Kertar & Co

Kertar & Co is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2014. The firm has handled 22 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 9 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and child custody. Their track record shows a 8.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 27.3% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kertar & Co has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	12 cases	32.4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80.31% relevance score	Kertar & Co has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 32.4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	8.1% of total caseload	Experienced52.50% relevance score	Kertar & Co has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8.1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5.4% of total caseload	Experienced56.67% relevance score	Kertar & Co has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.4% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	2 cases	5.4% of total caseload	General Practice46.67% relevance score	Kertar & Co has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.4% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	2 cases	5.4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Kertar & Co has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	5.4% of total caseload	Experienced63.33% relevance score	Kertar & Co has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	5.4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95.00% relevance score	Kertar & Co has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5.4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2.7% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	Kertar & Co has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.7% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2.7% of total caseload	General Practice20.00% relevance score	Kertar & Co has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.7% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	2.7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	Kertar & Co has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Kertar & Co has 9 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 8 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Singa Retnam	8 cases	36.4% of firm's cases	2012 sghc 57(Mar 2012)
Kertar Singh	8 cases	36.4% of firm's cases	2012 sghc 48(Mar 2012) 2006 sghc 166(Sep 2006) 2003 sghc 17(Feb 2003)
Sarbrinder Singh	5 cases	22.7% of firm's cases	2014 sghcr 12(Jun 2014) 2007 sgca 35(Jul 2007) 2007 sghc 43(Mar 2007)
Kertar Singh s/o Guljar Singh	3 cases	13.6% of firm's cases	2011 sghc 205(Sep 2011) 2011 sghc 11(Jan 2011) 2009 sghc 64(Mar 2009)
K Jayakumar Naidu	1 cases	4.5% of firm's cases	2008 sghc 120(Jul 2008)
Anil Singh	1 cases	4.5% of firm's cases	2012 sghc 48(Mar 2012)
Anil Singh Sandhu s/o Kertar Singh	1 cases	4.5% of firm's cases	2011 sghc 205(Sep 2011)
Hope Wee	1 cases	4.5% of firm's cases	2010 sgca 15(Apr 2010)
Amaladass	1 cases	4.5% of firm's cases	2008 sghc 139(Aug 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kertar & Co's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 6 (27.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	183.0 parties avg	3.0	75.0%
Partial	34.0 parties avg	4.0	12.5%
Won	23.3 parties avg	3.3	8.3%
Dismissed	16.0 parties avg	6.0	4.2%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2002	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2008	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	34.5 parties avg	4.5
2012	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kertar & Co's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	18(75.0%)	75.0%
Partial	3(12.5%)	12.5%
Won	2(8.3%)	8.3%
Dismissed	1(4.2%)	4.2%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1212369.2	110215.387 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	03 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2002	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2006	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2007	011 11	Partial: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2008	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	03 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2012	0121 121	Dismissed: 1 cases (0.8%) Lost: 2 cases (1.7%) Partial: 1 cases (0.8%)
2014	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Kertar & Co in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Basil Anthony HermanApplicant, Defendant, Appellant, Defendant Lost (2)Partial (1)	Applicant, Defendant, Appellant, Defendant	3 cases	Lost (2)Partial (1)
Thor Beng HuatApplicant Lost (2)	Applicant	2 cases	Lost (2)
NLRespondent, Husband, Respondent Partial (1)Lost (1)	Respondent, Husband, Respondent	2 cases	Partial (1)Lost (1)
GT Payment Pte LtdDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Lim Ai ChengDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Yong June Meng GaryDefendant Dismissed (1)	Defendant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Yong Kheng LeongDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Quek Hock LyeDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
SOUTH EAST ENTERPRISES (SINGAPORE) PTE LTDPlaintiff, Appellant Lost (1)	Plaintiff, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Noorazni bin IthninDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ung Yoke HooiApplicant Lost (1)	Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)
Daniel Vijay s/o KatherasanDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Dallas Entertainment Pte LtdDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Sim Kay TeckDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Than Stenly Granida PurwantoAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Chandara Sagaran s/o RengayahAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Peh Thian HuiDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tan Suan Kheng @ Tan Lim KhengAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ashok Kumar GiriDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Solaiyan ArumugamDefense Lost (1)	Defense	1 case	Lost (1)
Tan Bock HuatAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)