Daniel Yong

Daniel Yong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and criminal law. Their track record shows a 86.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Daniel Yong has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	7 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	7 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	6 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Domestic Maid Abuse	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duplicity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misleading Statements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Electronic Monitoring Scheme	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Daniel Yong has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Deputy Public Prosecutor	6 cases	86% of cases	Lim Chuan Huat v Public Prosecutor: Voluntarily Causing Hurt to Maid & Duplicity of Charges(Jan 2002) Phua Mong Seng v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Inducement to Invest & False Statements under Companies Act(Nov 2001) Farida Begam v PP: Maid Abuse & Penal Code Conviction Appeal(Nov 2001)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	1 cases	14% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Jamal anak Nyalau: Culpable Homicide Sentencing(Apr 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Daniel Yong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	62.5 parties avg	2.5	86%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Daniel Yong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	6(86%)	86%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Jamal anak Nyalau: Culpable Homicide Sentencing 18 Apr 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	18 Apr 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe accused were found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment.
2	Lim Chuan Huat v Public Prosecutor: Voluntarily Causing Hurt to Maid & Duplicity of Charges 06 Jan 2002 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Jan 2002	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment upheldThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed.
3	Phua Mong Seng v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Inducement to Invest & False Statements under Companies Act 11 Nov 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	11 Nov 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's position was upheld as the appeal was dismissed and the sentence was enhanced.
4	Farida Begam v PP: Maid Abuse & Penal Code Conviction Appeal 07 Nov 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	07 Nov 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Cross-Appeal AllowedThe respondent's cross-appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was enhanced.
5	Farida Begam v PP: Maid Abuse, Voluntarily Causing Hurt, Penal Code 07 Nov 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	07 Nov 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Cross-appeal allowedRespondent's cross-appeal against sentence was allowed and the sentence was enhanced to nine months’ imprisonment.
6	Public Prosecutor v Andy Sofiaan: Reformative Training & Sentencing 13 Aug 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution, Petitioner)Won	13 Aug 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution, Petitioner): Petition AllowedThe Public Prosecutor's petition for revision was allowed, and the sentence of reformative training was revised to commence on 16 February 2000.
7	PP v Mohamed Noor: Criminal Revision and Sentencing for Unlawful Possession of Identity Card 24 May 2000 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Partial	24 May 2000	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Criminal Revision Allowed in PartCriminal Revision No 5/2000 allowed, altering the sentence.