Excel Golf v Allied Domecq: Breach of Contract & Public Apology Remedy

Excel Golf Pte Ltd sued Allied Domecq Spirits & Wine (Singapore) Ltd in the High Court of Singapore on 21 October 2003, for breach of contract, seeking damages and an order for Allied Domecq to publish a public apology. The High Court dismissed Excel Golf's appeal, holding that the court does not have the power to order a party in breach of contract to make a public apology.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal dismissed with costs.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Excel Golf sued Allied Domecq for breach of contract, seeking damages and a public apology. The court dismissed the appeal, holding it lacked the power to order a public apology.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Excel Golf Pte LtdAppellant, PlaintiffCorporationAppeal dismissed with costsLostS H Almenoar, Raji Ramason
Allied Domecq Spirits & Wine (Singapore) LtdRespondent, DefendantCorporationAppeal AllowedWonAng Cheng Hock

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
S RajendranJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
S H AlmenoarTan Rajah & Cheah
Raji RamasonTan Rajah & Cheah
Ang Cheng HockAllen & Gledhill

4. Facts

  1. Excel Golf and Domecq Singapore entered into an agreement for Excel to organise golf tournaments called “Ballantines Legends of Golf”.
  2. Domecq Singapore allegedly reneged on the agreement after Excel had publicly committed to organising the tournament.
  3. Excel claimed Domecq Singapore's actions caused financial loss and harm to Excel's credibility and reputation.
  4. Excel sought damages and an order for Domecq Singapore to publish an apology in various publications.
  5. The Assistant Registrar struck out the request for an apology, leading to Excel's appeal.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Excel Golf Pte Ltd v Allied Domecq Spirits & Wine (Singapore) Ltd, Suit 286/2003, RA 178/2003, [2003] SGHC 255

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court accepted, for the purposes of the appeal, that there had been a breach of contract by Domecq Singapore.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Availability of Remedy
    • Outcome: The court held that it does not have the power to order a party in breach of contract to make a public apology.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Damages
  2. Order for public apology

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Wine and Spirits
  • Sports
  • Event Management

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Gatley on Libel and SlanderN/AYesGatley on Libel and Slander (9th Ed), para 9.1N/ACited for the principle that courts do not have the power to order a defendant to publish a correction or apology in defamation actions.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322, 1999 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Breach of contract
  • Public apology
  • Remedy
  • European Seniors PGA Tour
  • Ballantines Legends of Golf

15.2 Keywords

  • contract
  • apology
  • remedy
  • golf
  • singapore

16. Subjects

  • Contract Law
  • Civil Procedure

17. Areas of Law

  • Contract Law
  • Remedies