Malayan Banking Berhad v Measurex Engineering: Guarantor's Liability for Debt

Malayan Banking Berhad sued Measurex Engineering Pte Ltd and Measurex Corporation Berhad in the High Court of Singapore, seeking to recover sums due under credit facilities guaranteed by Measurex Corporation Berhad. The Assistant Registrar assessed the principal and simple interest payable. Measurex Corporation Berhad appealed the Assistant Registrar's order, arguing against a 1.5% spread in the revolving credit facility and challenging the plaintiff's right to pursue further claims for cost of funds. The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the assessment and clarifying the scope of the remaining claims.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Second defendant's appeal dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Malayan Banking Berhad sued Measurex Engineering and Measurex Corporation Berhad for debt. The court addressed the guarantor's liability and interest calculation.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Malayan Banking BerhadPlaintiff, RespondentCorporationJudgment for Plaintiff, Judgment for Plaintiff, Judgment for Plaintiff, Judgment for PlaintiffWon, Won, Won, WonHerman Jeremiah, Joshua Wong
Measurex Engineering Pte LtdDefendantCorporation
Measurex Corporation BerhadAppellant, Second DefendantCorporationAppeal DismissedLostJohnny Cheo

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Kan Ting ChiuJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Johnny CheoCheo Yeoh & Associates LLC
Herman JeremiahHelen Yeo & Partners
Joshua WongHelen Yeo & Partners

4. Facts

  1. Malayan Banking Berhad granted credit facilities to Measurex Engineering Pte Ltd.
  2. Measurex Corporation Berhad acted as guarantor for the credit facilities.
  3. Measurex Engineering Pte Ltd defaulted on the credit facilities.
  4. Malayan Banking Berhad sued Measurex Corporation Berhad to recover the outstanding debt.
  5. The Assistant Registrar assessed the principal sums and simple interest owing.
  6. The facility letter did not specifically mention the 1.5% spread.
  7. The borrower agreed to an all-in interest rate, which included the 1.5% spread.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Malayan Banking Berhad v Measurex Engineering Pte Ltd and Another, Suit 412/2000/V, RA 112/2002, [2002] SGHC 192

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Lawsuit filed (Suit 412/2000/V)
Interest calculation began
Assistant Registrar ordered final judgment
Judgment sums reduced
High Court dismissed the appeal

7. Legal Issues

  1. Liability of Guarantor
    • Outcome: The court upheld the guarantor's liability for the debt.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Interest Calculation
    • Outcome: The court determined that the 1.5% spread was a component of the agreed interest rates.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract
  • Guarantee

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Banking Litigation

11. Industries

  • Banking

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Revolving Credit Facility
  • Overdraft Facility
  • Guarantee
  • Interest Rate
  • Cost of Funds
  • Spread
  • Simple Interest
  • All-in Interest

15.2 Keywords

  • banking
  • guarantee
  • credit facilities
  • interest
  • debt
  • singapore
  • high court

16. Subjects

  • Banking
  • Finance
  • Debt Recovery

17. Areas of Law

  • Banking Law
  • Contract Law
  • Civil Procedure