Kenneth Tan SC

Kenneth Tan SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 24 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and winding up. Their track record shows a 36.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 10 complex cases, representing 42% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated expertise across 99 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	15 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	13 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 13 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	12 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	7 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation Funding	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marketing Agent	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Management Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Title to Sue	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgagee's power of sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Discharge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Champerty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debtor and Creditor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Auditing Standards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting Standards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reasonable Skill and Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Grossly Improper Conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pledge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bailment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Consent Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letters of Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marine Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Standard form contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misdelivery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Meetings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Effective Cause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Solicitors' Accounts Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Failure to supervise	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale and Leaseback	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accountants Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Tan SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kenneth Tan SC has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 21 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kenneth Tan Partnership	21 cases	88% of cases	Hyflux Ltd v KPMG LLP: Striking Out Pleadings for Failure to Disclose Reasonable Cause of Action(Jul 2024) TA Private Capital v UD Trading: Guarantee, Performance Bond & Striking Out Defences(Jan 2024) Lum Ooi Lin v Hyflux Ltd: Appeal on Security for Costs & Court's Discretion(Nov 2023)
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	1 cases	4% of cases	Sinfeng Marine v Taylor: Winding Up, Creditors' Liquidators & Examination Orders(Oct 2020)
Haq & Selvam	1 cases	4% of cases	Otech Pakistan v Clough Engineering: Breach of Oral Contract & Inducement Claim(Mar 2006)
Ang Tan & Chang	1 cases	4% of cases	Goh Chin Soon v Vickers Capital: Mortgagee's Duty of Care & Bankruptcy(Dec 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kenneth Tan SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 10 (42%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	16.0 parties avg	6.0	4%
Lost	143.2 parties avg	3.2	58%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	4%
Won	95.2 parties avg	5.2	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2003	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	45.7 parties avg	5.7
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2024	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kenneth Tan SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(4%)	4%
Lost	14(56%)	56%
Neutral	1(4%)	4%
Won	9(36%)	36%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	295,082.12	19,672.1415 cases	15
USD	63,300,000.00	63,300,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2004	5 131	Dismissed: 1 cases (20.0%) Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 24 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hyflux Ltd v KPMG LLP: Striking Out Pleadings for Failure to Disclose Reasonable Cause of Action 09 Jul 2024 Tuaspring Pte Ltd (under receivership) (Plaintiff)Neutral	09 Jul 2024	Tuaspring Pte Ltd (under receivership) (Plaintiff): Application to strike out parts of Statement of Claim dismissedThe defendant's application to strike out parts of the Statement of Claim was dismissed.
2	TA Private Capital v UD Trading: Guarantee, Performance Bond & Striking Out Defences 30 Jan 2024 UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	30 Jan 2024	UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of AR Chong dismissed; judgment entered against the first defendant for US$63.3m with interest and costs.
3	Lum Ooi Lin v Hyflux Ltd: Appeal on Security for Costs & Court's Discretion 29 Nov 2023 Patrick Bance (Respondent, Appellant)Won	29 Nov 2023	Patrick Bance (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; the court accepted the Omni Undertaking as an adequate form of security. No specific monetary amount was awarded, but costs were awarded to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Hyflux Ltd v Lum Ooi Lin: Security for Costs - Litigation Funding Undertaking 27 Apr 2023 Patrick Bance (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	27 Apr 2023	Patrick Bance (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; security for costs to be furnished by way of an undertaking to the court jointly by Omni Bridgeway Limited and Omni Bridgeway (Singapore) Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	OCBC v STI ORCHARD: Misdelivery, Bills of Lading & Trade Financing 22 May 2022 Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “STI ORCHARD” (Defendant)Won	22 May 2022	Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “STI ORCHARD” (Defendant): Unconditional leave to defend grantedThe court granted the defendant unconditional leave to defend.
6	Affle Global Pte Ltd v OSLabs Pte Ltd: Validity of Resolutions for Share Purchase 24 Mar 2022 Affle Global Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	24 Mar 2022	Affle Global Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Applications dismissedAffle's applications in OS 800 and SUM 3963 were dismissed. Affle was ordered to pay costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Lin Jianwei v Tung Yu-Lien Margaret: Raffles Town Club Dispute over Company Act s216A and Appeal Leave 01 Jul 2021 Lin Jianwei (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	01 Jul 2021	Lin Jianwei (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedLin's appeals were dismissed, and he was ordered to pay Tung $40,000 in costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Tecnomar v SBM Offshore: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Material Non-Disclosure 10 Nov 2020 SBM Offshore N V (Defendant, Respondent)Won	10 Nov 2020	SBM Offshore N V (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the defendant, with costs to be paid by the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Sinfeng Marine v Taylor: Winding Up, Creditors' Liquidators & Examination Orders 08 Oct 2020 Cosco Petroleum Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Won	08 Oct 2020	Cosco Petroleum Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs and disbursements in the total sum of $40,000 to be paid by the respondents. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Law Society of Singapore v Yeo Siew Chye Troy: Disciplinary Proceedings for Failure to Supervise Employee Leading to Misappropriation 28 Apr 2019 Yeo Siew Chye Troy (Respondent)Lost	28 Apr 2019	Yeo Siew Chye Troy (Respondent): Suspension of four yearsThe Court imposed a suspension of four years on the respondent and ordered the respondent to pay the applicant costs in the aggregate sum of $6,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Ezion Holdings Ltd v Credit Suisse AG: Defamation Claim & Striking Out Plea of Malice 01 Jun 2017 Ezion Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	01 Jun 2017	Ezion Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Ezion ordered to pay costs of $4,000 with reasonable disbursements to Credit Suisse. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Yap Sing Lee v MCST Plan No 1267: Disclosure of Information & Legal Privilege under BMSMA 27 Jan 2011 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1267 (Respondent)Won	27 Jan 2011	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1267 (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $20,000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Credit Suisse v Lim Soon Fang Bryan: Examination of Witnesses in Foreign Jurisdiction 11 Apr 2007 Lim Soon Fang Bryan (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	11 Apr 2007	Lim Soon Fang Bryan (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissed.The defendant's appeal to set aside the order for examination of witnesses in Taiwan was dismissed.
14	Colliers International v Senkee Logistics: Agency Agreement & Commission Dispute 31 Jan 2007 Colliers International (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	31 Jan 2007	Colliers International (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for commission was dismissed as the court found no contractual relationship and that the plaintiff was not the effective cause of the sale. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Otech Pakistan v Clough Engineering: Breach of Oral Contract & Inducement Claim 29 Mar 2006 Otech Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Mar 2006	Otech Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedOtech's claim against Clough Engineering Ltd was dismissed with costs.
16	Hub Warrior v QBE Insurance: Negligence, Marine Insurance & Rectification 27 Dec 2004 Hub Warrior Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Dec 2004	Hub Warrior Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for damages and rectification was dismissed with costs.
17	L & M Geotechnic v CEP Instruments: Setting Aside Default Judgment & Proof of Debt in Winding Up 13 Sep 2004 L & M Geotechnic Pte Ltd (Petitioner)Won	13 Sep 2004	L & M Geotechnic Pte Ltd (Petitioner): Judgment dated 22 July 2002 to stand; Liquidators to accept the Proof of Debt filed by L & M on 11 November 2002The court ordered that the judgment dated 22 July 2002 was to stand and the liquidators were to accept the proof of debt filed by L & M on 11 November 2002.
18	Tong Guan Food Products v Ong Leong Chuan: Appeal on Costs Order Refusal 22 Apr 2004 Another (Intervener, Appellant)Lost	22 Apr 2004	Another (Intervener, Appellant): LostSecond intervener's appeal dismissed. No costs were awarded to the interveners (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Bassatne v El Gohary: Enforceability of MOU in Oil Trading Joint Venture 28 Mar 2004 Bakri Trading Company Inc. (Defendant)Dismissed	28 Mar 2004	Bakri Trading Company Inc. (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs’ claim against the third defendant is dismissed with costs, without prejudice to the claim or counterclaim as the case may be of BBEA, in relation to the ad hoc joint ventures for cargoes with the third defendants. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Kiyue v Aquagen: Derivative Action & Arbitration - Interpretation of 'Action' under Companies Act 17 Jul 2003 Kiyue Company Limited (Applicant)Lost	17 Jul 2003	Kiyue Company Limited (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to intervene in arbitration dismissed.
21	BNP Paribas v Bandung Shipping: Wrongful Cargo Discharge & Letters of Indemnity 11 May 2003 Bandung Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	11 May 2003	Bandung Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantJudgment against Bandung Shipping Pte Ltd with costs and damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Afro Asia Shipping v Haridass Ho: Striking Out Action & Interpretation of Consent Order 09 Feb 2003 Afro-Asia Shipping Co (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	09 Feb 2003	Afro-Asia Shipping Co (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to both defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Goh Chin Soon v Vickers Capital: Mortgagee's Duty of Care & Bankruptcy 29 Dec 2000 Vickers Capital Ltd (fka St. Capital Ltd) (Defendant, Respondent)Won	29 Dec 2000	Vickers Capital Ltd (fka St. Capital Ltd) (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of the defendant.
24	Sintalow Hardware v Ricwil: Dispute over Goods, Services & Fiduciary Duties 12 Jun 2000 Sintalow Hardware Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	12 Jun 2000	Sintalow Hardware Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Sintalow in the amount of $145,082.12 plus interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).