Andrew Tan

Andrew Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 15 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 73.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Andrew Tan has demonstrated expertise across 52 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	9 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
House-breaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investment Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Health Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest Rates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prostitution Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug-related Sexual Assault	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
General Deterrence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inheritance (Family Provision) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Andrew Tan has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	9 cases	60% of cases	PP v Parthiban Kanapathy: Drug Importation, Chain of Custody, Statement Accuracy(Sep 2019) Public Prosecutor v Shah Putra bin Samsuddin: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2018) PP v Paner Selvom: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Mar 2018)
Andrew Tan Tiong Gee & Co	4 cases	27% of cases	Quek Tiong Kheng v Chang Choong Khoon: Appeal on Investment Losses and Claims of Fraud and Misrepresentation(Feb 2013) APZ v AQA: Inheritance Claim for Autistic Son's Maintenance(Apr 2011) MB v MC: Appeal for Variation of Maintenance Dismissed(Dec 2008)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	7% of cases	Yip Kin Lung v Ding Auto: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Beneficial Ownership Dispute(Apr 2020)
Lee & Lee	1 cases	7% of cases	MWA Capital Pte Ltd v Ivy Lee Realty Pte Ltd: Winding Up, Interest Rates & Moneylenders Act(Aug 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Andrew Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 3 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.0 parties avg	4.0	27%
Won	112.6 parties avg	2.6	73%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2018	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Andrew Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(27%)	27%
Won	11(73%)	73%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	116,206.00	58,103.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2018	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 15 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yip Kin Lung v Ding Auto: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Beneficial Ownership Dispute 05 Apr 2020 Yip Kin Lung (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	05 Apr 2020	Yip Kin Lung (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in its entirety.
2	PP v Parthiban Kanapathy: Drug Importation, Chain of Custody, Statement Accuracy 23 Sep 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	23 Sep 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of importing diamorphine.
3	Public Prosecutor v Shah Putra bin Samsuddin: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Nov 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	29 Nov 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe Prosecution successfully convicted the defendant.
4	PP v Paner Selvom: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Mar 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	18 Mar 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against both accused.
5	Praveen s/o Krishnan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Offences & Sentencing of Young Offenders 28 Dec 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	28 Dec 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence of reformative training was dismissed, and the sentence was substituted with probation.
6	MWA Capital Pte Ltd v Ivy Lee Realty Pte Ltd: Winding Up, Interest Rates & Moneylenders Act 29 Aug 2017 Evan Lim Industrial / Warehousing Development Pte Ltd (Appellant, Creditor)Lost	29 Aug 2017	Evan Lim Industrial / Warehousing Development Pte Ltd (Appellant, Creditor): Appeal DismissedChallenge to MWA's interest rates dismissed.
7	Public Prosecutor v Zamri Bin Mohd Tahir: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 02 May 2017 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	02 May 2017	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted on Charge B1 and sentenced to death. Charge B2 withdrawn.
8	Public Prosecutor v Tan Kim Hup: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 19 Oct 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	19 Oct 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of drug trafficking.
9	Public Prosecutor v Azuar Bin Ahamad: Rape, Sexual Assault, and Use of Stupefying Drugs 24 Jul 2014 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	24 Jul 2014	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty and sentenced.
10	Ng Chun Hian v PP: Kleptomania, House-Breaking, and Sentencing Considerations 18 Feb 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	18 Feb 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and case remitted to the District Judge for a Newton hearing.
11	Sim Choon Wee Kenny v Public Prosecutor: Appeals on Custodial Sentence for Offenses Involving Underage Prostitute 19 Sep 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	19 Sep 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed.
12	Quek Tiong Kheng v Chang Choong Khoon: Appeal on Investment Losses and Claims of Fraud and Misrepresentation 13 Feb 2013 Karin Yan (Defendant, Respondent)Won	13 Feb 2013	Karin Yan (Defendant, Respondent): Claim DismissedClaim against Karin Yan was dismissed with costs of $116,206 plus $6,995 court fees on taxation (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	APZ v AQA: Inheritance Claim for Autistic Son's Maintenance 12 Apr 2011 AQA (Defendant)Won	12 Apr 2011	AQA (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed.
14	MB v MC: Appeal for Variation of Maintenance Dismissed 30 Dec 2008 MB (Respondent)Won	30 Dec 2008	MB (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Wife's appeal for a variation of maintenance was dismissed.
15	Lian Kok Hong v Ow Wah Foong: Limitation Act & Negligence in Issuing Termination Certificate 09 Jul 2008 Ow Wah Foong (Respondent)Won	09 Jul 2008	Ow Wah Foong (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.