Tong Guan Food Products v Ong Leong Chuan: Appeal on Costs Order Refusal

In Suit 1633/1999, Tong Guan Food Products Pte Ltd sued Ong Leong Chuan for breach of director duties. Ong Heng Chuan and another intervened. After a consent judgment was entered, the plaintiff sought to implement its terms against all three brothers. The second intervener's application for leave to appeal against a costs order was dismissed by the High Court on 23 April 2004, with Choo Han Teck J finding no merit to warrant an appeal to the Court of Appeal.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Second intervener's appeal dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal against refusal to grant leave to appeal costs order. The court dismissed the appeal, finding no merit to warrant an appeal.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Ong Heng ChuanIntervenerIndividualLostLost
Tong Guan Food Products Pte LtdPlaintiffCorporationNeutralNeutral
AnotherIntervener, AppellantOtherLostLost
Ong Leong ChuanDefendantIndividualWonWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiff company sued the defendant, a director, for alleged breaches of duties.
  2. The plaintiff sought an accounting of assets purchased through company funds and alleged misappropriation of $200,000.
  3. The first and second interveners are the defendant’s brothers and were also directors of the plaintiff company.
  4. The plaintiff and defendant entered a consent judgment.
  5. Ernst & Young were appointed as the special accountant and they rendered a report in July 2002.
  6. The report indicated that the two interveners were to be liable in respect of irregularities stated in the said schedule.
  7. The second intervener applied for leave to appeal against the orders in respect of costs.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Tong Guan Food Products Pte Ltd v Ong Leong Chuan, Suit 1633/1999, NM 600006/2004, [2004] SGHC 80

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Suit No 1633 of 1999 commenced
Trial commenced
Trial adjourned part heard
Consent judgment entered
Ernst & Young rendered report
Plaintiff applied to implement terms of settlement
Interveners applied for leave to intervene
Order on costs made
Second intervener applied for leave to appeal against orders in respect of costs
Appeal dismissed

7. Legal Issues

  1. Leave to Appeal Against Orders on Costs
    • Outcome: The court refused leave to appeal against the orders on costs.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. No remedies sought

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Litigation

11. Industries

  • Food Production

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Consent Judgment
  • Intervener
  • Leave to Appeal
  • Costs Order
  • Special Accountant

15.2 Keywords

  • Appeal
  • Costs
  • Intervener
  • Consent Judgment

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Civil Procedure
  • Appeals
  • Costs