Thor Beng Huat v Public Prosecutor: High Court Upholds Restraint Orders Under Corruption, Drug Trafficking Act

In Thor Beng Huat v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of Singapore heard an application by Thor Beng Huat to discharge restraint orders made under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act. The Public Prosecutor sought to prevent Thor from disposing of assets believed to be derived from criminal conduct. The High Court, Choo Han Teck J presiding, dismissed the application, finding that the court had jurisdiction to make such orders prior to conviction and that there were reasonable grounds to believe the assets were linked to illegal activities. The court found that the applicant's assets were legitimately his.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Application dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court upheld restraint orders against Thor Beng Huat under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes Act.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Thor Beng HuatApplicantIndividualApplication dismissedLostSpencer Gwee, Kertar Singh
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyOrders upheldWonLee Lit Cheng

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Lee Lit ChengPublic Prosecutor
Spencer GweeSpencer Gwee & Co
Kertar SinghKertar & Co

4. Facts

  1. Thor Beng Huat applied to discharge orders restraining him from disposing of assets.
  2. The assets included a Porsche, proceeds from the sale of a Maserati and Lamborghini, and money in bank accounts.
  3. The orders were made under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act.
  4. Thor was informed he could be prosecuted for an offence under s 408 read with s 109 of the Penal Code.
  5. Investigators believed some of the money from the misappropriation of computer chips was transferred to Thor.
  6. Thor's income increased significantly between 1998 and 2004.
  7. Thor purchased three luxury cars within 12 months, costing more than his annual income.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Re Thor Beng Huat, OS 1155/2006, SUM 2575/2006, [2006] SGHC 166

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Similar orders were made by Tan Lee Meng J
Similar orders were made by Belinda Ang Saw Ean J
Applicant returned to jurisdiction
Public Prosecutor obtained a further extension from Tan J
Injunction order was made ex parte by Kan Ting Chiu J
Application dismissed

7. Legal Issues

  1. Jurisdiction to make restraint orders prior to conviction
    • Outcome: The court held that it has jurisdiction to make such orders prior to conviction.
    • Category: Jurisdictional
  2. Grounds to discharge restraint orders
    • Outcome: The court held that there were insufficient grounds to discharge the orders.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Discharge of restraint orders

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act (Cap 65A, 2000 Rev Ed)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 68)Singapore
Penal Code, (Cap 224, 1985 Rev Ed)Singapore
s 15 Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act (Cap 65A, 2000 Rev Ed)Singapore
s 16 Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act (Cap 65A, 2000 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Restraint order
  • Realisable property
  • Ex parte application
  • Drug trafficking offence
  • Serious offence
  • Confiscation of benefits

15.2 Keywords

  • Restraint order
  • Confiscation
  • Criminal law
  • Singapore
  • High Court

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Jurisdiction
  • Restraint Orders

17. Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Confiscation of Benefits
  • Injunctions