Christopher Anand s/o Daniel

Christopher Anand s/o Daniel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 35 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and appellate practice. Their track record shows a 37.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 21 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated expertise across 111 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	16 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	12 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	11 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	10 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	7 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	7 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	7 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joinder	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Beneficiaries Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Probate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Claim	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Probate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Assets Distribution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Juvenile Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ship Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contentious Business Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent powers	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Administration of Insolvent Estates	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Freezing Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidator	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Action in rem	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Christopher Anand s/o Daniel has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 34 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Advocatus Law LLP	34 cases	97% of cases	Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Henderson Doctrine & Abuse of Process in Solicitor Conflict Case(Nov 2024) Kassimatis & Fitzgerald v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission for Constitutional Challenge to Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2024) Hin Leong Trading v Lim Oon Kuin: Disposition of Property under Insolvency Act(Oct 2024)
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 cases	3% of cases	Ng Gino Ernest v Triathlon Association of Singapore: Application for Judicial Review of National Team Nomination(Oct 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Christopher Anand s/o Daniel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.7
Complex Cases: 21 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Lost	143.9 parties avg	3.9	40%
Neutral	28.8 parties avg	8.8	6%
Partial	53.4 parties avg	3.4	14%
Won	134.9 parties avg	4.9	37%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	35.0 parties avg	5.0
2016	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2018	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	43.3 parties avg	3.3
2021	35.3 parties avg	5.3
2022	34.6 parties avg	4.6
2023	55.4 parties avg	5.4
2024	66.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Christopher Anand s/o Daniel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(3%)	3%
Lost	14(40%)	40%
Neutral	2(6%)	6%
Partial	5(14%)	14%
Won	13(37%)	37%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,825,347.60	114,084.2316 cases	16
USD	1,520,671.90	760,335.952 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2016	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2018	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2021	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2022	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2023	5 1121	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (20.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2024	6 114	Lost: 1 cases (16.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 4 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 35 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Henderson Doctrine & Abuse of Process in Solicitor Conflict Case 24 Nov 2024 Lim Oon Kuin (Appellant, Applicant)Won	24 Nov 2024	Lim Oon Kuin (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the Henderson doctrine was inapplicable, and there was no general abuse of process.
2	Kassimatis & Fitzgerald v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission for Constitutional Challenge to Misuse of Drugs Act 07 Nov 2024 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Won	07 Nov 2024	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeals by Theodoros Kassimatis KC and Edward Fitzgerald KC dismissed.
3	Hin Leong Trading v Lim Oon Kuin: Disposition of Property under Insolvency Act 24 Oct 2024 Lim Huey Ching (Defendant)Neutral	24 Oct 2024	Lim Huey Ching (Defendant): NeutralThe defendant's interests were considered in the context of the applications, but there was no direct outcome for the defendant.
4	Kassimatis KC v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel & Legal Profession Act Interpretation 24 Sep 2024 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Won	24 Sep 2024	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Appeal against the Preliminary Objection dismissedAppeal against the Preliminary Objection dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (SGD) is assumed.
5	Zhu Su v Three Arrows Capital Ltd: Appeal of Insolvency Order under IRDA 09 May 2024 Kyle Livingston Davies (Applicant)Lost	09 May 2024	Kyle Livingston Davies (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for permission to appeal dismissed; costs of $4,000 inclusive of disbursements awarded against Mr. Davies in favour of the Respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Kassimatis KC v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission & Legal Profession Act 29 Jan 2024 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Won	29 Jan 2024	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentApplications for ad hoc admission were dismissed.
7	PT. OKI Pulp & Paper Mills v Sunrise Industries: Breach of Contract & Bank Guarantee Dispute 21 Nov 2023 Sunrise Industries (India) Ltd (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	21 Nov 2023	Sunrise Industries (India) Ltd (Respondent, Appellant): Partial Appeal AllowedOKI is to refund to Sunrise the sum of US$832,413.20 with pre-judgment interest thereon at 5.33% per annum from 23 May 2019 to the date of judgment. Assumed USD, as the contract was specified in USD.
8	Chan Pik Sun v Wan Hoe Keet: Appeal on Costs Decision and Requirements for Permission to Appeal 16 Nov 2023 Strategic Wealth Consultancy Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	16 Nov 2023	Strategic Wealth Consultancy Pte Ltd (Respondent): Respondents' position upheldThe court upheld the respondents' position regarding the appeal process.
9	Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Striking Out & Amendments in Hin Leong & Ocean Tankers Cases 14 Aug 2023 Lim Huey Ching (Applicant)Lost	14 Aug 2023	Lim Huey Ching (Applicant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Yeo Su Lan v Thomas Hong: Consolidation of Suits & Joinder of Co-Plaintiffs in Counterclaim 23 Feb 2023 The Dim Sum Place (CCP) II Pte Ltd (Defendant in Counterclaim)Neutral	23 Feb 2023	The Dim Sum Place (CCP) II Pte Ltd (Defendant in Counterclaim): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed.
11	Sunrise Industries v PT OKI: Breach of Contract & Bank Guarantee Dispute 05 Jan 2023 Sunrise Industries (India) Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	05 Jan 2023	Sunrise Industries (India) Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment partially in favor of the PlaintiffSunrise was awarded US$688,258.70, with interest at 5.33% from the date of its writ. Assumed USD, as the judgment involves contracts in USD.
12	Seow Fook Sen Aloysius v Rajah & Tann: Guidance on Appeals under Supreme Court of Judicature Act 11 May 2022 Seow Fook Sen Aloysius (Applicant)Dismissed	11 May 2022	Seow Fook Sen Aloysius (Applicant): Application DismissedOriginating Summons dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; leave granted to file with the Appellate Division.
13	Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Joinder, Breach of Confidence & Solicitor Conduct 03 Apr 2022 Lim Chee Meng (Appellant)Won	03 Apr 2022	Lim Chee Meng (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; Rajah & Tann to pay the Lims $40,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Hin Leong Trading v Rajah & Tann: Directors' Powers in Judicial Management 03 Apr 2022 Hin Leong Trading (Pte) Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	03 Apr 2022	Hin Leong Trading (Pte) Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal fixed at $40,000, inclusive of disbursements, to be paid by Mr CM Lim and Ms HC Lim personally. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Ocean Tankers v Rajah & Tann: Joinder Application in Confidentiality Dispute 20 Jun 2021 Hin Leong Trading (Pte) Ltd (in liquidation) (Applicant)Lost	20 Jun 2021	Hin Leong Trading (Pte) Ltd (in liquidation) (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication to prevent Rajah & Tann from acting for the judicial managers was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Ocean Tankers v Rajah & Tann: Striking Out Injunction Actions Due to Lack of Standing 24 Feb 2021 Hin Leong Trading (Pte) Ltd (under judicial management) (Applicant)Lost	24 Feb 2021	Hin Leong Trading (Pte) Ltd (under judicial management) (Applicant): Application DismissedInjunction action struck out.
17	Lew v Nargolwala: Agency, Contract Formation, Trusts & Conflict of Laws 09 Feb 2021 Christian Alfred Larpin (Respondent)Won	09 Feb 2021	Christian Alfred Larpin (Respondent): Claims DismissedClaims against Christian Alfred Larpin dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Siva Kumar v Quek Leng Chuang: Consent Order, Minority Oppression, Share Valuation 04 Nov 2020 Siva Kumar s/o Avadiar (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	04 Nov 2020	Siva Kumar s/o Avadiar (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellant ordered to pay costs of $35,000 to the respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	JWR Pte Ltd v Edmond Pereira Law Corp: Negligence Claim Appeal for Solicitor's Conduct 15 Jul 2020 Edmond Pereira Law Corporation (Respondent)Won	15 Jul 2020	Edmond Pereira Law Corporation (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentAppeal dismissed with costs of $60,000 awarded to the respondents, inclusive of disbursements. The usual consequential orders relating to the security for costs would apply. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Hi-P International Ltd v Tan Chai Hau: Interim Injunction for Breach of Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Clauses 23 Jun 2020 Tan Chai Hau (Chen Zaihao) (Defendant)Partial	23 Jun 2020	Tan Chai Hau (Chen Zaihao) (Defendant): Interim Injunction Granted in PartThe court granted an interim injunction against the first defendant, restraining him from using or revealing specific trade secrets and confidential information.
21	Ho Yu Tat v Chen Kok Siang: Striking Out & Bankrupt's Duty 21 Apr 2020 Joseph Chen & Co (Respondent, Defendant)Won	21 Apr 2020	Joseph Chen & Co (Respondent, Defendant): WonAppeal dismissed; appellant ordered to pay the respondents $20,000 in costs inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	Pradeepto Kumar Biswas v East India Capital Management: Employment Contract Dispute and Fiduciary Duty Breach 07 Aug 2019 East India Capital Management Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff-in-Counterclaim)Lost	07 Aug 2019	East India Capital Management Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff-in-Counterclaim): Counterclaim dismissedEICM's counterclaim against Pradeepto is dismissed.
23	Sia Chin Sun v Yong Wai Poh: Undue Influence, Estate Assets, and Interim Injunction 17 Jun 2018 Yong Wai Poh (Defendant)Lost	17 Jun 2018	Yong Wai Poh (Defendant): Interim Injunction GrantedInterim injunction granted against the defendant, prohibiting disposal of assets up to $1,000,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
24	Ho Seow Wan v Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC: Contentious Business Agreements & Legal Profession Act 05 Feb 2018 Ho Seow Wan (Plaintiff)Lost	05 Feb 2018	Ho Seow Wan (Plaintiff): Taxation application dismissedTaxation application dismissed; Mr. Ho ordered to pay costs of S$6,500 to MLS (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
25	Foo v Tuang: Family Probate Dispute Over Estate Administration 27 Nov 2016 TJH Law Corporation (Defendant)Won	27 Nov 2016	TJH Law Corporation (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantClaims against TJH Law Corporation were dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
26	PP v Mohamad Noor: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 17 Nov 2016 Mohamad Noor Bin Abdullah (Defendant)Lost	17 Nov 2016	Mohamad Noor Bin Abdullah (Defendant): Conviction and SentenceAccused convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to life imprisonment with caning.
27	AKN Marine Supplies v PWM Supply: Admiralty Claim for Ship Management Fees 22 Jun 2016 AKN Marine Supplies Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	22 Jun 2016	AKN Marine Supplies Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for Plaintiff for disbursements in the amount of S$412,196.42 (Singapore Dollars). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	PP v Syed Suhail: Trafficking Conviction under Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Jan 2016 Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin (Defendant)Lost	25 Jan 2016	Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin (Defendant): ConvictedAccused convicted on the trafficking charge and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.
29	Malini Ventura v Knight Capital: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration Agreement Validity 26 Aug 2015 MALINI VENTURA (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Aug 2015	MALINI VENTURA (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application for an interim injunction is dismissed.
30	Foo Jee Boo v Foo Jhee Tuang: Estate Distribution Dispute over Late Father & Mother's Estates 08 Jul 2015 TJH Law Corporation (Defendant)Won	08 Jul 2015	TJH Law Corporation (Defendant): Appeal AllowedThe 2nd Defendant’s appeal in RA 397/2014 in full, and only partially allowed the plaintiffs’ appeal in RA 396/2014.
31	Cheng William v Allister Lim: Negligence Claim Over Shophouse Lease Misrepresentation 15 Mar 2015 Allister Lim & Thrumurgan (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	15 Mar 2015	Allister Lim & Thrumurgan (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAllister Lim & Thrumurgan were found liable for 30% of the damages, amounting to $78,651.18 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
32	STX Corp v Jason Surjana Tanuwidjaja: Contempt of Court for Non-Disclosure of Assets 12 Mar 2014 STX Corp (Plaintiff)Won	12 Mar 2014	STX Corp (Plaintiff): Contempt of court found against defendantsDefendants were found in contempt of court and ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of the contempt proceedings on the indemnity basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
33	Re Andrews Geraldine Mary QC: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel in Singapore 14 Nov 2012 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Lost	14 Nov 2012	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Application OpposedLaw Society of Singapore opposed the application for ad hoc admission.
34	Tong Guan Teck v DBS Bank: Guarantee, Summary Judgment, and Duty of Care 04 Apr 2012 DBS Bank Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	04 Apr 2012	DBS Bank Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal for summary judgment and to strike out the defence and counterclaim was dismissed.
35	Ng Gino Ernest v Triathlon Association of Singapore: Application for Judicial Review of National Team Nomination 23 Oct 2007 Ng Gino Ernest (Applicant)Won	23 Oct 2007	Ng Gino Ernest (Applicant): Leave to apply for judicial review grantedLeave to apply for judicial review granted.