Mark Tay

Mark Tay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 20 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mark Tay has demonstrated expertise across 166 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and sentencing.

Practice AreaCase Volume
Criminal Law20 cases
Sentencing16 cases
Criminal Procedure13 cases
Misuse of Drugs Act12 cases
Evidence8 cases
Statutory Interpretation4 cases
Penal Code4 cases
Mischief2 cases
Prostitution Law2 cases
Appeal2 cases
Torts2 cases
Criminal Revision2 cases
Sexual Offences2 cases
Community-based sentencing options2 cases
Robbery1 cases
Adducing fresh evidence1 cases
Trafficking1 cases
Women’s Charter1 cases
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice1 cases
Public Prosecutor1 cases
Consent of Public Prosecutor1 cases
Law of Pleadings1 cases
Statutory offence1 cases
Clang of the prison gates principle1 cases
Sexual assault by penetration1 cases
Prosecutorial Misconduct1 cases
Prima Facie Case1 cases
Reasonable Suspicion1 cases
Search and Seizure1 cases
Privilege1 cases
Legal Professional Privilege1 cases
Documents1 cases
Amendment of Charges1 cases
Prosecution by Attrition1 cases
Constitutionality1 cases
Identification Evidence1 cases
Witness gating1 cases
Eyewitness testimony1 cases
Elements of crime1 cases
Retraction of Plea1 cases
Mitigation Plea1 cases
Reopening of concluded criminal appeal1 cases
Standard of Proof for Fraud1 cases
Legitimate expectations1 cases
Attempted Murder1 cases
Affray1 cases
Pathology1 cases
Voluntary Intoxication1 cases
Corruption1 cases
Ill-treatment of child or young person1 cases
Controlled Drugs1 cases
Confession and avoidance defence1 cases
Drug Possession1 cases
Forfeiture Order1 cases
Drug Importation1 cases
Wrongful Retention1 cases
Disqualification1 cases
Drunk driving1 cases
National Service Offences1 cases
Actus Reus1 cases
Voluntariness of Statements1 cases
Paediatrics1 cases
Psychiatric Evidence1 cases
Illegal importation of controlled drugs1 cases
Private Defence1 cases
Principles on forfeiture1 cases
Show cause hearing1 cases
Kidnapping1 cases
Misconduct1 cases
Electricity Act1 cases
Mental Disability1 cases
Double Identity1 cases
Sexual Penetration of Minor1 cases
Criminal References1 cases
Drug Offences1 cases
Illegally importing controlled drugs1 cases
Sexual Grooming1 cases
Instant messaging1 cases
Recantation evidence1 cases
Abnormality of Mind1 cases
Drug Consumption1 cases
Suffocation1 cases
Drug Overdose1 cases
Road Safety1 cases
Dishonest Intention1 cases
Wrongful Loss1 cases
Wrongful Gain1 cases
Benchmark Sentences1 cases
Judicial Mercy1 cases
Polygamous Marriage1 cases
School Bullying1 cases
Cyberbullying1 cases
Match-fixing1 cases
Tax Evasion1 cases
Building Regulations1 cases
Rash Act1 cases
Primary School Admission1 cases
Sentencing Precedents1 cases
Traffic Lights1 cases
Inconsiderate Driving1 cases
Betting Act1 cases
Prosecution’s duty to assist the court in respect of sentencing1 cases
Dishonestly receiving stolen property1 cases
Personal Cost Order1 cases
Romantic Relationship1 cases
Illegitimate Children1 cases
Nullity Suit1 cases
False Information1 cases
Risk Assessment1 cases
Enhanced Punishments1 cases
Share Ownership1 cases
Open justice1 cases
Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act1 cases
Review of Detention1 cases
Arsenic Poisoning1 cases
Flight Risk1 cases
Malicious Prosecution of Civil Proceedings1 cases
Chinese Customary Law1 cases
Witness Tampering1 cases
Attempt to Pervert the Course of Justice1 cases
Human Rights1 cases
Extortion1 cases
Rash Driving1 cases
Dissolution of Marriage1 cases
Exceptional Hardship1 cases
Exceptional Depravity1 cases
Personal Protection Order1 cases
Major Depressive Disorder1 cases
Commercial Sex1 cases
Re-sentencing1 cases
Judicial Immunity1 cases
Traffic Death Cases1 cases
Negligent Driving1 cases
Probation1 cases
Motor Traffic Accident1 cases
Bereavement1 cases
Funeral Expenses1 cases
Drug-related Sexual Assault1 cases
Legal Representation1 cases
Learning Disorder1 cases
Dishonest receipt of stolen property1 cases
Road Traffic Offences1 cases
Road Accident1 cases
Impersonating a police officer1 cases
Driving without a valid license1 cases
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder1 cases
Drink-driving Offence1 cases
Directional Offence1 cases
Drug Abuse1 cases
One transaction rule1 cases
Totality principle1 cases
Confessions1 cases
Proportionality principle1 cases
Dispute Resolution1 cases
Personal Injury1 cases
Theft1 cases
Wrongful Death1 cases
Evidence Law1 cases
Admissibility of evidence1 cases
Road Traffic Act1 cases
Culpable Homicide1 cases
Murder1 cases
Offences1 cases
Drug Trafficking1 cases
Mitigation1 cases
Principle of Parity1 cases

Law Firm Affiliations

Mark Tay has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 15 cases.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mark Tay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
2.2
Complex Cases
0 (0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost32.0 parties avg
Neutral23.0 parties avg
Partial22.0 parties avg
Remanded13.0 parties avg
Won122.1 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
200612.0 parties avg
200812.0 parties avg
200942.3 parties avg
201112.0 parties avg
201312.0 parties avg
201412.0 parties avg
201712.0 parties avg
201842.5 parties avg
201912.0 parties avg
202022.0 parties avg
202122.5 parties avg
202212.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mark Tay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost3(15%)
Neutral2(10%)
Partial2(10%)
Remanded1(5%)
Won12(60%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD0.001 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20061
1
20081
1
20094
112
20111
1
20131
1
20141
1
20171
1
20184
1111
20191
1
20202
2
20212
2
20221
1

Case History

Displaying all 20 cases

Case
08 Mar 2022
Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won
12 Sep 2021
Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won
24 Feb 2021
Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won
29 Oct 2020
Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff)Won
18 Feb 2020
Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won
16 Apr 2019
Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won
02 Oct 2018
Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Remanded
28 Jun 2018
Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Partial
23 Apr 2018
Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Neutral
11 Feb 2018
Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost
07 Dec 2017
Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost
12 Mar 2014
Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Won
09 Jul 2013
Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won
10 Apr 2011
Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won
24 Nov 2009
Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won
05 May 2009
Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost
06 Apr 2009
Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Neutral
23 Mar 2009
Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won
13 Nov 2008
Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won
27 Mar 2006
Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial