Loo Khee Sheng

Loo Khee Sheng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 10.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	8 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	6 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trafficking of Drugs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loo Khee Sheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Loo Khee Sheng has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
K S Loo & Co	4 cases	40% of cases	Chan Lie Sian v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction Appeal - Sudden Fight Defence(Jul 2019) Zainal bin Hamad v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2018) Micheal Anak Garing v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction and Sentencing Appeal(Feb 2017)
KS Loo & Co	4 cases	40% of cases	Mohd Aziz v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Drug Trafficking(Nov 2018) PP v Tan Kay Yong: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Mar 2018) Bing Integrated Construction v Eco Special Waste Management: Construction Payment Dispute(Jun 2010)
K S Loo and Co	2 cases	20% of cases	Choa Joo Liang v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Mandatory Death Sentence for Drug Trafficking(Mar 2005) PP v Choa Joo Liang: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Dec 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Loo Khee Sheng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 2 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.7 parties avg	2.7	60%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	10%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	20%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	10%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Loo Khee Sheng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(60%)	60%
Neutral	1(10%)	10%
Partial	2(20%)	20%
Won	1(10%)	10%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chan Lie Sian v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction Appeal - Sudden Fight Defence 29 Jul 2019 Chan Lie Sian (Appellant)Partial	29 Jul 2019	Chan Lie Sian (Appellant): Conviction under s 300(a) of the PC set aside; conviction under s 300(c) of the PC substituted; death penalty set aside; sentence of life imprisonment imposedThe Court of Appeal substituted the appellant’s conviction under s 300(a) of the PC with a conviction under s 300(c) of the PC and sentenced him to life imprisonment.
2	Mohd Aziz v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Drug Trafficking 14 Nov 2018 MOHD AZIZ BIN HUSSAIN (Appellant)Lost	14 Nov 2018	MOHD AZIZ BIN HUSSAIN (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
3	Zainal bin Hamad v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Oct 2018 ZAINAL BIN HAMAD (Appellant)Lost	02 Oct 2018	ZAINAL BIN HAMAD (Appellant): Appeal dismissedZainal's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
4	PP v Tan Kay Yong: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Mar 2018 Tan Kay Yong (Defendant)Lost	20 Mar 2018	Tan Kay Yong (Defendant): ConvictedTan Kay Yong was convicted of possession of a Class A controlled drug (diamorphine) for the purpose of trafficking and sentenced to death.
5	Micheal Anak Garing v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction and Sentencing Appeal 26 Feb 2017 TONY ANAK IMBA (Respondent)Neutral	26 Feb 2017	TONY ANAK IMBA (Respondent): Sentence UpheldSentence of life imprisonment and caning upheld.
6	Chan Heng Kong v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, and Mens Rea 05 Mar 2012 Sng Chun Heng (Appellant)Partial	05 Mar 2012	Sng Chun Heng (Appellant): Conviction AmendedSng Chun Heng's conviction was amended from abetment by instigation to abetment by aiding. Appeal dismissed.
7	Bing Integrated Construction v Eco Special Waste Management: Construction Payment Dispute 29 Jun 2010 Another (Other)Won	29 Jun 2010	Another (Other): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the 2nd third party, Chua Tiong Guan. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Choa Joo Liang v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Mandatory Death Sentence for Drug Trafficking 15 Mar 2005 Choa Joo Liang (Appellant)Lost	15 Mar 2005	Choa Joo Liang (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the death sentence was dismissed.
9	PP v Choa Joo Liang: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Dec 2004 Choa Joo Liang (Defendant)Lost	02 Dec 2004	Choa Joo Liang (Defendant): ConvictedAccused found guilty of trafficking diamorphine and sentenced to death.
10	Tan Ah Suan v Ng Aik Kern: Adverse Possession Claim on Jalan Daud Property 02 Oct 2002 Tan Ah Suan (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Oct 2002	Tan Ah Suan (Plaintiff): Claim dismissedMadam Tan's claim for ownership of the Jalan Daud property by adverse possession was dismissed.