MB v MC: Appeal for Variation of Maintenance Dismissed

In MB v MC, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal by MC ("the Wife") against the decision of the District Judge to dismiss her application for a variation of maintenance previously awarded to her and her son by MB ("the Husband"). The Wife sought a lump sum maintenance of $250,000 for herself and her child, citing the Husband's age and sale of property. The court dismissed the appeal, finding that the Wife's application was primarily motivated by a desire to obtain a share of the Husband's assets rather than genuine need.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Family

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal for variation of maintenance for wife and child dismissed. The court found the application was motivated by the husband's assets.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
MBRespondentIndividualAppeal DismissedWon
MCApplicantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Woo Bih LiJYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Andrew TanAndrew Tan Tiong Gee & Co

4. Facts

  1. The Wife applied for a variation of maintenance previously awarded to her and her son.
  2. The Wife sought a lump sum maintenance of $250,000 for herself and her child.
  3. The Wife cited the Husband's age and sale of property as reasons for the variation.
  4. The Husband was 78 years old in 2008 and received $1,900 as monthly pension.
  5. The Husband sold his property at Jalan Unggas on 14 February 2005 for $2.7 million.
  6. The Wife had been diagnosed with nasopharyngeal cancer more than 16 years ago.
  7. The child suffers from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Autistic Spectrum Disorder and was enrolled at XYZ School.

5. Formal Citations

  1. MB v MC, D 601589/2001, RAS 720017/2008, [2008] SGHC 246

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Date of registration of marriage
Decree nisi granted
Maintenance for the child effective from this date
Husband sold his property at Jalan Unggas
District Judge Laura Lau made orders on the ancillaries
Appeal dismissed by Justice Tan Lee Meng
Application dismissed by District Judge Khoo Oon Soo
Wife filed an appeal against DJ Khoo’s decision
Justice Tay Yong Kwang dismissed this appeal
Child enrolled at XYZ School
Wife filed the 2008 Summons
Husband filed reply affidavit
Wife filed second affidavit
Application dismissed by District Judge Regina Ow-Chang Yee Lin
Appeal heard and dismissed
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Variation of Maintenance
    • Outcome: The court dismissed the Wife's appeal for a variation of maintenance, finding that her application was motivated by a desire to obtain a share of the Husband's assets.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Lump Sum Maintenance
  2. Variation of Maintenance

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Child Support

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Maintenance
  • Lump Sum
  • Variation
  • Ancillary Matters
  • ADHD
  • ASD

15.2 Keywords

  • family law
  • maintenance
  • divorce
  • child support
  • appeal
  • variation

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Child Maintenance