PP v Wang Minjiang: Appeal Against Sentence for Aiding Procurement of Sexual Services of a Minor

In Public Prosecutor v Wang Minjiang, the Public Prosecutor appealed to the High Court of Singapore against the sentence imposed on Wang Minjiang for abetting the procurement of sexual services of a 17-year-old female. Wang Minjiang had been fined $8,000 for the offense. The High Court, presided over by Choo Han Teck J, allowed the appeal and increased the sentence to 12 months imprisonment, effective from 8 August 2008.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal allowed; sentence increased to 12 months imprisonment.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment reserved

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The Public Prosecutor appealed against the sentence for Wang Minjiang, who aided in procuring sexual services of a 17-year-old. The High Court increased the sentence to 12 months imprisonment.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorAppellantGovernment AgencyAppeal allowedWon
Mark Tay of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Wang MinjiangRespondentIndividualSentence increasedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Mark TayAttorney-General’s Chambers

4. Facts

  1. Wang Minjiang pleaded guilty to charges under the Women’s Charter.
  2. Wang Minjiang brought a 17-year-old female into Singapore for prostitution.
  3. Wang Minjiang was initially fined $8,000 for aiding in the procurement of sexual services.
  4. Wang Minjiang did not pay the fines and was serving imprisonment in default.
  5. Wang Minjiang abetted Tan Chye Hin to obtain sexual services of a 17-year-old for S$100.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Wang Minjiang, MA 227/2008, [2008] SGHC 209

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Wang Minjiang abetted Tan Chye Hin in obtaining sexual services of a 17-year-old female.
Wang Minjiang remanded.
Wang Minjiang pleaded guilty to four charges under the Women’s Charter.
Judgment reserved.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Appropriateness of sentence for aiding the procurement of sexual services of a minor
    • Outcome: The High Court found the original fine inadequate and increased the sentence to 12 months imprisonment.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Increased sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Aiding the procurement of sexual services of a minor

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Section 376B(1) of the Penal CodeSingapore
Section 109 of the Penal Code, Chapter 224 (2004 Rev. Ed.)Singapore
Women’s Charter (Cap 353, 1997 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Procurement of sexual services
  • Minor
  • Sentencing
  • Women's Charter
  • Abetment

15.2 Keywords

  • Public Prosecutor
  • Wang Minjiang
  • Section 376B(1)
  • Penal Code
  • Women’s Charter
  • Singapore
  • High Court
  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing
  • Prostitution

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Procedure
  • Sentencing