealed against the court's ruling on the preliminary issue.
4	Raffles Town Club v Lim Eng Hock Peter: Breach of Directors' Duties & Conspiracy 30 Oct 2012 William Tan (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	30 Oct 2012	William Tan (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal Allowed in PartWilliam Tan's claim of conspiracy against Margaret Tung and Lin Jian Wei was partially allowed.
5	Pacific & Orient Insurance v Motor Insurers’ Bureau: Liability for Singapore Judgment 03 Oct 2012 Pacific & Orient Insurance Co Bhd (formerly known as Pacific & Orient Insurance Co Sdn Bhd) (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	03 Oct 2012	Pacific & Orient Insurance Co Bhd (formerly known as Pacific & Orient Insurance Co Sdn Bhd) (Defendant, Applicant): Application DismissedThe application by Pacific & Orient Insurance in OS 808 is dismissed.
6	Cherie Hearts v G8 Education: Business Acquisition, Repudiatory Breach & Specific Performance 08 Apr 2012 G8 Education Ltd (Defendant)Won	08 Apr 2012	G8 Education Ltd (Defendant): Specific performance of the Business Acquisition Contract grantedPlaintiffs' claim dismissed with costs. Specific performance of the Business Acquisition Contract granted to the defendant. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Shafeeg bin Salim Talib v Helmi bin Ali: Striking Out & Forum Non Conveniens 06 Jul 2011 Helmi bin Ali bin Salim bin Talib (Defendant, Respondent)Won	06 Jul 2011	Helmi bin Ali bin Salim bin Talib (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the decision of the Assistant Registrar was allowed.
8	Zage v Ho: Knowing Receipt, Breach of Trust, and Solicitor Misappropriation 09 Feb 2010 Kaori Kathleen Zage (Appellant)Partial	09 Feb 2010	Kaori Kathleen Zage (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; DeFred is liable to account to the appellants as trustee for the sum transferred in the Cash Cheque ie, $270,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Ng Eng Ghee v Mamata Kapildev Dave: Costs Allocation in Collective Sale Dispute 06 Jul 2009 Ong Sioe Hong (Appellant)Partial	06 Jul 2009	Ong Sioe Hong (Appellant): Partial costs awardedEntitled to 60% of costs for the Second Tranche of the Horizon Board proceedings, the High Court proceedings and CA 119/2008 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Zage v Rasif: Dishonest Assistance & Knowing Receipt in Money Laundering via Precious Stones 29 Dec 2008 Kaori Kathleen Zage (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Dec 2008	Kaori Kathleen Zage (Plaintiff): Claims against fourth and fifth defendants dismissed; judgment against sixth defendant.Claims against Ho Chi Kwong and Jewels DeFred Pte Ltd dismissed. Judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs against Lim Soon Kiang for US$583,358, being 94.09% of US$620,000. The judgment sum is to be reduced by any sum granted to the Plaintiffs (from the money transferred by Tran) in or after the conclusion of the disposal inquiry. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Tan Siew Tian v Lee Khek Ern Ken: Collective Sale Application & Subsidiary Proprietor Definition under Land Titles (Strata) Act 23 Jun 2008 Ong Wen Hui (Appellant)Won	23 Jun 2008	Ong Wen Hui (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs here and below (both the High Court and STB proceedings) and with the usual consequential orders. The decisions of the High Court and the STB were set aside and the matter was remitted to the STB for further consideration. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Registrar of Vehicles v Komoco Motors: Judicial Review & ARF Calculation 07 May 2008 Komoco Motors Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	07 May 2008	Komoco Motors Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay costs.
13	Republic of the Philippines v Maler Foundation: Sovereign Immunity & Interpleader Proceedings 23 Mar 2008 Republic of the Philippines (Appellant)Lost	23 Mar 2008	Republic of the Philippines (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Republic of the Philippines was ordered to bear 50% of the costs of the respondents in the appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Tan Siew Tian v Lee Khek Ern Ken: Collective Sale Compliance Under Land Titles (Strata) Act 18 Mar 2008 Ong Wen Hui (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	18 Mar 2008	Ong Wen Hui (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe plaintiffs' appeal against the Strata Titles Board's dismissal of their application was dismissed.
15	Tan Joy Hon v Sassoon Samuel: Collective Sale Agreement Validity & Authority Dispute 05 Nov 2007 Mah Kai Leong (Defendant)Won	05 Nov 2007	Mah Kai Leong (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe originating summons was dismissed, and the plaintiffs were ordered to pay indemnity costs to all nine defendants.
16	Komoco Motors v Registrar of Vehicles: Judicial Review of ARF Assessment 16 May 2007 Komoco Motors Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	16 May 2007	Komoco Motors Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application GrantedApplication for judicial review granted in favor of Komoco Motors Pte Ltd.
17	WestLB AG v Philippine National Bank: Sovereign Immunity & Commercial Transactions 26 Dec 2006 Republic of the Philippines (Defendant)Lost	26 Dec 2006	Republic of the Philippines (Defendant): LostThe Republic's application to stay the claims of the 1st, 2nd to 6th, and 7th Defendants to the subject matter of these proceedings was dismissed.
18	Nike International Ltd v Campomar SL: Trade Mark Revocation for Non-Use 15 Jan 2006 Nike International Ltd (Appellant)Won	15 Jan 2006	Nike International Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the decision of the Principal Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks to revoke the trade mark was restored.
19	Citibank NA v Lim Soo Peng: Summary Judgment, Economic Duress & Undue Influence 29 Nov 2004 Ee Tai Ting (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	29 Nov 2004	Ee Tai Ting (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed vis-à-vis the prayer for unconditional leave to defend the plaintiff’s claim, affirmed the decision of the assistant registrar on conditional leave to defend, but varied her order on security. The security to be furnished by the second defendant was reduced from $12,643,654.22 to 25% thereof amounting to $3,160,913.56 ($12,643,654.22 x 25%). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Koh Keow Neo v Chee Johnny: Privatisation of HUDC Estate Dispute 05 May 2004 Ling Chwee Seng (Defendant)Won	05 May 2004	Ling Chwee Seng (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Nganthavee Teriya v Ang Yee Lim: Striking Out Third Party Proceedings for Lack of Cause of Action 09 Apr 2003 Tan Leong Ko William (Defendant)Lost	09 Apr 2003	Tan Leong Ko William (Defendant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against striking out the third party claim was dismissed.
22	SM Summit v Microsoft: Discovery of Documents in Defamation Claim for Software Piracy 14 May 2001 Lee Cross (Defendant)Won	14 May 2001	Lee Cross (Defendant): Discovery application allowedDefendants' applications for discovery allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Lee Yong Chuan Edwin v Tan Soan Lian: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Gift of Shares & Maintenance 04 Dec 2000 Lee Yong Chuan Edwin (Appellant)Partial	04 Dec 2000	Lee Yong Chuan Edwin (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding the exclusion of LKTH and LKTI shares from matrimonial assets.
24	Leo Teng Choy v Leo Teng Kit: Construction of Wills & Trustees' Powers 16 Nov 2000 Leo Teng Choy (Appellant)Lost	16 Nov 2000	Leo Teng Choy (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The security for costs (with any accrued interest) shall be paid out to the respondents or their solicitors. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
25	Law Society of Singapore v Disciplinary Committee: Kwa Kim Li & Quahe Mei Lin - Professional Conduct & Touting 13 Aug 2000 Kwa Kim Li (Respondent)Won	13 Aug 2000	Kwa Kim Li (Respondent): No cause of sufficient gravity for disciplinary action existsThe Disciplinary Committee determined that no cause of sufficient gravity for disciplinary action existed under s 83 of the Legal Profession Act in respect of Kwa Kim Li, and the High Court agreed.
26	Ang Teng Siong v Lee Su Min: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Club Membership Dispute 28 Apr 2000 Lee Su Min (Respondent)Partial	28 Apr 2000	Lee Su Min (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partWife's appeal allowed in part regarding the SICC membership refund; the amount the wife had to pay the husband was reduced to $24,850 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
27	Business Software Alliance v SM Summit: Discovery, Implied Undertaking & Defamation 23 Apr 2000 Business Software Alliance (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	23 Apr 2000	Business Software Alliance (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding the right to seek discovery, but the specific discovery requests were deemed too broad. Applications remitted for reconsideration. (Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore).
28	Microsoft v SM Summit: Jurisdiction, Criminal Procedure Code & Implied Undertaking 08 Mar 2000 Lee Cross (Appellant)Lost	08 Mar 2000	Lee Cross (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.