Paul Ong Min-Tse

Paul Ong Min-Tse is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in administrative law and legal profession act. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated expertise across 39 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Related Party Transactions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Horse Racing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Solicitors' Accounts Rules	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fair Hearing Rule	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Societies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rule against bias	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ultra vires	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Oppressive Conduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unfairly Prejudicial Conduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Paul Ong Min-Tse has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Paul Ong Min-Tse has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	5 cases	71% of cases	Tomolugen v Silica: Arbitrability of Minority Oppression & Stay of Proceedings(Oct 2015) Law Society of Singapore v Tay Choon Leng: Solicitor's Accounts Rules & Professional Conduct(Apr 2012) Deutsche Bank v Lam Chi Kin David: Bankruptcy Proceedings Stay Pending Appeal(Jul 2010)
Paul Ong Chambers LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	Li See Kit Lawrence v Debate Association (Singapore): Breach of Contract, Negligence, Natural Justice, and Ultra Vires Action(May 2023)
Allen & Gledhill	1 cases	14% of cases	Re Caplan Jonathan Michael QC: Application for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Jockey's Appeal(Jul 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Paul Ong Min-Tse's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	43%
Partial	33.0 parties avg	3.0	43%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Paul Ong Min-Tse's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(43%)	43%
Partial	3(43%)	43%
Won	1(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	115,000.00	23,000.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Li See Kit Lawrence v Debate Association (Singapore): Breach of Contract, Negligence, Natural Justice, and Ultra Vires Action 22 May 2023 Li See Kit Lawrence (Plaintiff)Partial	22 May 2023	Li See Kit Lawrence (Plaintiff): Claim Allowed in PartPlaintiff's claim allowed in part. Declarations granted that the Ban and Notice to Partners were unlawful. No monetary damages awarded.
2	Tomolugen v Silica: Arbitrability of Minority Oppression & Stay of Proceedings 25 Oct 2015 SILICA INVESTORS LIMITED (Respondent)Partial	25 Oct 2015	SILICA INVESTORS LIMITED (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part.
3	Law Society of Singapore v Tay Choon Leng: Solicitor's Accounts Rules & Professional Conduct 19 Apr 2012 Tay Choon Leng, John (Respondent)Lost	19 Apr 2012	Tay Choon Leng, John (Respondent): Penalty ImposedRespondent ordered to pay a penalty of $15,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore) and bear the costs of the Law Society.
4	Deutsche Bank v Lam Chi Kin David: Bankruptcy Proceedings Stay Pending Appeal 27 Jul 2010 Deutsche Bank AG (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	27 Jul 2010	Deutsche Bank AG (Plaintiff, Respondent): PartialThe amount of security was varied from $500,000 to $100,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Over & Over Ltd v Bonvests: Minority Oppression & Rights Issue Dispute 30 Nov 2008 Over & Over Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Nov 2008	Over & Over Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedOver & Over Ltd's claim for relief against oppressive and/or unfairly prejudicial conduct was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
6	Ng Gino Ernest v Triathlon Association of Singapore: Application for Judicial Review of National Team Nomination 23 Oct 2007 Ng Gino Ernest (Applicant)Won	23 Oct 2007	Ng Gino Ernest (Applicant): Leave to apply for judicial review grantedLeave to apply for judicial review granted.
7	Re Caplan Jonathan Michael QC: Application for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Jockey's Appeal 18 Jul 2006 Jonathan Michael Caplan (Applicant)Lost	18 Jul 2006	Jonathan Michael Caplan (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication to be admitted as an advocate and solicitor for the purpose of arguing the appeal was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).