S H Almenoar

S H Almenoar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and club law. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

S H Almenoar has demonstrated expertise across 53 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	10 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Club Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Promise	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loans	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Privity of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Authority	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Demeanor of Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Exchange of Cheques	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S H Almenoar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

S H Almenoar has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
R. Ramason & Almenoar	8 cases	62% of cases	Law Society v Wan Hui Hong: Solicitor Dishonesty & Client Gifts(Apr 2013) Chainford Investment Ltd v Ng Kim Hock: Loan Dispute & Family Conflict(Jul 2011) Yo Kian Peng v Ng Kim Hock: Loan Dispute Involving Multiple Companies(Dec 2010)
Tan Rajah & Cheah	3 cases	23% of cases	Excel Golf v Allied Domecq: Breach of Contract & Public Apology Remedy(Oct 2003) Trigen Industries v Sinko Technologies: Breach of Contract & Agency in Computer Chip Sale(Oct 2002) Ali bin Serti v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Mar 2001)
Kim & Co	1 cases	8% of cases	AQB v AQC: Appeal on Conditions for Final Divorce Judgment under Women's Charter(Apr 2011)
Tan Rajah and Cheah	1 cases	8% of cases	Excel Golf v Allied Domecq: Contract Breach, Oral Agreement & Partnership(Aug 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of S H Almenoar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	82.5 parties avg	2.5	62%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	15%
Won	42.4 parties avg	2.4	31%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of S H Almenoar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(57%)	57%
Partial	2(14%)	14%
Won	4(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	921,607.10	102,400.799 cases	9
USD	149,760.00	149,760.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	5 311	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Law Society v Wan Hui Hong: Solicitor Dishonesty & Client Gifts 21 Apr 2013 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	21 Apr 2013	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantThe Law Society's application was successful; the respondent was found dishonest and ordered to be struck off the roll. Costs were awarded to the Law Society on a standard basis, to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Chainford Investment Ltd v Ng Kim Hock: Loan Dispute & Family Conflict 05 Jul 2011 Glenwood (Defendant)Won	05 Jul 2011	Glenwood (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against Glenwood is dismissed.
3	AQB v AQC: Appeal on Conditions for Final Divorce Judgment under Women's Charter 26 Apr 2011 AQB (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	26 Apr 2011	AQB (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedWife's appeal against the decision to grant the husband leave to make the interim judgment final was dismissed.
4	Yo Kian Peng v Ng Kim Hock: Loan Dispute Involving Multiple Companies 21 Dec 2010 Ng Kim Hock (Defendant)Won	21 Dec 2010	Ng Kim Hock (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant with costs awarded to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Ho Soo Fong v Ng Chuan Hwa: Loan Recovery & Guarantee Dispute in Construction Projects 13 Jun 2010 Ng Soon Wah (Respondent)Partial	13 Jun 2010	Ng Soon Wah (Respondent): Liable for DebtThe second respondent is liable for the debt of the Company up to a sum of $47,100 ($75,507.10 - $23,000 - $5,407.10) together with interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of the writ to the date of this judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Kay Swee Pin v Singapore Island Country Club: Defamation, Justification, and Qualified Privilege 09 Jun 2010 Kay Swee Pin (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Jun 2010	Kay Swee Pin (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedKSP’s libel action fails and is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Chee Jok Heng Stephanie v Chang Yue Shoon: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Recovery of Funds 19 May 2010 Chang Yue Shoon (Defendant)Lost	19 May 2010	Chang Yue Shoon (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the Defendant; restitution of $45,000 and $682,000 ordered (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Kay Swee Pin v Singapore Island Country Club: Damages for Wrongful Suspension of Club Membership 28 Aug 2008 Kay Swee Pin (Plaintiff)Partial	28 Aug 2008	Kay Swee Pin (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentDamages of $72,000 awarded for deprivation of membership rights and mental distress; claim for aggravated, exemplary, and punitive damages disallowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Kay Swee Pin v SICC: Disciplinary Action Review & Natural Justice 11 Mar 2008 Kay Swee Pin (Appellant)Won	11 Mar 2008	Kay Swee Pin (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs to the appellant. Suspension order declared invalid. Respondent to refund all sums paid by the appellant and awarded damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
10	Excel Golf v Allied Domecq: Contract Breach, Oral Agreement & Partnership 02 Aug 2004 Excel Golf Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Aug 2004	Excel Golf Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim dismissed with costs to the defendant.
11	Excel Golf v Allied Domecq: Breach of Contract & Public Apology Remedy 20 Oct 2003 Excel Golf Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	20 Oct 2003	Excel Golf Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed with costsAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
12	Trigen Industries v Sinko Technologies: Breach of Contract & Agency in Computer Chip Sale 28 Oct 2002 Sinko Technologies Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	28 Oct 2002	Sinko Technologies Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against the DefendantJudgment against the defendant in the sum of US$134,400 and a further sum of US$15,360, with interest and costs. Assumed USD as the transactions were in USD.
13	Ali bin Serti v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 11 Mar 2001 Ali bin Serti (Appellant)Lost	11 Mar 2001	Ali bin Serti (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.