Cavinder Bull

Cavinder Bull is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 84 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in natural forum and judicial review. Their track record shows a 55.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 29 complex cases, representing 35% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cavinder Bull has demonstrated expertise across 256 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	53 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 53 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	30 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 30 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	28 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 28 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	22 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 22 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	19 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 19 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	18 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 18 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	17 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 17 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	17 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	15 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	15 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 15 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	11 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	10 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	10 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	9 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	9 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	8 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	8 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	8 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	7 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	7 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice7% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	3 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Treaty Arbitration	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Comity	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	3 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	3 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	3 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Disputes	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restitution	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insider Trading	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rent Review	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Receivership	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Telecommunications Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shares	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bilateral Investment Treaty	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Agreement	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Permanent Court of Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Valuation Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Nuisance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Procedural fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Procedural fairness	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Documents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Declaratory relief	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Schemes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ponzi Scheme	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Services	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Crime	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Debentures	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private nuisance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Sale Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnerships	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legitimate expectations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Separate legal personality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Wealth	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities and Futures Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral undertaking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Market Manipulation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (University Staff)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Regulation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Good Faith	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rylands v Fletcher Rule	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Alternative Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Rule	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private Education Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Security	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Window Dressing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Portfolio Pumping	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Forecasts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholders Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Global Settlement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake of Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Market Misconduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of statutory duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Creative accounting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Compromise	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Account of Profits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assumption of Risk	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accountants Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Charitable Giving	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Communications and Media	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Regulation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Services Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Regulatory Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patient Confidentiality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Separability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Waiver of objections	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reflective Loss Principle	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Privacy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent powers	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Change of position	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Accounts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Choice of Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reasonableness and Proportionality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bank Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Escrow Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Money Laundering	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quantification of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Registration of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Apportionment of Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Express Warranties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Exclusion Clauses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Auditing Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tiered Dispute Resolution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cavinder Bull has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Cavinder Bull has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 70 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	70 cases	83% of cases	Reliance Infrastructure v. Shanghai Electric: Arbitration Award Challenge Based on Alleged Forgery(Dec 2024) Credit Suisse Trust Ltd v Ivanishvili: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation(Jul 2024) Reliance Infrastructure v Shanghai Electric: SICC Rules on Costs Assessment(Apr 2024)
Drew and Napier LLC	6 cases	7% of cases	Republic of India v. Deutsche Telekom AG: Arbitration Confidentiality & Privacy(Jun 2023) Jenton Overseas Investment v Townsing: Director's Duties & Undue Preference(Feb 2006) Kaufman v Datacraft: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Agreement Interpretation(Sep 2005)
Drew & Napier	6 cases	7% of cases	OpenNet v. Info-Communications: Appeal for Judicial Review Dismissal(Mar 2013) Ong Yew Kew v Attorney-General: Adverse Possession & Strata Title Dispute(Jan 2003) SingTel v IDA: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Restitution Claim for Mistake of Law(Jul 2002)
Drew & Napier LLP	1 cases	1% of cases	K Solutions v NUS: Striking Out for Document Destruction & Discovery Obligations(Jun 2009)
Drew and Napier	1 cases	1% of cases	Bassatne v El Gohary: Enforceability of MOU in Oil Trading Joint Venture(Mar 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cavinder Bull's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.2
Complex Cases: 29 (35%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	16.0 parties avg	6.0	1%
Lost	223.4 parties avg	3.4	26%
Neutral	54.5 parties avg	4.5	6%
Partial	105.5 parties avg	5.5	12%
Unknown	16.0 parties avg	6.0	1%
Won	473.9 parties avg	3.9	56%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	43.3 parties avg	3.3
2003	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	25.4 parties avg	5.4
2005	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2006	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2007	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2008	45.3 parties avg	5.3
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	63.4 parties avg	3.4
2011	64.9 parties avg	4.9
2012	83.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	43.5 parties avg	3.5
2014	33.5 parties avg	3.5
2015	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2017	36.4 parties avg	6.4
2018	24.7 parties avg	4.7
2019	33.4 parties avg	3.4
2020	84.4 parties avg	4.4
2021	43.4 parties avg	3.4
2022	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2023	45.3 parties avg	5.3
2024	34.9 parties avg	4.9

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cavinder Bull's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(1%)	1%
Lost	22(26%)	26%
Neutral	5(6%)	6%
Partial	10(12%)	12%
Unknown	1(1%)	1%
Won	47(55%)	55%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
CHF	9,500,000.00	9,500,000.001 cases	1
NZD	2,677,303.00	2,677,303.001 cases	1
SGD	6,392,330.39	145,280.2444 cases	44
USD	7,429,484,660.02	1,485,896,932.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2003	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	3 111	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2005	2 11	Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	6 24	Lost: 2 cases (33.3%) Won: 4 cases (66.7%)
2011	6 114	Lost: 1 cases (16.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 4 cases (66.7%)
2012	8 116	Neutral: 1 cases (12.5%) Partial: 1 cases (12.5%) Won: 6 cases (75.0%)
2013	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2014	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2015	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%)
2020	8 17	Lost: 1 cases (12.5%) Won: 7 cases (87.5%)
2021	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2022	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2023	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2024	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 84 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Reliance Infrastructure v. Shanghai Electric: Arbitration Award Challenge Based on Alleged Forgery 16 Dec 2024 Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd (Respondent)Won	16 Dec 2024	Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Appellant must pay the Respondent costs of USD 160,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Credit Suisse Trust Ltd v Ivanishvili: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation 04 Jul 2024 Bidzina Ivanishvili (Respondent)Partial	04 Jul 2024	Bidzina Ivanishvili (Respondent): Appeal Partially DismissedThe respondents were successful in defending the appeal on the key points, with the court upholding the finding of breach of fiduciary duty and the use of the Whole Portfolio Model for quantification. The compensation award of US$742.73m was adjusted, but the respondents remained the more successful party. Assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts and the underlying transactions were denominated in US dollars.
3	Reliance Infrastructure v Shanghai Electric: SICC Rules on Costs Assessment 15 Apr 2024 Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd (Defendant)Won	15 Apr 2024	Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd (Defendant): Costs AwardedShanghai Electric was awarded costs in the amount of US$734,660.02, a reduction from the costs claimed by them of US$911,244.87.
4	Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Stay of Execution Pending Appeal in Trust Dispute 01 Nov 2023 Bera Ivanishvili (Plaintiff)Partial	01 Nov 2023	Bera Ivanishvili (Plaintiff): Stay of execution granted on conditionStay of execution granted on the condition that the defendant pays into Court the full amount of the judgment sums plus post-judgment interest.
5	Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Breach of Trust, Quantification of Losses & Costs 18 Sep 2023 Bera Ivanishvili (Plaintiff)Won	18 Sep 2023	Bera Ivanishvili (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe defendant shall pay to a Trust Fund, the trustee of such fund being identified by the plaintiffs to be the 2nd plaintiff, the sum of US$742.73m, being the plaintiffs’ losses calculated in accordance with Model 1B from 30 March 2008 to 26 May 2023 and taking into account the Settlement dated 1 December 2022.
6	Republic of India v. Deutsche Telekom AG: Arbitration Confidentiality & Privacy 08 Jun 2023 The Republic of India (Applicant)Lost	08 Jun 2023	The Republic of India (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for the Appeal and any other applications that may be filed in connection with it to be heard in private was dismissed.
7	Deutsche Telekom AG v. Republic of India: BIT, Arbitration, State Immunity, Enforcement of Award 29 Jan 2023 The Republic of India (Defendant)Lost	29 Jan 2023	The Republic of India (Defendant): Applications dismissedSUM 155, SUM 24, SUM 45 and SUM 720 are dismissed. India bears DT’s costs of SUM 155, SUM 24 and SUM 45. There will be no order as to the costs of SUM 720. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Bharat Forge v Bombardier: Breach of Contract & Negligence in Aircraft Maintenance 28 Jul 2022 Bombardier Aerospace Services Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 Jul 2022	Bombardier Aerospace Services Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claims dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
9	CSY v CSZ: Stay of Court Proceedings & Court's Discretion Under Arbitration Act 18 May 2022 CSY (Appellant)Won	18 May 2022	CSY (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the decision of the High Court to stay the FY2018 and FY2019 Dispute in favour of arbitration was overturned.
10	Lao Holdings NV v Government of the Lao PDR: Setting Aside ICSID & PCA Awards for Bribery & Corruption Allegations 12 Apr 2022 The Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Defendant)Won	12 Apr 2022	The Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Defendant): Applications dismissedThe applications to set aside the BIT Awards were dismissed, and the Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic was awarded costs of SGD 214,000 (this amount is net of the costs awarded to Lao Holdings NV for the Sealing Applications). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	CMJ v CML: Setting Aside SIAC Arbitration Award for Alleged Breach of Natural Justice 29 Dec 2021 CMM (Defendant)Won	29 Dec 2021	CMM (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantOriginating Summons dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	CAJ v CAI: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Excess of Jurisdiction 10 Nov 2021 CAI (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	10 Nov 2021	CAI (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldThe Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the portion of the arbitral award relating to the extension of time.
13	Tan Ng Kuang v Jai Swarup Pathak: Disciplinary Proceedings for Regulated Foreign Lawyer 13 Oct 2021 Jai Swarup Pathak (Respondent)Won	13 Oct 2021	Jai Swarup Pathak (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication for disciplinary action against the respondent was dismissed.
14	CAI v CAJ: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Excess of Jurisdiction in Construction Dispute 28 Jan 2021 CAI (Plaintiff)Partial	28 Jan 2021	CAI (Plaintiff): Application allowed in partApplication to set aside the Tribunal’s decision to grant the defendants an extension of time of 25 days for the delay in Mechanical Completion was allowed.
15	Republic of India v Vedanta Resources: Confidentiality in Investment Treaty Arbitration 07 Oct 2020 Republic of India (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Oct 2020	Republic of India (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe plaintiff's application for declaratory relief was dismissed. Costs of $50,000 plus disbursements were awarded to the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Sandy Island Pte Ltd v Thio Keng Thay: Damages for Defects in Construction Contract 27 Aug 2020 Thio Keng Thay (Respondent)Won	27 Aug 2020	Thio Keng Thay (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; awarded costs for the appeal fixed at $50,000 (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Amendment of Pleadings and Forum Non Conveniens in Trust Dispute 02 Jul 2020 Bera Ivanishvili (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	02 Jul 2020	Bera Ivanishvili (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, setting aside the order staying Suit 790.
18	Chan Pik Sun v Wan Hoe Keet: Mareva Injunction in Investment Scheme Dispute 02 Jul 2020 Ho Sally (Defendant)Won	02 Jul 2020	Ho Sally (Defendant): Application DismissedThe application for a Mareva injunction against the defendant was dismissed.
19	Mulacek v Civelli: Appeal on Forum Non Conveniens and Anti-Suit Injunction in Breach of Contract and Fiduciary Duty Claims 14 Jun 2020 Aster Capital SA (Ltd) Panama (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	14 Jun 2020	Aster Capital SA (Ltd) Panama (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs and disbursements fixed at a global figure of $45,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	Bloomberry v Global Gaming: Setting Aside & Enforcement of Singapore Arbitration Award on Wrongful Termination 28 May 2020 GGAM Netherlands B.V. (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	28 May 2020	GGAM Netherlands B.V. (Defendant, Plaintiff): Applications dismissedBloomberry's application to set aside the Final Award and resist enforcement of the Final Award were dismissed.
21	Baker v BCS: Oral Trust, Fiduciary Duty & Loan Dispute over Ethocyn Rights 28 Apr 2020 Baker, Michael A (executor of the estate of Chantal Burnison, deceased) (Plaintiff)Won	28 Apr 2020	Baker, Michael A (executor of the estate of Chantal Burnison, deceased) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment in favour of Baker, on behalf of the Estate, against Weber in the sum of CHF9.5 million plus interest at the rate of 3% per annum to the plaintiff, calculated from the date of the loan to the date of judgment; thereafter, for the avoidance of doubt, interest at 5.33% per annum shall run pursuant to para 77 of the Supreme Court Practice Directions.
22	Bloomberry v Global Gaming: Wrongful Termination & Fraud in Singapore Arbitration Enforcement 02 Jan 2020 Global Gaming Philippines LLC (Defendant)Won	02 Jan 2020	Global Gaming Philippines LLC (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantApplication to resist enforcement of the Partial Award is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Civelli v. Mulacek: Forum Non Conveniens & Anti-Suit Injunction in Loan Dispute 13 Aug 2019 Aster Capital SA (Ltd) Panama (Plaintiff)Neutral	13 Aug 2019	Aster Capital SA (Ltd) Panama (Plaintiff): NeutralOutcome for Aster Capital S.A. (LTD) Panama is tied to the outcome for Carlo Giuseppe Civelli, as they are co-plaintiffs in Suit 1159/2017. The court's decision impacts both parties equally.
24	Thio Syn Pyn v Thio Syn Kym Wendy: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 26 Mar 2019 Thio Syn Pyn (Appellant)Lost	26 Mar 2019	Thio Syn Pyn (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $28,000 (all-in) were to be paid by the Appellant to the Respondents. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
25	PP v Leow Ban Leong: Falsification of Accounts Appeal 11 Feb 2019 Foo Fang Liong (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	11 Feb 2019	Foo Fang Liong (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissedAppeal against conviction dismissed.
26	Thio Syn Kym Wendy v Thio Syn Pyn: Minority Oppression in Family-Owned Companies 07 Aug 2018 Thio Syn Pyn (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	07 Aug 2018	Thio Syn Pyn (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part; required to buy out the plaintiffs’ shares in both MDI and THPL. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	Ng Siok Poh v Sim Lian-Koru Bena JV Pte Ltd: Damages for Nuisance & Negligence from Construction 02 Jul 2018 NG SIOK POH (SUING IN HER CAPACITY AS THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF LIM LIAN CHIAT, DECEASED) (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	02 Jul 2018	NG SIOK POH (SUING IN HER CAPACITY AS THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF LIM LIAN CHIAT, DECEASED) (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, awarding $50,000 for loss of amenity and $18,620 for the cost of replacing doors. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28	Asia-American Investments Group Inc v UBS AG: Breach of Contract & Warranty of Authority 14 Jun 2017 UBS AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant)Won	14 Jun 2017	UBS AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant.
29	Rotary Engineering v Kioumji & Eslim: Forum Non Conveniens and Stay of Proceedings 20 Mar 2017 Chia Kim Hung (Appellant, Respondent)Won	20 Mar 2017	Chia Kim Hung (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs of $30,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be paid to the defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
30	Compania De Navegacion Palomar v Perez De La Sala: Breach of Trust & Fiduciary Duties 26 Jan 2017 JAMES MORGAN COPINGER-SYMES (Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	26 Jan 2017	JAMES MORGAN COPINGER-SYMES (Defendant in Counterclaim): Counterclaim for Misrepresentation AllowedCounterclaim for Misrepresentation Allowed; the judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD for Singapore.
31	Sanum Investments v. Government of Lao: Treaty Interpretation & Arbitration Jurisdiction 28 Sep 2016 The Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Respondent, Applicant, Plaintiff)Lost	28 Sep 2016	The Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Respondent, Applicant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; costs awarded to Sanum (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
32	Nava Bharat v Straits Law: Professional Negligence & Breach of Contract in Coal Mine Acquisition 25 Feb 2016 M Rajaram (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	25 Feb 2016	M Rajaram (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in partThe defendants’ appeal in CA 133/2015 was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
33	PT Perusahaan Gas Negara v CRW: Interim Award Enforcement & Arbitrability 26 May 2015 CRW Joint Operation (Respondent)Won	26 May 2015	CRW Joint Operation (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld with costs to be taxed if not agreed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
34	Laos v Sanum: Applicability of PRC-Laos BIT to Macau & Investment Treaty Arbitration 19 Jan 2015 Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Plaintiff)Won	19 Jan 2015	Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Plaintiff): Application AllowedPlaintiff's application was allowed with costs to be agreed or taxed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
35	Tey Tsun Hang v National University of Singapore: Judicial Review of Dismissal 13 Jan 2015 National University of Singapore (Respondent)Won	13 Jan 2015	National University of Singapore (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication for leave to bring judicial review proceedings dismissed.
36	Guy Neale v Nine Squares: Trust, Trade Marks & Ku De Ta Brand Dispute 21 Dec 2014 Nine Squares Pty Ltd (Respondent)Lost	21 Dec 2014	Nine Squares Pty Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Singapore Marks held on trust for the Partnership.
37	PT Perusahaan Gas Negara v CRW Joint Operation: Setting Aside Arbitral Award 15 Jul 2014 CRW Joint Operation (Indonesia) (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	15 Jul 2014	CRW Joint Operation (Indonesia) (Plaintiff, Respondent): Applications DismissedApplications to set aside arbitral award and order permitting enforcement were dismissed with costs of $20,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
38	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Dispute over SinCo Technologies Dividends and Share Transfer 15 Apr 2014 Lim Jit Ming Bryan's Wife (Defendant)Won	15 Apr 2014	Lim Jit Ming Bryan's Wife (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
39	Neale v Nine Squares: Trust, Trade Marks & Partnership Dispute over 'KU DE TA' Brand 17 Nov 2013 Nine Squares Pty Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Nov 2013	Nine Squares Pty Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; no monetary award. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
40	MAS v Huang Zhong Xuan: Injunction for Securities Act Breach & Beneficial Ownership Dispute 11 Nov 2013 Monetary Authority of Singapore (Plaintiff)Won	11 Nov 2013	Monetary Authority of Singapore (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffPermanent injunction granted against the defendants.
41	OpenNet v. Info-Communications: Appeal for Judicial Review Dismissal 13 Mar 2013 Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore (Respondent)Lost	13 Mar 2013	Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication to strike out the notice of appeal dismissed.
42	Chng Bee Kheng v Chng Eng Chye: Trust Deed Validity & Beneficial Ownership Dispute 25 Feb 2013 Chng Eng Chye (Defendant)Lost	25 Feb 2013	Chng Eng Chye (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's arguments dismissed; costs to be paid to the plaintiffs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
43	Re Andrews Geraldine Mary QC: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel in Singapore 14 Nov 2012 Teo Soo Geok Josephine (Defendant)Neutral	14 Nov 2012	Teo Soo Geok Josephine (Defendant): Application OpposedDefendant opposed the application for ad hoc admission.
44	HSBC v Toshin: Good Faith, Rent Review, and Valuer Independence 26 Aug 2012 Toshin Development Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	26 Aug 2012	Toshin Development Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; each party to bear its own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
45	OpenNet v IDA: Judicial Review of IDA's Decision on NetLink Trust's Compliance with Control and Ownership Requirements 23 Aug 2012 Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore (Respondent)Won	23 Aug 2012	Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
46	Quarella SpA v Scelta Marble: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards for Wrong Choice of Law 13 Aug 2012 Scelta Marble Australia Pty Ltd (Defendant)Won	13 Aug 2012	Scelta Marble Australia Pty Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe application to set aside the arbitration awards was dismissed, upholding the awards in favor of the defendant.
47	Goh Sin Huat v Ho See Jui: Negligence, Private Nuisance, Water Leakage & Damage to Art 25 Jun 2012 Goh Sin Huat Electrical Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	25 Jun 2012	Goh Sin Huat Electrical Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe appeal was partially allowed with respect to the order of indemnity granted by the Judge. The apportionment of liability reverted to 70% to the appellant and 30% to Liquid Advertising.
48	Sim Hok Khun v Henry Budi Harsono: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of Trust over Jardine Matheson Shares 10 Apr 2012 Henry Budi Harsono @ Sim Hok Kiong (Defendant)Won	10 Apr 2012	Henry Budi Harsono @ Sim Hok Kiong (Defendant): Stay of Proceedings GrantedDefendant's application for a stay of proceedings on the ground of forum non conveniens was granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
49	Lew Chee Fai Kevin v MAS: Insider Trading, Securities and Futures Act - Appeal on Liability 09 Feb 2012 Monetary Authority of Singapore (Respondent)Won	09 Feb 2012	Monetary Authority of Singapore (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
50	HSBC v Toshin: Rent Review Mechanism Dispute in Ngee Ann City Lease 12 Jan 2012 Toshin Development Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	12 Jan 2012	Toshin Development Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application was dismissed with costs to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
51	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Amendment of Statement of Claim & Alternative Pleading 17 Nov 2011 Lim Jit Ming Bryan (Respondent)Lost	17 Nov 2011	Lim Jit Ming Bryan (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the respondent to pay half of the appellant's costs of the present appeal. There will be no order as to costs with regard to the proceedings before the Judge and the AR. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
52	Stansfield Group v Consumers’ Association: Tort, Contract & Suspension of CaseTrust Membership 17 May 2011 Consumers Association of Singapore (Defendant)Won	17 May 2011	Consumers Association of Singapore (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for Defendant with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
53	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Amendment of Statement of Claim & Settlement Agreement Dispute 15 May 2011 Lim Jit Ming Bryan (Defendant, Respondent)Won	15 May 2011	Lim Jit Ming Bryan (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe defendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's appeal.
54	Loh Kwok Kee v Foo Hee Toon Gilbert: Minority Shareholder Oppression under Companies Act 08 May 2011 Chua (Defendant)Won	08 May 2011	Chua (Defendant): Claim dismissedThe claim against the defendant was dismissed.
55	Rankine v Chenet: Share Transfer Dispute & Summary Judgment Appeal 30 Mar 2011 Rankine Bernadette Adeline (Plaintiff, Appellant)Neutral	30 Mar 2011	Rankine Bernadette Adeline (Plaintiff, Appellant): Conditional leave to defend granted to DefendantThe Plaintiff's appeal was partially successful in that the Defendant was granted conditional leave to defend.
56	Jurong Data Centre v M+W Singapore: Validity of Security Documents & Charges 15 Mar 2011 Receivers (Defendant)Won	15 Mar 2011	Receivers (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
57	JIO Minerals FZC v Mineral Enterprises Ltd: Forum Non Conveniens & Misrepresentation 10 Nov 2010 Raman Srinivasan (Appellant, Defendant)Won	10 Nov 2010	Raman Srinivasan (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs.
58	Dr Eric Gan v SMC: Negligence in Post-operative Care After ERCP Procedure 31 Oct 2010 Dr Eric Gan Keng Seng (Appellant)Lost	31 Oct 2010	Dr Eric Gan Keng Seng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of the Disciplinary Committee dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
59	Monetary Authority of Singapore v Tan Chong Koay: Market Rigging & False Trading in UET Shares 16 Sep 2010 Monetary Authority of Singapore (Plaintiff)Won	16 Sep 2010	Monetary Authority of Singapore (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; civil penalties of $250,000 each were imposed on the defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
60	MAS v Lew Chee Fai Kevin: Insider Trading, Securities and Futures Act, Material Non-Public Information 26 May 2010 Monetary Authority of Singapore (Plaintiff)Won	26 May 2010	Monetary Authority of Singapore (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court found that MAS has satisfied, on a balance of probabilities, the requisite elements to make out the claim for insider trading under s 218 of the SFA against Lew. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming the currency of the jurisdiction (SGD for Singapore).
61	Mineral Enterprises Ltd v JIO Minerals FZC: Forum Non Conveniens & Contract Dispute 12 Apr 2010 Third defendant (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	12 Apr 2010	Third defendant (Defendant, Respondent): Stay of Action Upheld by Assistant Registrar ReversedThe Assistant Registrar's decision to stay the plaintiff's action was reversed on appeal.
62	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Striking Out 'Without Prejudice' Communications in Trust Dispute 28 Jan 2010 Josephine Teo Soo Geok (Defendant)Won	28 Jan 2010	Josephine Teo Soo Geok (Defendant): Application grantedApplication to strike out paragraphs in the Statement of Claim and affidavit was granted.
63	K Solutions v NUS: Striking Out for Document Destruction & Discovery Obligations 15 Jun 2009 National University of Singapore (Defendant, Respondent)Won	15 Jun 2009	National University of Singapore (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for NUS on its counterclaim for damages to be assessed and specific sums (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
64	ING Belgium NV v Projector SA: Winding Up of Foreign Company in Singapore 11 Dec 2008 Samsung Total Petrochemical Co Ltd (Respondent)Lost	11 Dec 2008	Samsung Total Petrochemical Co Ltd (Respondent): Opposition unsuccessfulOpposition to the winding up application was unsuccessful.
65	Wong Kian Kok v Landmark Chemicals: Enforceability of Settlement Agreement Dispute 01 Sep 2008 Wong Kian Kok and Another (liquidators of Asichem Trading (S) Pte Ltd (in liquidation)) (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	01 Sep 2008	Wong Kian Kok and Another (liquidators of Asichem Trading (S) Pte Ltd (in liquidation)) (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; payment into court ordered. The plaintiffs sought to recover US$1.45 million under the agreement.
66	Alliance Management SA v Pendleton Lane P: Striking Out Defence for Non-Compliance with Discovery Orders 02 Jun 2008 Alliance Management SA (Plaintiff)Won	02 Jun 2008	Alliance Management SA (Plaintiff): Interlocutory judgment for the plaintiffInterlocutory judgment entered for the plaintiff with damages to be assessed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
67	Chang Ham Chwee v Chan Siew Khim: Trust, Succession, and Lighterage Business Dispute 08 Jan 2008 Chang Ham Chwee (Plaintiff)Lost	08 Jan 2008	Chang Ham Chwee (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim that the properties were purchased with his money and held in trust for him was dismissed.
68	Alliance Management SA v Pendleton Lane P: Discovery, Production of Documents & Inspection 21 Aug 2007 Alliance Management SA (Plaintiff)Partial	21 Aug 2007	Alliance Management SA (Plaintiff): Appeal Dismissed for the most partAppeal dismissed for the most part and costs fixed at $10,000 with disbursements to be taxed, if parties were unable to agree on the quantum of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
69	Townsing v Jenton: Director's Fiduciary Duty & Company's Reflective Loss 11 Mar 2007 Townsing Henry George (Appellant)Lost	11 Mar 2007	Townsing Henry George (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
70	Rickshaw Investments v Nicolai Von Uexkull: Forum Non Conveniens & Jurisdiction in Contractual Disputes 26 Apr 2006 Seabed Exlorations GBR (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Apr 2006	Seabed Exlorations GBR (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the stay of the Singapore action was dismissed.
71	Jenton Overseas Investment v Townsing: Director's Duties & Undue Preference 23 Feb 2006 Townsing Henry George (Defendant)Lost	23 Feb 2006	Townsing Henry George (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant for NZD 2,677,303 with interest at 6% per annum from 2004-06-04. The currency is New Zealand Dollar (NZD) as the claim is for funds transferred from a New Zealand bank account.
72	Kaufman v Datacraft: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Agreement Interpretation 21 Sep 2005 Datacraft Asia Investments BV (Defendant)Won	21 Sep 2005	Datacraft Asia Investments BV (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for Defendant; plaintiffs' suit dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
73	Re Bintan Lagoon Resort Ltd: Judicial Management Order Application 18 Aug 2005 Receiver and manager (Respondent)	18 Aug 2005	Receiver and manager (Respondent): -
74	Vita Health v Pang: Director's Duties, Fictitious Sales, Breach of Contract & Misrepresentation 28 Jul 2004 Vita Life Sciences Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	28 Jul 2004	Vita Life Sciences Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $2,368,821.99 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
75	Bassatne v El Gohary: Enforceability of MOU in Oil Trading Joint Venture 28 Mar 2004 Walid Bassatne (Plaintiff)Partial	28 Mar 2004	Walid Bassatne (Plaintiff): Interlocutory judgment for PlaintiffInterlocutory judgment with costs for the plaintiffs against the first and second defendants. The Registrar is directed to assess the quantum of the losses of BBEA and thereby the total 35% liability of the first and second defendants. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
76	Pacific Rim Palm Oil v PT Asiatic Persada: Breach of Loan Agreement & Quistclose Trust 16 Oct 2003 PT Asiatic Persada (Defendant)Dismissed	16 Oct 2003	PT Asiatic Persada (Defendant): Claim DismissedNo order was made against the 1st Defendant as the funds were not dissipated and were available to satisfy any judgment against the 2nd to 5th Defendants.
77	Ong Yew Kew v Attorney-General: Adverse Possession & Strata Title Dispute 26 Jan 2003 Ong Yew Kew (Applicant)Lost	26 Jan 2003	Ong Yew Kew (Applicant): Originating Summons dismissedThe Applicant's claim for adverse possession was dismissed.
78	SingTel v IDA: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Restitution Claim for Mistake of Law 07 Jul 2002 Info-communications Development Authority (Plaintiff)Neutral	07 Jul 2002	Info-communications Development Authority (Plaintiff): NeutralThe outcome for IDA in the underlying suit is pending.
79	IDA v SingTel: Restitution for Mistake of Law in Telecom License Modification Compensation 29 May 2002 Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore (Plaintiff)Lost	29 May 2002	Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for restitution of $388 million was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
80	Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore v Singapore Telecommunications Ltd: Discovery & Waiver of Privilege 01 May 2002 Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	01 May 2002	Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedPlaintiff's appeal was dismissed.
81	Agus Irawan v Toh Tech Chye: Derivative Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 14 Mar 2002 Citra Flour Mill (Defendant)Won	14 Mar 2002	Citra Flour Mill (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication against the defendant was dismissed.
82	Ong Yew Kew v Re Lot 114-69 Mukim 22: Adverse Possession Against Charitable Trust & Land Title Dispute 23 Apr 2001 Ong Yew Kew (Applicant)Won	23 Apr 2001	Ong Yew Kew (Applicant): Application AllowedThe applicant's claim for adverse possession was successful.
83	Kamla Lal Hiranand v Harilela Padma Hari: Validity of 1988 Will & Secret Trusts 07 Aug 2000 Others (Respondent)Won	07 Aug 2000	Others (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
84	CIC Video v Forward International: Garnishee Order Appeal on Debt Repayment Discretion 26 Jan 2000 Wo Kee Hong (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Garnishee, Appellant)Lost	26 Jan 2000	Wo Kee Hong (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Garnishee, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs; garnishee order absolute granted against the garnishee in the sum of $1,816,191 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).