Farida Begam v PP: Maid Abuse & Penal Code Conviction Appeal
Farida Begam d/o Mohd Artham appealed to the High Court of Singapore against her conviction and sentence by a magistrate for an offence under Section 323 of the Penal Code for voluntarily causing hurt to her domestic maid, Khusniati Habib. The Public Prosecutor cross-appealed against the sentence. Yong Pung How CJ dismissed Farida Begam's appeals, allowed the Public Prosecutor's cross-appeal, and enhanced the sentence to nine months imprisonment.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Appellants appeals against conviction and sentence were dismissed, the respondents cross-appeal against sentence was allowed and the sentence was enhanced to nine months imprisonment.
1.3 Case Type
Criminal
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Farida Begam appeals conviction under s 323 of the Penal Code for maid abuse. The High Court dismissed the appeal and enhanced the sentence.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Prosecutor | Respondent | Government Agency | Cross-Appeal Allowed | Won | Daniel Yong of Deputy Public Prosecutor |
Farida Begam d/o Mohd Artham | Appellant | Individual | Appeal Dismissed | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Yong Pung How | Chief Justice | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Daniel Yong | Deputy Public Prosecutor |
Shashi Nathan | Harry Elias Partnership |
4. Facts
- Khusniati Habib started working as a domestic maid in Farida Begam's household on 13 July 1999.
- On 30 August 1999, Farida Begam allegedly hit Khusniati Habib on the head, face, and chest with a wooden scrub and a slipper.
- Khusniati Habib reported the incident to the police on the same day, and photographs of her injuries were taken.
- Farida Begam denied hitting Khusniati Habib and suggested that her injuries were caused by falls or self-infliction.
- Farida Begam also made a police report on the same day, alleging theft by Khusniati Habib.
- The magistrate accepted Khusniati Habib's version of events and convicted Farida Begam under Section 323 of the Penal Code.
- The Chief Justice dismissed the appeals against conviction and sentence and enhanced the sentence to nine months imprisonment.
5. Formal Citations
- Farida Begam d/o Mohd Artham v Public Prosecutor, MA 149/2001, [2001] SGHC 335
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Khusniati Habib started work in the appellant's household as a domestic maid. | |
Incident occurred where Farida Begam allegedly hit Khusniati Habib. | |
Police report lodged at 1.30 pm. | |
Police took photographs of Khusniati Habib's injuries at 3 pm. | |
Farida Begam made a police report alleging theft by Khusniati Habib. | |
Khusniati Habib was examined by Dr Khor Chong Chneah at 9.40 pm. | |
Decision Date |
7. Legal Issues
- Voluntarily Causing Hurt
- Outcome: The court found that the appellant intended to cause hurt to PW4 and that her actions caused the injuries.
- Category: Substantive
- Credibility of Witnesses
- Outcome: The court found PW4 to be a credible witness and rejected the defense's attempts to impeach her credit. The court also found the defense witnesses to be less credible due to inconsistencies in their testimonies.
- Category: Procedural
- Related Cases:
- [1998] 3 SLR 656
- [1997] 3 SLR 434
- Appropriateness of Sentence
- Outcome: The court found the original sentence to be manifestly inadequate and enhanced it to nine months imprisonment, considering the aggravating factors and the legislative intent behind Section 73 of the Penal Code.
- Category: Procedural
- Related Cases:
- Murnita bte Mujini v PP MA 293/2000
- Wong Suet Peng v PP (MA 170/2000)
- Chung Poh Chee v PP (MA 71/2000)
8. Remedies Sought
- Appeal against Conviction
- Appeal against Sentence
- Cross-Appeal against Sentence
9. Cause of Actions
- Voluntarily Causing Hurt
10. Practice Areas
- Criminal Appeals
11. Industries
- Domestic Services
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yap Giau Beng Terence v PP | Court of Appeal | Yes | [1998] 3 SLR 656 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that an appellate court should be slow to overturn a trial judge's findings of fact, especially where they hinge on the trial judge's assessment of the credibility and veracity of witnesses. |
Thirumalai Kumar v PP | Court of Appeal | Yes | [1997] 3 SLR 434 | Singapore | Cited to support the proposition that the evidence of interested parties should be treated with caution. |
PP v Tan Fook Sum | High Court | Yes | [1999] 2 SLR 523 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the absence of previous convictions is of little assistance as a mitigating factor. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Section 323 of the Penal Code (Chapter 224) | Singapore |
Section 73 of the Penal Code | Singapore |
Section 321 of the Penal Code | Singapore |
Section 319 of the Penal Code | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Domestic Maid
- Voluntarily Causing Hurt
- Penal Code
- Maid Abuse
- Credibility of Witnesses
- Aggravating Factors
- Mitigating Factors
15.2 Keywords
- maid abuse
- domestic helper
- Penal Code
- voluntarily causing hurt
- Singapore
- criminal law
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Domestic Maid Abuse | 95 |
Criminal Law | 90 |
Personal Injury | 60 |
Sentencing | 60 |
Criminal Procedure | 50 |
Evidence | 40 |
16. Subjects
- Criminal Law
- Domestic Violence
- Employment Law