Goh Chok Tong v Chee Soon Juan: Defamation Damages Assessment - Alleged Mishandling of National Funds

In 2005, the High Court of Singapore, presided over by Justice Kan Ting Chiu, ruled in favor of Goh Chok Tong in a defamation suit against Chee Soon Juan. The case arose from statements made by Chee during the 2001 Parliamentary General Elections, where he alleged that Goh had mishandled national funds by loaning $17 billion to Suharto. The court found that Chee's statements were defamatory and awarded Goh $300,000 in damages. The court considered the seriousness of the slander, the standing of both parties, the extent of publication, the conduct of the parties, and the effect of the defamation on the plaintiff.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for Plaintiff

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Defamation case where Goh Chok Tong sued Chee Soon Juan for alleging mishandling of funds. The court assessed damages, awarding $300,000 to Goh.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Chee Soon JuanDefendantIndividualJudgment against DefendantLost
Goh Chok TongPlaintiffIndividualJudgment for PlaintiffWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Kan Ting ChiuJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The defendant alleged the plaintiff mishandled the nation's funds by loaning $17 billion to Suharto.
  2. The statements were made during the 2001 Parliamentary General Elections.
  3. The plaintiff was the Prime Minister of Singapore at the time.
  4. The defendant was the Secretary-General of the Singapore Democratic Party.
  5. The defendant issued three apologies, but the plaintiff was not placated.
  6. The defendant delayed the progress of the action.
  7. The defendant claimed the apology was the result of threat and intimidation.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Goh Chok Tong v Chee Soon Juan (No 2), Suit 1460/2001, [2005] SGHC 3

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Defamatory statements made by the defendant during election campaigning.
Lee Kuan Yew demanded the defendant withdraw the allegations and apologise to the plaintiff.
Defendant issued first apology.
Defendant issued second apology.
Plaintiff's solicitors informed the defendant he had falsely accused the plaintiff.
Defendant read out an apology at a rally at Jurong East.
Apology published in The Straits Times and Today newspapers.
Interlocutory judgment entered for the plaintiff.
Directions given for assessment of damages.
Assessment hearing began.
Judgment reserved.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Defamation
    • Outcome: The court found that the defendant defamed the plaintiff.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [1998] 1 SLR 97
      • [1998] 3 SLR 337
      • [1975] AC 135
  2. Assessment of Damages
    • Outcome: The court assessed damages at $300,000.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Related Cases:
      • [1998] 1 SLR 97
      • [1998] 3 SLR 337

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Defamation

10. Practice Areas

  • Litigation

11. Industries

  • Politics

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Tang Liang Hong v Lee Kuan YewCourt of AppealYes[1998] 1 SLR 97SingaporeCited for the principle that damages for defamation should not rise steadily and significantly over time.
Goh Chok Tong v Jeyaretnam Joshua BenjaminCourt of AppealYes[1998] 3 SLR 337SingaporeCited as a guide on the assessment of damages in defamation cases involving the Prime Minister.
Horrocks v LoweN/AYes[1975] AC 135N/ACited for the authority on malice.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Defamation
  • Damages
  • Slander
  • Apology
  • Parliamentary General Elections
  • Loan to Suharto

15.2 Keywords

  • Defamation
  • Goh Chok Tong
  • Chee Soon Juan
  • Singapore
  • Damages
  • Assessment
  • Prime Minister
  • Singapore Democratic Party
  • Loan
  • Suharto

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Defamation
  • Tort
  • Civil Litigation