Farida Begam v PP: Maid Abuse, Voluntarily Causing Hurt, Penal Code

In Farida Begam d/o Mohd Artham v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal by Farida Begam against her conviction and sentence for voluntarily causing hurt to her domestic maid, Khusniati Habib. The Public Prosecutor cross-appealed against the sentence. The High Court dismissed Farida Begam's appeals, allowed the Public Prosecutor's cross-appeal, and enhanced the sentence to nine months' imprisonment, citing aggravating factors and the need for deterrence and public policy.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeals dismissed; cross-appeal allowed.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Farida Begam appeals conviction for maid abuse (voluntarily causing hurt). Appeal dismissed; sentence enhanced due to aggravating factors and public policy.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyCross-appeal allowedWon
Daniel Yong of Deputy Public Prosecutor
Farida Begam d/o Mohd ArthamAppellantIndividualAppeals dismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Yong Pung HowChief JusticeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Daniel YongDeputy Public Prosecutor
Shashi NathanHarry Elias Partnership

4. Facts

  1. The appellant was charged with voluntarily causing hurt to her domestic maid, Khusniati Habib.
  2. The incident occurred on 30 August 1999, at the appellant's residence.
  3. The appellant allegedly hit Khusniati Habib on the head, face, and chest with a wooden scrub and a slipper.
  4. Khusniati Habib made a police report on the same day.
  5. The appellant denied hitting Khusniati Habib and alleged that Khusniati Habib had stolen money and valuables.
  6. The appellant's evidence regarding her whereabouts on 30 August 1999 was inconsistent.
  7. The medical report noted hematomas and lesions over the scalp, bruises over the temples, nose, and eyelids, swelling of the eyes, and a bruise over the shoulder.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Farida Begam d/o Mohd Artham v Public Prosecutor, MA 149/2001, [2001] SGHC 333

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Khusniati Habib started work as a domestic maid in the appellant's household.
Khusniati Habib allegedly fell while washing the kitchen floor.
Incident of abuse occurred at 7:30 am.
Police report lodged at 1:30 pm.
Police took photographs of PW4's injuries at 3 pm.
Appellant made a police report alleging theft by PW4.
Khusniati Habib examined by Dr. Khor Chong Chneah at 9:40 pm.
More photographs of PW4's face were taken at 11 am.
Judgment issued.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Voluntarily Causing Hurt
    • Outcome: The court found that the elements of the offence were present.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Intention to cause hurt
      • Causation of hurt
  2. Sentencing for Maid Abuse
    • Outcome: The court enhanced the sentence, emphasizing deterrence and public policy.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Deterrence
      • Public policy
      • Enhancement of penalties
  3. Assessment of Witness Credibility
    • Outcome: The court assessed the credibility of the witnesses based on their demeanour, internal consistency, and external consistency of their evidence.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Witness demeanour
      • Internal consistency of evidence
      • External consistency of evidence
      • Evidence of disinterested witness
      • Evidence of interested witnesses

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Imprisonment

9. Cause of Actions

  • Voluntarily Causing Hurt

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing
  • Evidence Assessment

11. Industries

  • Domestic Services

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Yap Giau Beng Terence v PPCourt of AppealYes[1998] 3 SLR 656SingaporeCited for the principle that an appellate court should be slow to overturn a trial judge's findings of fact, especially where they hinge on the trial judge's assessment of the credibility and veracity of witnesses.
Thirumalai Kumar v PPHigh CourtYes[1997] 3 SLR 434SingaporeCited for the principle that the evidence of interested parties should be treated with caution.
PP v Tan Fook SumHigh CourtYes[1999] 2 SLR 523SingaporeCited for the principle that the fact that the respondent has no previous convictions is of little assistance to him.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code (Cap 224) s 323Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224) s 73Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224) s 321Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224) s 319Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Maid abuse
  • Voluntarily causing hurt
  • Deterrence
  • Public policy
  • Credibility of witnesses
  • Interested witnesses
  • Disinterested witnesses

15.2 Keywords

  • Maid abuse
  • Voluntarily causing hurt
  • Sentencing
  • Singapore
  • High Court

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing
  • Evidence