Choa Joo Liang v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Mandatory Death Sentence for Drug Trafficking
In Choa Joo Liang v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of Singapore heard an appeal by Choa Joo Liang against his sentence of death for possession of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act. The High Court had convicted Choa Joo Liang and sentenced him to death. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, holding that the death penalty was mandatory for trafficking more than 15g of diamorphine.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
Court of Appeal1.2 Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
1.3 Case Type
Criminal
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Choa Joo Liang appealed against his mandatory death sentence for possession of diamorphine for trafficking. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, affirming the death sentence.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Prosecutor | Respondent | Government Agency | Death sentence affirmed | Won | Benjamin Yim of Deputy Public Prosecutor |
Choa Joo Liang | Appellant | Individual | Appeal dismissed | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Chao Hick Tin | Justice of Appeal | No |
Lai Kew Chai | Judge | Yes |
Yong Pung How | Chief Justice | No |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Benjamin Yim | Deputy Public Prosecutor |
Loo Khee Sheng | K S Loo and Co |
Kelvin Lim Phuan Foo | Kelvin Lim and Partners |
4. Facts
- The appellant was charged with possession of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking.
- CNB officers raided a residence and found the appellant squatting in the toilet.
- Packets of granular substance containing 103.15g of diamorphine were recovered.
- Drug trafficking paraphernalia were found in the residence.
- The appellant admitted to drug-trafficking activities in his statements.
- The appellant elected to remain silent at trial.
5. Formal Citations
- Choa Joo Liang v Public Prosecutor, Cr App 14/2004, [2005] SGCA 15
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
CNB officers raided Block 537 Bukit Panjang Ring Road #19-831. | |
Appeal dismissed. |
7. Legal Issues
- Whether the appellant could appeal against the death sentence imposed on the ground that it was manifestly excessive
- Outcome: The court held that the death sentence was mandatory and the appeal was dismissed.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Appeal against sentence
9. Cause of Actions
- Possession of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking
10. Practice Areas
- Criminal Appeals
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nguyen Tuong Van v PP | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2005] 1 SLR 103 | Singapore | Cited as precedent for the mandatory death penalty for importing more than 15g of diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2001 Rev Ed) s 5 | Singapore |
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2001 Rev Ed) s 33 | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Diamorphine
- Trafficking
- Mandatory death penalty
- Misuse of Drugs Act
- CNB
- Sentence
- Appeal
15.2 Keywords
- Drug trafficking
- Death penalty
- Singapore
- Criminal law
- Appeal
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Trafficking of Drugs | 98 |
Misuse of Drugs Act | 95 |
Criminal Law | 90 |
Sentencing | 80 |
Offences | 70 |
16. Subjects
- Criminal Law
- Drug Trafficking
- Sentencing