Ng Gino Ernest v Triathlon Association of Singapore: Application for Judicial Review of National Team Nomination

Ng Gino Ernest applied to the High Court of Singapore for leave to seek judicial review against the Triathlon Association of Singapore's decision not to nominate him for the 2007 South-East Asian Games. Ng Gino Ernest argued that the association breached its selection policy and natural justice. Choo Han Teck J granted leave to apply for judicial review, finding that Ng Gino Ernest had presented a case requiring a response from the association.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Leave to apply for judicial review granted.

1.3 Case Type

Judicial Review

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Application for judicial review of the Triathlon Association of Singapore's decision not to nominate Ng Gino Ernest for the national team.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Ng Gino ErnestApplicantIndividualLeave to apply for judicial review grantedWon
Triathlon Association of SingaporeRespondentAssociationLeave to apply for judicial review grantedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The applicant was not nominated for the Singapore national team of triathletes.
  2. The applicant competed in two time trials as per the respondent's selection policy.
  3. The applicant placed second in the second time trial.
  4. Mr. Phoon, who was nominated, did not complete the first time trial.
  5. The applicant alleged that Mr. Phoon's nomination occurred before the second time trial.
  6. The applicant appealed the respondent's decision, but the appeal was rejected.
  7. The applicant claimed the appeal hearing was unfair due to interjections and bias.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Ng Gino Ernest v Triathlon Association of Singapore, OS 1499/2007, [2007] SGHC 183

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Applicant requested the respondent to reconsider its decision.
Applicant requested the respondent to convene an appeals committee.
Appeal heard by the appeals committee.
Leave to apply for judicial review granted.
South-East Asian Games scheduled to be held.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Natural Justice
    • Outcome: The court found that the applicant had sufficiently made out a case which required a response.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Bias
      • Fair Hearing
  2. Breach of Selection Policy
    • Outcome: The court found that the applicant had sufficiently made out a case which required a response.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Orders against the respondent association

9. Cause of Actions

  • Judicial Review

10. Practice Areas

  • Public Law
  • Sports Dispute Resolution

11. Industries

  • Sports

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Order 53 r 1(2) Rules of CourtSingapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Judicial Review
  • Natural Justice
  • Selection Policy
  • Nomination
  • Triathlon
  • South-East Asian Games
  • Appeals Committee

15.2 Keywords

  • Judicial Review
  • Triathlon
  • Singapore
  • Nomination
  • Sports Law

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Administrative Law
  • Sports Law