Goh Chok Tong
Goh Chok Tong is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 60.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Goh Chok Tong has been represented by 3 law firms and 6 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Drew & Napier LLC | 2 cases |
Drew and Napier LLC | 1 case |
Allen & Gledhill | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Goh Chok Tong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 6.2
- Complex Cases
- 3 (60.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Neutral | 37.7 parties avg |
Won | 12.0 parties avg |
16.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2007 | 113.0 parties avg |
2005 | 12.0 parties avg |
2002 | 35.3 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Goh Chok Tong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Neutral | 3(60.0%) |
Won | 1(20.0%) |
1(20.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 150,000.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2007 | 1 1 |
2005 | 1 1 |
2002 | 2 21 |
Case History
Displaying all 5 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
31 May 2007 | Respondent | NeutralAppeal allowed in part, with a conditional discharge granted to the appellant. |
05 Jan 2005 | Plaintiff | WonJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $300,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
06 Jun 2002 | Plaintiff | NeutralThe application for ad hoc admission of Queen's Counsel to represent the defendant was dismissed. |
17 Apr 2002 | Plaintiff | NeutralPlaintiff in the underlying defamation suit. The outcome of this application does not directly impact the outcome of the underlying suit. |
30 Jan 2002 | Other | Unknown |