Vinodh Coomaraswamy

Vinodh Coomaraswamy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 38 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and avoidance of transactions. Their track record shows a 39.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 13 complex cases, representing 34% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated expertise across 128 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	21 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 21 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	19 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 19 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	11 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	11 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	11 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transactions at an undervalue	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undervalue Transaction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service of document out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trusts — Constructive trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trusts — Express trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recipient liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Economic Duress	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reverse Takeover	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Whiplash Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loss of Chance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Charterparty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Scheme of Arrangement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rights of way	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Land disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abandonment of Easement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Licensing Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Secured Convertible Note	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Debenture	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voyage Charterparty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Severance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best Endeavours Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Company	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive trustee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Transaction at Undervalue	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Default Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Premises Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Nominee Director	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penalties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Jurisdiction and Arrest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vinodh Coomaraswamy has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 17 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok	17 cases	45% of cases	Obegi Melissa v Vestwin Trading: Breach of Confidence & Conversion of Discarded Documents(Jan 2008) Justlogin v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Damages Assessment for Loss of Chance in iProp Asset Sale(Nov 2006) Vestwin Trading v Obegi Melissa: Breach of Confidence & Conversion of Property(Jun 2006)
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	10 cases	26% of cases	Lim Koon Park v Yap Jin Meng Bryan: Dispute over River Valley Road Properties and Profit Sharing(Aug 2012) Wee Siew Bock v Chan Yuen Yee: Easement Rights, Abandonment, and Interference(Jun 2012) Sim Hok Khun v Henry Budi Harsono: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of Trust over Jardine Matheson Shares(Apr 2012)
Shook Lin and Bok	9 cases	24% of cases	Azero Investments SA v Velstra Pte Ltd: Unfair Preference & Constructive Trust in Insolvency(Sep 2005) Wisanggeni Lauw v Full Fledge Holdings: Breach of Contract & Share Transfer Dispute(Apr 2005) Velstra Pte Ltd v Azero Investments SA: Director's Duties & Unfair Preference(Nov 2004)
ShookLin & Bok LLP	2 cases	5% of cases	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes(Aug 2010) Rockline Ltd v Anil Thadani: Expungement of Evidence and Privilege in Breach of Contract and Conspiracy Suit(Sep 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vinodh Coomaraswamy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.9
Complex Cases: 13 (34%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	22.0 parties avg	2.0	5%
Lost	177.3 parties avg	7.3	45%
Neutral	35.0 parties avg	5.0	8%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Won	154.5 parties avg	4.5	39%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	54.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	72.6 parties avg	2.6
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	28.0 parties avg	8.0
2008	49.4 parties avg	9.4
2009	212.9 parties avg	12.9
2010	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2012	43.8 parties avg	3.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vinodh Coomaraswamy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	2(5%)	5%
Lost	17(45%)	45%
Neutral	3(8%)	8%
Partial	1(3%)	3%
Won	15(39%)	39%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,067,000.00	153,350.0020 cases	20
USD	5,729,846.98	1,909,948.993 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2001	5 122	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Neutral: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2002	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	4 13	Dismissed: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2004	7 1312	Dismissed: 1 cases (14.3%) Lost: 3 cases (42.9%) Partial: 1 cases (14.3%) Won: 2 cases (28.6%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2009	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2012	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 38 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Koon Park v Yap Jin Meng Bryan: Dispute over River Valley Road Properties and Profit Sharing 06 Aug 2012 Yap Jin Meng Bryan (Defendant)Won	06 Aug 2012	Yap Jin Meng Bryan (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant on CounterclaimThe first defendant was awarded judgment on his counterclaim.
2	Wee Siew Bock v Chan Yuen Yee: Easement Rights, Abandonment, and Interference 27 Jun 2012 Chan Yuen Yee Alexia Eve (Respondent)Won	27 Jun 2012	Chan Yuen Yee Alexia Eve (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld with costs to be paid by the Appellants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Sim Hok Khun v Henry Budi Harsono: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of Trust over Jardine Matheson Shares 10 Apr 2012 Sim Hok Khun @ Hadi Gunawan (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Apr 2012	Sim Hok Khun @ Hadi Gunawan (Plaintiff): Application DismissedDefendant's application to stay the action was granted, effectively dismissing the plaintiff's claim in Singapore. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Menjit Singh v Ong Lay Peng: Whiplash Injury, Damages Assessment, Loss of Earnings 16 Jan 2012 Ong Lay Peng (Appellant, Defendant)Won	16 Jan 2012	Ong Lay Peng (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the decision of the Assistant Registrar regarding the damages awarded to the respondent was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes 25 Aug 2010 Schroders plc (Other)Neutral	25 Aug 2010	Schroders plc (Other): NeutralWatching brief.
6	Law Society of Singapore v Jasmine Gowrimani: Disciplinary Tribunal Discretion & Legal Profession Act Interpretation 06 May 2010 Jasmine Gowrimani d/o Daniel (Respondent)Won	06 May 2010	Jasmine Gowrimani d/o Daniel (Respondent): Application DismissedThe Law Society's application was dismissed, and no order was made as to costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	The "Asia Star": Mitigation of Damages in Voyage Charterparty Dispute 18 Mar 2010 Respondent (Malaysian Company) (Respondent)Lost	18 Mar 2010	Respondent (Malaysian Company) (Respondent): Damages AwardedDamages awarded in the amount of $399,500 (assumed USD, as the damages were calculated in USD). The appeal was allowed, but the respondent was still entitled to recover the sum of US$399,500, which is the additional expense that it would have been put to had it chartered the Puma, together with interest on that sum fixed at 3% per annum from the date on which the writ in the present action was filed until payment.
8	Rockline Ltd v Anil Thadani: Expungement of Evidence and Privilege in Breach of Contract and Conspiracy Suit 16 Sep 2009 Symphony Capital Partners Limited (Defendant)Lost	16 Sep 2009	Symphony Capital Partners Limited (Defendant): Application to expunge passages from affidavits dismissedDefendant's application under Summons No 4794 of 2009 is dismissed.
9	Thio Keng Poon v Thio Syn Pyn: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Removal from Company Directorship 03 Jun 2009 Thio Keng Poon (Plaintiff)Lost	03 Jun 2009	Thio Keng Poon (Plaintiff): Claims DismissedPlaintiff's claims in Suit 10 of 2008 and Suit 734 of 2008 were dismissed with costs to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Thio Keng Poon v Malaysia Dairy Industries: Injunction Against Removal of Director 23 Dec 2008 Thio Keng Poon (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Dec 2008	Thio Keng Poon (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication for injunction dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	ING Belgium NV v Projector SA: Winding Up of Foreign Company in Singapore 11 Dec 2008 ING Belgium NV (Applicant)Won	11 Dec 2008	ING Belgium NV (Applicant): Application grantedApplication to wind up Projector SA was granted.
12	Petroval SA v Stainby Overseas Ltd: Mareva Injunctions & Court Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Fraud 01 May 2008 Petroval SA (Plaintiff)Lost	01 May 2008	Petroval SA (Plaintiff): Interlocutory relief set asideThe court set aside the interlocutory relief sought by the plaintiff.
13	Obegi Melissa v Vestwin Trading: Breach of Confidence & Conversion of Discarded Documents 27 Jan 2008 Hill Tree Enterprise Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	27 Jan 2008	Hill Tree Enterprise Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; original judgment of the High Court was set aside.
14	Justlogin v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Damages Assessment for Loss of Chance in iProp Asset Sale 19 Nov 2006 Bank of Singapore Limited (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	19 Nov 2006	Bank of Singapore Limited (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay $1.53 million in damages (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Vestwin Trading v Obegi Melissa: Breach of Confidence & Conversion of Property 26 Jun 2006 Hill Tree Enterprise Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	26 Jun 2006	Hill Tree Enterprise Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffPermanent injunction granted and inquiry as to damages ordered (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Azero Investments SA v Velstra Pte Ltd: Unfair Preference & Constructive Trust in Insolvency 18 Sep 2005 Velstra Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	18 Sep 2005	Velstra Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedVelstra's appeal was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	Wisanggeni Lauw v Full Fledge Holdings: Breach of Contract & Share Transfer Dispute 10 Apr 2005 Full Fledge Holdings Ltd (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	10 Apr 2005	Full Fledge Holdings Ltd (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedFull Fledge's appeal in CA 95/2004 was allowed with costs. The security for costs, together with any accrued interest, shall be refunded to Full Fledge. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
18	Velstra Pte Ltd v Azero Investments SA: Director's Duties & Unfair Preference 08 Nov 2004 Velstra Pte Ltd (in compulsory winding up) (Plaintiff)Partial	08 Nov 2004	Velstra Pte Ltd (in compulsory winding up) (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for US$250,346.98 with interest at 8% from 18 December 2001 and costs.
19	Velstra Pte Ltd v Dexia Bank NV: Avoidance of Transactions at Undervalue under Bankruptcy Act 27 Oct 2004 Velstra Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	27 Oct 2004	Velstra Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The security for costs, together with any accrued interest, shall be released to the respondent to account of the latter’s costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Hyundai Engineering v Rankine and Hill: Negligence Claim over Piping Material Cost Calculation 15 Aug 2004 Hyundai Engineering and Construction Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	15 Aug 2004	Hyundai Engineering and Construction Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's action was effectively dismissed, with costs of $5,000 plus reasonable disbursements awarded to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	Lim Kok Koon v Tan Cheng Yew: Striking Out Writ of Summons & Partnership Liability 16 May 2004 Tan JinHwee Eunice & Lim ChooEng (Defendant)Won	16 May 2004	Tan JinHwee Eunice & Lim ChooEng (Defendant): Appeal AllowedThe second defendant's appeal against the dismissal of their application to strike out the writ of summons was allowed.
22	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp v Justlogin: Breach of Contract & Nominee Director Duties 26 Apr 2004 Bank of Singapore Ltd (Appellant)Lost	26 Apr 2004	Bank of Singapore Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the original judgment against Bank of Singapore Ltd stands.
23	Lim Kok Koon v Tan JinHwee Eunice: Appeal Timing Dispute in Fraud Claim Dismissal 17 Mar 2004 Tan JinHwee Eunice and Lim ChooEng (a firm) (Respondent)Won	17 Mar 2004	Tan JinHwee Eunice and Lim ChooEng (a firm) (Respondent): Motion grantedMotion to set aside the notice of appeal was initially granted, but the court then granted an extension of time to file the Notice of Appeal out of time and thus regularised the notice filed.
24	Velstra Pte Ltd v Dexia Bank: Avoidance of Transactions at Undervalue under Bankruptcy Act 12 Feb 2004 Velstra Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Feb 2004	Velstra Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Claim dismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs.
25	Velstra Pte Ltd v Dexia Bank Belgium: Stay of Proceedings & Prejudice in Concurrent Criminal Case 20 Oct 2003 Velstra Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	20 Oct 2003	Velstra Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedDefendant's appeal was dismissed and costs of $2,000 were awarded to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26	Mercator & Noordstar NV v Velstra Pte Ltd: Winding Up & Transaction at Undervalue 22 Sep 2003 Velstra Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent)Dismissed	22 Sep 2003	Velstra Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent): Claim DismissedThe court declared that the plaintiff has not proven that the payment of US$5,080,000 made by Velstra to Mercator on 5 January 2000 constitutes a transaction at an undervalue within the meaning of s 98 of the Bankruptcy Act read with s 329 of the Companies Act. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	Daewoo Singapore v CEL Tractors: Contractual Interest Dispute Over Late Payment for Heavy Machinery 30 Mar 2003 CEL Tractors Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	30 Mar 2003	CEL Tractors Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiff's action was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	Velstra Pte Ltd v Mercator & Noordstar NV: Avoidance of Transactions at Undervalue under Insolvency Law 23 Feb 2003 Velstra Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	23 Feb 2003	Velstra Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court declared the payment of US$5.08 million by Velstra Pte Ltd to Mercator & Noordstar NV null and void and ordered the recovery of that sum. Assumed USD, as the payment was made in USD.
29	Datawork Pte Ltd v Cyberinc Pte Ltd: Distributorship Agreement Dispute 24 Jun 2002 Datawork Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	24 Jun 2002	Datawork Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedDatawork's appeal was dismissed. The court found that Datawork was estopped from alleging that Cyberinc was in breach of contract. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
30	WSG Nimbus v Board of Control for Cricket: International Arbitration, Anti-Suit Injunction, and Issue Estoppel 12 May 2002 Board of Control for Cricket in Sri Lanka (Defendant)Lost	12 May 2002	Board of Control for Cricket in Sri Lanka (Defendant): Application to set aside anti-suit injunction dismissedThe court dismissed the defendant's application to set aside the anti-suit injunction.
31	Wong Jin Fah v L &M Prestressing: Insurance Coverage Dispute 28 Sep 2001 Wong Jin Fah (Plaintiff)Neutral	28 Sep 2001	Wong Jin Fah (Plaintiff): No outcome information provided in the text.No outcome information provided in the text.
32	Wong Jin Fah v L & M Prestressing: Construction Site Accident, Breach of Statutory Duty, Negligence, Occupier's Liability 30 Aug 2001 Wong Jin Fah (suing by his next friend Ho Chia Hao) (Plaintiff)Won	30 Aug 2001	Wong Jin Fah (suing by his next friend Ho Chia Hao) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffInterlocutory judgment awarded against the first, third, and fourth defendants. Damages to be assessed by the Registrar at a later stage.
33	Sharon Global Solutions v LG International: Economic Duress & Contract Consideration 19 Jun 2001 LG International (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	19 Jun 2001	LG International (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim was dismissed. The amount of US$48,125 was not recovered. The currency is assumed to be SGD based on the jurisdiction of the case.
34	CEL Tractors Pte Ltd: Court Approval of Scheme of Arrangement and Discharge of Guarantor Liabilities 13 Apr 2001 CEL Tractors Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	13 Apr 2001	CEL Tractors Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedThe application to approve the scheme of arrangement was allowed.
35	Re Flint: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel for Mitco - Legal Profession Act 12 Mar 2001 Malaysian International Trading Corporation Sdn Bhd (Other)Neutral	12 Mar 2001	Malaysian International Trading Corporation Sdn Bhd (Other): NeutralMitco was the party seeking representation by Mr. Flint. The outcome of the application was neutral to their underlying suit.
36	Changhe International Investments v Banque International: Jurisdiction & Unless Order Default 03 Aug 2000 Banque International A Luxembourg Bil (Asia) Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	03 Aug 2000	Banque International A Luxembourg Bil (Asia) Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; plaintiffs' claim dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
37	SA Shee v Kaki Bukit: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration Agreement Interpretation 10 Feb 2000 SA Shee & Co (Pte) Ltd (Appellant)Lost	10 Feb 2000	SA Shee & Co (Pte) Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
38	National Aerated Water v Monarch: Trademark License, Restraint of Trade & Beverage Distribution 11 Jan 2000 National Aerated Water Co Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	11 Jan 2000	National Aerated Water Co Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The security for costs shall be paid out to the respondent's solicitors to account of the latter's costs. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.