Herman Jeremiah

Herman Jeremiah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 21 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and banking law. Their track record shows a 48.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated expertise across 76 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	19 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 19 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	9 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	7 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Separability Doctrine	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship Design	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collateral Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warehouseman Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Financing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minimum Legal Obligation Rule	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forex Transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debtor and Creditor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letters of Credit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Choice of Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum of costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Lien	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Herman Jeremiah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Herman Jeremiah has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Helen Yeo & Partners	8 cases	38% of cases	Malayan Banking Berhad v Measurex Engineering: Guarantor's Liability for Debt(Aug 2002) BNP Paribas v Polynesia Timber: Substituted Service & Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Debt Recovery(Mar 2002) Banque Nationale De Paris v Tan Nancy: Agency, Authority, and Costs in Share Transactions(Dec 2001)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	5 cases	24% of cases	CYW v CYX: Setting Aside Arbitration Award - Costs Assessment in SICC(Oct 2023) CYW v CYX: Setting Aside Arbitration Award - Breach of Natural Justice(May 2023) UniCredit Bank AG v Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd: Letter of Credit Fraud & Misrepresentation(Oct 2022)
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	3 cases	14% of cases	ABN AMRO Bank v CWT Commodities: Collateral Management Agreement & Warehouseman's Duty(Jan 2011) Aldabe Fermin v Standard Chartered Bank: Wrongful Dismissal & Disciplinary Hearing(Apr 2010) Denmark Skibstekniske v Ultrapolis: Enforcement of Danish Arbitration Award in Singapore(Apr 2010)
Rodyk & Davidson	3 cases	14% of cases	Denmark Skibstekniske v Ultrapolis: Winding Up Petition Based on Arbitration Award(Sep 2011) Fermin Aldabe v Standard Chartered Bank: Electronic Discovery & Inspection of E-mails(Aug 2009) Kea Meng Kwang v Merrill Lynch: Examination of Witnesses Outside Jurisdiction(Sep 2006)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson	1 cases	5% of cases	UniCredit Bank v Glencore: Tort of Deceit & Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transaction(Nov 2023)
Rodyk and Davidson	1 cases	5% of cases	Oakwell Engineering v Energy Power Systems: Breach of Contract & Financial Closure(Oct 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Herman Jeremiah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 3 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	73.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Partial	45.2 parties avg	5.2	19%
Won	102.5 parties avg	2.5	48%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2001	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Herman Jeremiah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(33%)	33%
Partial	4(19%)	19%
Won	10(48%)	48%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
EUR	1,079,954.30	539,977.152 cases	2
SGD	934,359.51	84,941.7711 cases	11
USD	18,260,502.47	3,652,100.495 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	4 22	Partial: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2002	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 21 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	UniCredit Bank v Glencore: Tort of Deceit & Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transaction 27 Nov 2023 UniCredit Bank AG (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	27 Nov 2023	UniCredit Bank AG (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; UniCredit to pay costs of $100,000 to Glencore (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	CYW v CYX: Setting Aside Arbitration Award - Costs Assessment in SICC 30 Oct 2023 CYX (Respondent)Won	30 Oct 2023	CYX (Respondent): Costs AwardedCosts awarded to CYX in the amount of S$174,734.41 inclusive of GST and disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	CYW v CYX: Setting Aside Arbitration Award - Breach of Natural Justice 30 May 2023 CYX (Respondent)Won	30 May 2023	CYX (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed, and CYW was ordered to pay CYX's costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	UniCredit Bank AG v Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd: Letter of Credit Fraud & Misrepresentation 20 Oct 2022 UniCredit Bank AG (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Oct 2022	UniCredit Bank AG (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedAll claims against the defendant were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Jeyaretnam v Malayaperumal: Constructive Trusts & Equitable Lien on HDB Flat 29 Aug 2019 Ruhunadevi Daphne Inparani A Joshua (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Aug 2019	Ruhunadevi Daphne Inparani A Joshua (Plaintiff): Equitable lien imposedEquitable lien imposed on the HDB flat for $329,812.55 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	BCY v BCZ: Dispute over Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction & Arbitration Agreement Governing Law 08 Nov 2016 BCZ (Defendant)Lost	08 Nov 2016	BCZ (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff and the defendant are to take all necessary steps to secure to the plaintiff the release of the sum of US$100,000 (being the security for costs provided by the defendant) from the escrow account established by the ICC Secretariat.
7	Denmark Skibstekniske v Ultrapolis: Winding Up Petition Based on Arbitration Award 15 Sep 2011 Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S I Likvidation (formerly known as Knud E Hansen A/S) (Applicant)Won	15 Sep 2011	Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S I Likvidation (formerly known as Knud E Hansen A/S) (Applicant): Winding up order grantedUltrapolis be wound up by the court; DSK’s costs in these proceedings to be agreed or taxed and to be paid to DSK out of the assets of Ultrapolis.
8	ABN AMRO Bank v CWT Commodities: Collateral Management Agreement & Warehouseman's Duty 16 Jan 2011 ABN AMRO Bank NV, Singapore Branch (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Jan 2011	ABN AMRO Bank NV, Singapore Branch (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Aldabe Fermin v Standard Chartered Bank: Wrongful Dismissal & Disciplinary Hearing 21 Apr 2010 Standard Chartered Bank (Defendant)Lost	21 Apr 2010	Standard Chartered Bank (Defendant): Claim Partially DismissedThe defendant was found liable for wrongful dismissal, but the damages were limited. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Denmark Skibstekniske v Ultrapolis: Enforcement of Danish Arbitration Award in Singapore 08 Apr 2010 Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S I Likvidation (formerly known as Knud E Hansen A/S) (Applicant)Won	08 Apr 2010	Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S I Likvidation (formerly known as Knud E Hansen A/S) (Applicant): Leave granted to enforce the Corrected AwardLeave is granted to enforce the Corrected Award in Arbitration case file E-1001 passed on 16 April 2009 in Copenhagen, Denmark at the Danish Institute of Arbitration in the same manner as a Judgment of the High Court of Singapore. Judgment in terms of the Corrected Award is entered as follows: (a) Ultrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd (formerly Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd.) is ordered to pay to Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S i likvidation (formerly Knud E. Hansen A/S) EUR 357,855.00 with interest 1.5% per month of:- i. EUR 7,892 from 25 March 2006 until payment; ii. EUR 100,000 from 14 April 2006 until payment; iii. EUR 863 from 3 May 2006 until payment; iv. EUR 249,100 from 30 June 2006 until payment; within 14 days from the award (i.e. from 16 April 2009). (b) Ultrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd. (formerly Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd.) is ordered to refund EUR 23,406 to Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S i likvidation (formerly Knud E Hanswen A/S) as costs of the arbitration case within 14 days from the date of the award (i.e. from 16 April 2009). (c) Ultrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd. (formerly Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd.) is ordered to refund EUR 12,000 to Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S i likvidation (formerly Knud E Hansen A/S) as costs of Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S i likvidation (formerly Knud E Hansen A/S) within 14 days from the date of the award (i.e. from 16 April 2009).
11	Fermin Aldabe v Standard Chartered Bank: Electronic Discovery & Inspection of E-mails 26 Aug 2009 Standard Chartered Bank (Defendant)Partial	26 Aug 2009	Standard Chartered Bank (Defendant): Application granted with directionsApplication granted with directions for the exchange of electronic copies of documents and subsequent inspection.
12	Kea Meng Kwang v Merrill Lynch: Examination of Witnesses Outside Jurisdiction 11 Sep 2006 PT Siak Raya Timber (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Sep 2006	PT Siak Raya Timber (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
13	Oakwell Engineering v Energy Power Systems: Breach of Contract & Financial Closure 15 Oct 2003 Oakwell Engineering Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	15 Oct 2003	Oakwell Engineering Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; the defendant must pay US$2,700,000 less US$790,000 and US$350,000, and damages of US$2,560,210 for the 6.25% Annual Sum (assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts and international transactions).
14	Malayan Banking Berhad v Measurex Engineering: Guarantor's Liability for Debt 25 Aug 2002 Malayan Banking Berhad (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	25 Aug 2002	Malayan Banking Berhad (Plaintiff, Respondent): Judgment for PlaintiffFinal judgment for the Plaintiff against the 2nd Defendant in relation to the revolving credit facility for the principal sum assessed at US$2,935,250.24 (assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts).
15	BNP Paribas v Polynesia Timber: Substituted Service & Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Debt Recovery 25 Mar 2002 BNP Paribas (formerly known as Banque National De Paris) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	25 Mar 2002	BNP Paribas (formerly known as Banque National De Paris) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe plaintiffs' appeal was allowed, reversing the orders made below (save for costs).
16	Banque Nationale De Paris v Tan Nancy: Agency, Authority, and Costs in Share Transactions 04 Dec 2001 Banque Nationale de Paris (Appellant)Partial	04 Dec 2001	Banque Nationale de Paris (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; BNP awarded 25% of costs below and 40% of costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Banque Nationale v Tan Nancy: Unauthorized Trading & Authority in Forex Transactions 20 Nov 2001 Banque Nationale de Paris (Appellant)Won	20 Nov 2001	Banque Nationale de Paris (Appellant): Claims AllowedThe claims of Banque Nationale De Paris against Tan Shee Chin and Nancy Tan were allowed with interest at 6% from the date of the writ.
18	Malayan Banking Bhd v Measurex Engineering: Summary Judgment Appeal on Loan Contract Guarantee 24 Jul 2001 Malayan Banking Bhd (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Jul 2001	Malayan Banking Bhd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of US$3,100,937.72.
19	Malayan Banking Berhad v Measurex Engineering: Jurisdiction Dispute under Guarantee Agreement 03 Jan 2001 Malayan Banking Berhad (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	03 Jan 2001	Malayan Banking Berhad (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal by the defendant was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Banque Nationale de Paris v Hew Keong Chan Gary: Accessory Liability & Unauthorized Transactions 19 Nov 2000 Banque Nationale de Paris (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Nov 2000	Banque Nationale de Paris (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against all defendants was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
21	OCBC v Daewoo Singapore: Frustration of Contract & Guarantee Obligations Due to Financial Crisis 04 Jun 2000 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	04 Jun 2000	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff for US$7,014,104.51 (assumed USD, as the loan was denominated in US dollars).