PP v Choa Joo Liang: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act

In Public Prosecutor v Choa Joo Liang, the High Court of Singapore found Choa Joo Liang guilty of trafficking in diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act. The court addressed issues regarding the handling of drug evidence and discrepancies in photographs of the seized drugs. Despite these issues, the court found sufficient evidence to convict Choa Joo Liang and sentenced him to death.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Accused found guilty and sentenced to death.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Choa Joo Liang was convicted of trafficking diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act. The High Court addressed issues with drug evidence handling and photographic discrepancies.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyJudgment for ProsecutionWonRavneet Kaur, Wayne Koh
Choa Joo LiangDefendantIndividualConvictedLostKelvin Lim, Loo Khee Sheng

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Kan Ting ChiuJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Ravneet KaurDeputy Public Prosecutors
Wayne KohDeputy Public Prosecutors
Kelvin LimKelvin Lim and Partners
Loo Khee ShengK S Loo and Co

4. Facts

  1. CNB officers raided the apartment of the accused and his girlfriend.
  2. The accused was found squatting in the toilet with packets of granular substance.
  3. The granular substance was later found to contain 103.15 grams of diamorphine.
  4. The accused admitted the drugs were his and intended for sale and personal consumption.
  5. Drug trafficking paraphernalia was found in the master bedroom.
  6. The accused disclosed he obtained the heroin from a Malaysian Chinese known as 'Ah Hoe'.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Choa Joo Liang, CC 21/2004, [2004] SGHC 271

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Accused trafficked controlled drug at Block 537 Bukit Panjang Ring Road.
Judgment delivered.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Trafficking in Controlled Drugs
    • Outcome: The accused was found guilty of trafficking in diamorphine.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Admissibility of Drug Evidence
    • Outcome: The court addressed concerns about the handling of drug evidence but found the evidence admissible.
    • Category: Procedural
  3. Admissibility of Photographic Evidence
    • Outcome: The court addressed concerns about the color discrepancy in the photographs of the drugs but found the evidence admissible.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Conviction
  2. Capital Punishment

9. Cause of Actions

  • Trafficking in Controlled Drugs

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2001 Rev Ed)Singapore
Sections 5(1)(a) and 5(2) Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2001 Rev Ed)Singapore
Section 33 of the Misuse of Drugs ActSingapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Diamorphine
  • Trafficking
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • CNB
  • Health Sciences Authority
  • Granular Substance
  • Drug Paraphernalia

15.2 Keywords

  • Drug Trafficking
  • Diamorphine
  • Singapore
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • Criminal Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Trafficking
  • Evidence

17. Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Statutory Offences
  • Drug Trafficking
  • Evidence