Choa Joo Liang v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Mandatory Death Sentence for Drug Trafficking

In Choa Joo Liang v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of Singapore heard an appeal by Choa Joo Liang against his sentence of death for possession of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act. The High Court had convicted Choa Joo Liang and sentenced him to death. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, holding that the death penalty was mandatory for trafficking more than 15g of diamorphine.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal

1.2 Outcome

Appeal dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Choa Joo Liang appealed against his mandatory death sentence for possession of diamorphine for trafficking. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, affirming the death sentence.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyDeath sentence affirmedWon
Benjamin Yim of Deputy Public Prosecutor
Choa Joo LiangAppellantIndividualAppeal dismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chao Hick TinJustice of AppealNo
Lai Kew ChaiJudgeYes
Yong Pung HowChief JusticeNo

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The appellant was charged with possession of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking.
  2. CNB officers raided a residence and found the appellant squatting in the toilet.
  3. Packets of granular substance containing 103.15g of diamorphine were recovered.
  4. Drug trafficking paraphernalia were found in the residence.
  5. The appellant admitted to drug-trafficking activities in his statements.
  6. The appellant elected to remain silent at trial.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Choa Joo Liang v Public Prosecutor, Cr App 14/2004, [2005] SGCA 15

6. Timeline

DateEvent
CNB officers raided Block 537 Bukit Panjang Ring Road #19-831.
Appeal dismissed.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Whether the appellant could appeal against the death sentence imposed on the ground that it was manifestly excessive
    • Outcome: The court held that the death sentence was mandatory and the appeal was dismissed.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Appeal against sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Possession of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Appeals

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Nguyen Tuong Van v PPCourt of AppealYes[2005] 1 SLR 103SingaporeCited as precedent for the mandatory death penalty for importing more than 15g of diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2001 Rev Ed) s 5Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2001 Rev Ed) s 33Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Diamorphine
  • Trafficking
  • Mandatory death penalty
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • CNB
  • Sentence
  • Appeal

15.2 Keywords

  • Drug trafficking
  • Death penalty
  • Singapore
  • Criminal law
  • Appeal

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Trafficking
  • Sentencing