Another

Another is a other in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 44 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 65 counsels. Through 35 law firms. Their track record shows a 34.1% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 7 complex cases, representing 15.9% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Another has been represented by 35 law firms and 65 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Gary Leonard Low Emmanuel Duncan Chua Hing Shan Shan Blossom Allen Lye Xin Ren Adam Muneer Yusoff Maniam Sushil Sukumaran Nair Raymond Lam Kuo Wei
Sankar Ow & Partners LLP	1 case	Kelvin Lee Ming Hui Tan Heng Khim
Helen Yeo & Partners	1 case	Tan Tian Luh Paul Wong Philip Jeyaretnam
NLC Law Asia LLC	1 case	Ng Lip Chih Tang Hang Wu
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	1 case	Toh Wei Yi Andy Lem Harry Elias Farrah Isaac
Drew & Napier	1 case	Celeste Ang Harpreet Singh Nehal Tony Yeo Gerald Koh
Kenneth Tan Partnership	1 case	Kenneth Tan SC
Straits Law Practice LLC	1 case	Valerie Ang N Sreenivasan
Rajah & Tann	1 case	N Sreenivasan Dominic Zou Jeffrey Chan Shankar Kumar
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 case	Kristy Tan Ruyan
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Kelvin Poon Kin Mun Kendall Tan Elaine Tay Ling Yan Daphne Chua Wong Ying Shuang James Teo Jinyong
Braddell Brothers LLP	1 case	Edmund Jerome Kronenburg Zhuang Baoling Alicia
Stamford Law Corporation	1 case	Ang Minghao Lynette Chew Mei Lin
Wong Tan & Molly Lim LLC	1 case	Yap Jie Han Molly Lim Kam Kai Qi
Just Law LLC	1 case	Ramesh Appoo
ATMD Bird & Bird LLP	1 case	Alban Kang Deryne Sim Lifen
KS Loo & Co	1 case	Loo Khee Sheng
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 case	Shahira Anuar Charles Phua Cheng Sye
Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore	1 case	Julia Mohamed
Frontier Law Corporation	1 case	Krishna Morthy S V
Bogaars & Din	1 case	Cecilia Lee Thomas
Allen & Gledhill	1 case	Muthu Arusu
Ascentsia Law Corporation	1 case	Melvin Tan Kai-Lit
Khattar Wong & Partners	1 case	Dinesh Singh Dhillon
Lim & Lim	1 case	Chopra Sarbjit Singh
Toh Tan LLP	1 case	Sujatha Bhargavan
Sim Mong Teck & Partners	1 case	Tan Tuan Wee
Wong & Leow	1 case	Koh Kok Wah
Gn & Company	1 case	Gn Chiang Soon
Phua Wai Partnership	1 case	Leslie Phua Oei Heong
Rajah Retnam & Co	1 case	Rajah Retnam
Peter Moe & Partners	1 case	Ng Siew Hoong
William Lai & Alan Wong	1 case	Chee Yong En
Lee & Lee	1 case	Tang Kin Wai
Chui Sim Goh & Lim	1 case	Jeffrey Sim

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Another's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 7 (15.9%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	213.3 parties avg	3.3	47.7%
Neutral	43.0 parties avg	3.0	9.1%
Partial	33.0 parties avg	3.0	6.8%
Won	153.2 parties avg	3.2	34.1%
	13.0 parties avg	3.0	2.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	53.2 parties avg	3.2
2014	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	43.3 parties avg	3.3
2012	53.2 parties avg	3.2
2011	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	73.4 parties avg	3.4
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2000	113.3 parties avg	3.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Another's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	21(47.7%)	47.7%
Neutral	4(9.1%)	9.1%
Partial	3(6.8%)	6.8%
Won	15(34.1%)	34.1%
	1(2.3%)	2.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,538,428.28	105,767.8524 cases	24

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 23	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%) Won: 3 cases (150.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	2 31	Lost: 3 cases (150.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	2 32	Lost: 3 cases (150.0%) Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 21	Won: 2 cases (100.0%) : 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	2 52	Lost: 5 cases (250.0%) Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	3 121	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2000	3 425	Lost: 4 cases (133.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 5 cases (166.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 44 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2015-sghc-152 09 Jun 2015	09 Jun 2015	Defendant	WonThe court allowed the defendants to recover costs of the action from the trust fund. The quantum of costs is to be determined at a later date, if parties are unable to agree.
2	2015-sghc-144 28 May 2015	28 May 2015	Defendant	LostDefendants’ application dismissed with costs fixed at $5,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2015-sghc-127 07 May 2015	07 May 2015	Defendant, Respondent	WonThe Assistant Registrar's award of a nominal sum of $1,000 for loss of future earnings and dismissal of the claim for loss of earning capacity were upheld. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2015-sghc-23 28 Jan 2015	28 Jan 2015	Defendant	LostThe Defendants appealed against the court's ruling on the preliminary issue.
5	2015-sghc-11 18 Jan 2015	18 Jan 2015	Third Party	WonThe defendants’ claim against the third parties is dismissed. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
6	2014-sghcr-17 14 Aug 2014	14 Aug 2014	Defendant	WonSUM 1620, the Plaintiff's application for stay for lis alibi pendens, was dismissed. SUM 2325, the Defendants’ application for the Court to order the Plaintiff to elect which jurisdiction it wished to proceed under the doctrine of forum election and for the proceedings in the other jurisdiction to be discontinued, was allowed with amendments.
7	2014-sgca-28 25 May 2014	25 May 2014	Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed; required to pay costs.
8	2013-sghcr-25 03 Nov 2013	03 Nov 2013	Plaintiff	LostThe Plaintiffs’ claim is hereby struck out.
9	2013-sghc-120 27 Jun 2013	27 Jun 2013	Defendant	LostDamages are to be paid by the Defendants to the Plaintiff, the quantum of which is the difference between the market value of the Property as at the intended date of completion (on or around 10 May 2010) and the original purchase price of $920,000. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	2013-sghc-103 09 May 2013	09 May 2013	Defendant	NeutralThe co-defendant is mentioned in the judgment but no specific outcome is assigned to her. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	2013-sghc-90 25 Apr 2013	25 Apr 2013	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiffs' claim for specific performance or damages in lieu of specific performance was dismissed.
12	2012-sghc-198 01 Oct 2012	01 Oct 2012	Defendant	WonJudgment in favor of the defendant on some issues.
13	2012-sghcr-11 07 Aug 2012	07 Aug 2012	Defendant	LostDamages assessed against the Defendant in the ratio of 70:30, resulting in a liability of $396,928.28 (70% of $567,040.40, assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	2012-sghc-73 04 Apr 2012	04 Apr 2012	Defendant	WonThe court found that the defendant's actions were justified and dismissed the plaintiff's claim.
15	2012-sghc-69 29 Mar 2012	29 Mar 2012	Defendant	LostThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant was successful, resulting in the invalidation of the defendant's trademarks and the defendant being ordered to pay costs to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	2012-sghc-66 26 Mar 2012	26 Mar 2012	Interveners	LostThe appeal was dismissed.
17	2011-sghc-31 10 Feb 2011	10 Feb 2011	Defendant, Respondent	WonJudgment for the Respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	2011-sghc-22 24 Jan 2011	24 Jan 2011	Defendant	WonThe claim against the defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	2011-sghc-11 12 Jan 2011	12 Jan 2011	Defendant, Respondent	Unknown
20	2010-sghc-362 14 Dec 2010	14 Dec 2010	Defendant, Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed; damages assessed at $1,482,500 based on volume weighted average price of shares on 12 January 2007. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	2010-sghc-287 27 Sep 2010	27 Sep 2010	Defendant, Appellant	LostAppeal against the dismissal of their application for a stay of proceedings was dismissed.
22	2010-sghc-254 25 Aug 2010	25 Aug 2010	Defendant	LostDefendants to bear the costs of the Plaintiff for the trial on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	2010-sghc-232 11 Aug 2010	11 Aug 2010	Defendant	LostOrder for specific performance of the Option. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	2010-sghc-183 29 Jun 2010	29 Jun 2010	Other	WonClaim dismissed against the 2nd third party, Chua Tiong Guan. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
25	2010-sghc-173 06 Jun 2010	06 Jun 2010	Plaintiff	LostApplication to stay or strike out the winding up petitions filed by the defendant is dismissed; costs to the defendant to be agreed or taxed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
26	2010-sghc-68 02 Mar 2010	02 Mar 2010	Respondent	WonThe appeal against the respondent was dismissed.
27	2007-sghc-74 16 May 2007	16 May 2007	Respondent	Neutral
28	2004-sghc-80 22 Apr 2004	22 Apr 2004	Intervener, Appellant	LostSecond intervener's appeal dismissed. No costs were awarded to the interveners (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
29	2002-sghc-151 16 Jul 2002	16 Jul 2002	Defendant	NeutralThe second defendant is an insurance company who is named nominally as a defendant because it had issued a performance bond in favour of the first defendant.
30	2002-sghc-76 17 Apr 2002	17 Apr 2002	Respondent	NeutralThe respondent's sentence of nine months' imprisonment was affirmed.
31	2002-sgca-11 26 Feb 2002	26 Feb 2002	Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed; lost claim to the disputed land. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
32	2002-sghc-25 17 Feb 2002	17 Feb 2002	Defendant	PartialThe court declared that one-quarter of the property is held in trust by the second defendant for the first defendant and constitutes a matrimonial asset. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
33	2001-sghc-6 07 Jan 2001	07 Jan 2001	Appellant	LostThe appeal against the setting aside of the joint statutory demand was dismissed.
34	2000-sghc-265 04 Dec 2000	04 Dec 2000	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiffs' claim against the first and second defendants was dismissed.
35	2000-sghc-255 28 Nov 2000	28 Nov 2000	Defendant, Appellant	LostThe defendant's appeal against the assistant registrar's decision was dismissed.
36	2000-sgca-60 01 Nov 2000	01 Nov 2000	Respondent	WonThe appeal was dismissed with costs and with the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
37	2000-sgca-45 23 Aug 2000	23 Aug 2000	Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
38	2000-sghc-124 30 Jun 2000	30 Jun 2000	Plaintiff	WonAppeal allowed, setting aside the stay order against the first defendants.
39	2000-sghc-118 27 Jun 2000	27 Jun 2000	Defendant, Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
40	2000-sghc-97 26 May 2000	26 May 2000	Defendant, Respondent	PartialAwards for fracture of the left tibia and fibula, fracture of the medial malleolus of left ankle, post-traumatic stress disorder, and post-trial loss of income were reduced; award for pre-trial loss of earnings was upheld. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
41	2000-sghc-69 27 Apr 2000	27 Apr 2000	Defendant, Respondent	WonJudgment for the defendant; costs of $4,000 awarded against the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
42	2000-sgca-11 01 Mar 2000	01 Mar 2000	Appellant	PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, with adjustments made to the terms regarding the repurchase of unsold stock and advertising expenses.
43	2000-sghc-28 27 Feb 2000	27 Feb 2000	Defendant	WonThe claim against the second defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
44	2000-sghc-2 05 Jan 2000	05 Jan 2000	Defendant	WonClaim against the defendant dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.