Gang-robbery

Gang-robbery is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 6 cases from 2004 to 2022.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Gang-robbery, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Deputy Public Prosecutors100.00% success rate2 cases33.3% of area
Attorney-General’s Chambers50.00% success rate2 cases33.3% of area
Kalco Law LLC0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Prosecution100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Law Society’s Criminal Legal Aid Scheme0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
KhattarWong0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Tan Rajah and Cheah0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
David Lim and Partners0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
C Y Fong and Co0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
John Tay and Co0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Gang-robbery, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Huo Jiongrui100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Sunil Sudheesan0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Charlene Tay Chia0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Yeo Kee Teng Mark0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Ng Cho Yang Justin0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Sadhana Rai0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Hri Kumar Nair0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Abraham S Vergis0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Chua Ying-Hong100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Timotheus Koh100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 6 most recent judgments out of 6 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Public Prosecutor v Mahadi bin Muhamad Mukhtar: Robbery with Firearm by Auxiliary Police OfficerGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore12 Sep 2022
Accused convicted and sentenced to imprisonment and caning.
2PP v Mohd Ariffan: Adducing Fresh Evidence on Appeal in Sexual Offence CaseCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore13 Feb 2018
The Prosecution's application to admit the affidavits of Matin, Superintendent Chua, and Assistant Superintendent Jaga was dismissed. The application to admit the evidence of Ms. Ng was allowed in part. Ms. Ng's affidavit, section 7, and paragraphs 5.3.4 and 5.5 of the expert report are admitted as further evidence in this appeal.
3Public Prosecutor v Shamsul bin Sa’at: Aggravated Rape, Sexual Assault, and HousebreakingHigh Court29 Apr 2010
Accused sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of 25 years and 24 strokes of the cane.
4-11 May 2008
Unknown
5PP v Mohamed Fadzli: Gang Robbery, Rape, Voluntarily Causing Hurt - SentencingHigh Court11 Oct 2007
Accused sentenced to a total of 22 years imprisonment with effect from 15 May 2007 and the maximum of 24 strokes of the cane.
6Public Prosecutor v Somrak Senkham: Robbery with Hurt and Immigration OffencesHigh Court10 Aug 2004
Both accused sentenced to imprisonment and caning for robbery with hurt. First accused also sentenced for immigration offence.