Malayan Banking Berhad

Malayan Banking Berhad is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 13 counsels. Through 5 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 6 complex cases, representing 60.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Malayan Banking Berhad has been represented by 5 law firms and 13 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 case	Siew Guo Wei Ng Ka Luon Eddee Vinna Yip Kai Mun
Gurbani & Co LLC	1 case	Prem Gurbani Govintharasah s/o Ramanathan Wu Lennon Leong Chong Prem Kumar Gurbani
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	1 case	Ng Yeow Khoon Claudia Marianne Frankie Khoo
Shook Lin & Bok	1 case	Ng Yeow Khoon Seah Yi Lein Gavin Ooi
Helen Yeo & Partners	2 cases	Herman Jeremiah Joshua Wong

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Malayan Banking Berhad's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.4
Complex Cases: 6 (60.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.5 parties avg	5.5	20.0%
Neutral	34.0 parties avg	4.0	30.0%
Won	56.2 parties avg	6.2	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2017	118.0 parties avg	18.0
2007	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2001	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Malayan Banking Berhad's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(20.0%)	20.0%
Neutral	3(30.0%)	30.0%
Won	5(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	752,637.60	188,159.404 cases	4
USD	3,806,335.85	1,903,167.932 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2020-sgca-99 13 Oct 2020	13 Oct 2020	Respondent	NeutralAttendance of the second respondent dispensed with.
2	2020-sgca-41 28 Apr 2020	28 Apr 2020	Appellant, Plaintiff	LostAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at S$50,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2019-sghci-4 11 Apr 2019	11 Apr 2019	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of US$871,085.61, being the equivalent of the interbank settlement amount specified in the MT 103 STP.
4	2019-sghc-89 01 Apr 2019	01 Apr 2019	Respondent	NeutralThe second respondent was a secured creditor of DP and sold the property mortgaged to it.
5	2019-sghc-61 17 Mar 2019	17 Mar 2019	Plaintiff	LostThe court dismissed Malayan Banking Berhad's claim.
6	2017-sghc-38 01 Mar 2017	01 Mar 2017	Defendant	WonEntitled to claim proceeds from the sale of pepper stock in proportion to their contribution. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	2007-sghc-161 27 Sep 2007	27 Sep 2007	Plaintiff	WonThe plaintiff was granted a declaration that the mortgage is valid and the plaintiff’s title under the mortgage is indefeasible. The plaintiff is entitled to enter into possession of the property, to receive rents and profits thereof and to exercise their mortgagee’s power of sale over the property; and judgment against the first defendant for $752,637.60 and interest in respect of the loan. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
8	2002-sghc-192 25 Aug 2002	25 Aug 2002	Plaintiff, Respondent	WonFinal judgment for the Plaintiff against the 2nd Defendant in relation to the revolving credit facility for the principal sum assessed at US$2,935,250.24 (assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts).
9	2001-sghc-181 12 Jul 2001	12 Jul 2001	Respondent	NeutralCreditor allowed to be heard in the application for an interim order.
10	2001-sghc-5 03 Jan 2001	03 Jan 2001	Plaintiff, Respondent	WonAppeal by the defendant was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.