PP v Mohamed Fadzli: Gang Robbery, Rape, Voluntarily Causing Hurt - Sentencing
In Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Fadzli bin Abdul Rahim, the High Court of Singapore sentenced Mohamed Fadzli for gang robbery, rape, and voluntarily causing hurt to three victims. The court, presided over by Tay Yong Kwang J, sentenced the accused to a total of 22 years imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane, considering the severity of the crimes and the need for deterrence. The accused pleaded guilty to three charges, with three other charges taken into consideration.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Accused sentenced to a total of 22 years imprisonment with effect from 15 May 2007 and the maximum of 24 strokes of the cane.
1.3 Case Type
Criminal
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Mohamed Fadzli sentenced for gang robbery and rape with hurt. The court considered mitigating factors and sentencing principles.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Prosecutor | Prosecution | Government Agency | Judgment for Prosecution | Won | Shahla Iqbal of Deputy Public Prosecutors Shawn Ho of Deputy Public Prosecutors |
Mohamed Fadzli bin Abdul Rahim | Defendant | Individual | Sentenced | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Tay Yong Kwang | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Shahla Iqbal | Deputy Public Prosecutors |
Shawn Ho | Deputy Public Prosecutors |
Sunil Sudheesan | KhattarWong |
4. Facts
- The accused pleaded guilty to three charges of gang robbery and rape with hurt.
- The accused was involved in the gang robbery and rape of Victim 1 on 1 April 2006.
- The accused was involved in the rape of Victim 3 on 12 August 2006.
- The accused's accomplices have been dealt with separately in other courts.
- The accused was working as a flight supervisor at the airport before his arrest.
- The accused and his accomplices planned the robberies and rapes.
- Victim 1 and Victim 3 were viciously assaulted and beaten into submission.
5. Formal Citations
- Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Fadzli bin Abdul Rahim, CC 20/2007, [2007] SGHC 177
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Accused fined $1,000 for driving a motor vehicle without lawful authority | |
Victim 1 arrived in Singapore | |
Gang robbery and rape of Victim 1 | |
Robbery of Victim 2 | |
Victim 3 arrived in Singapore | |
Rape and robbery of Victim 3 | |
Mohamad Norhazri arrested | |
Accused arrested | |
Accused released on bail | |
Bail for the accused was revoked by the High Court | |
Decision Date |
7. Legal Issues
- Sentencing Principles
- Outcome: The court considered the sentencing principles, including benchmark sentences, the plea of guilt, and the one transaction and totality principles, in determining the appropriate sentence.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Benchmark sentences
- Plea of guilt discount
- One transaction principle
- Totality principle
- Complicity in Gang Robbery and Rape
- Outcome: The court considered the accused's role and level of involvement in the gang robbery and rape.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Imprisonment
- Caning
9. Cause of Actions
- Gang Robbery
- Rape
- Voluntarily Causing Hurt
10. Practice Areas
- Criminal Law
- Sentencing
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chia Kim Heng Frederick v PP | Court of Appeal | Yes | [1992] 1 SLR 361 | Singapore | Cited for benchmark sentence of 10 years imprisonment and caning of not less than 6 strokes for an adult offender found guilty of rape under s 376(1) of the Penal Code after trial. |
PP v NF | High Court | Yes | [2006] 4 SLR 849 | Singapore | Cited for principles pertaining to the offence of rape and guidelines in dealing with this offence, and for the proposition that a plea of guilt did not automatically entitle an offender to a discount in sentence. |
Robert Anak Imbak v PP | District Court | Yes | Robert Anak Imbak v PP [2002] SGDC 326 | Singapore | Cited as a sentencing precedent for gang robbery. |
Yeo Kee How v PP | District Court | Yes | Yeo Kee How v PP (MA 312/1992 – unreported) | Singapore | Cited as a sentencing precedent for gang robbery. |
R v William Christopher Millberry | English Court of Appeal | Yes | R v William Christopher Millberry [2003] 2 Cr App R (S) 31 | England | Cited for the sentencing practice of the English courts for rape offences. |
R v Keith Billam | N/A | Yes | R v Keith Billam (1986) 8 Cr App R (S) 48 | N/A | Cited for the analytical sentencing framework established in the leading case for rape offences. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Penal Code, Chapter 224, section 395 | Singapore |
Penal Code, Chapter 224, section 376(2)(a) | Singapore |
Penal Code, Chapter 224, section 377 | Singapore |
Penal Code, Chapter 224, section 392 read with section 34 | Singapore |
Penal Code, Chapter 224, section 394 | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 1985 Rev Ed), Section 18 | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 1985 Ed), Section 230 | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Gang Robbery
- Rape
- Voluntarily Causing Hurt
- Sentencing
- Complicity
- Benchmark Sentences
- Mitigating Factors
- Aggravating Factors
15.2 Keywords
- Gang Robbery
- Rape
- Sentencing
- Criminal Law
- Singapore
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Sentencing | 95 |
Criminal Law | 95 |
Gang-robbery | 90 |
Criminal Procedure | 90 |
Offences | 90 |
Rape | 90 |
Complicity | 70 |
Voluntarily Causing Hurt | 70 |
Abetment | 60 |
Personal Injury | 50 |
16. Subjects
- Criminal Law
- Sentencing