Yong Ching See v Lee Kah Choo Karen: Resulting Trusts & Beneficial Ownership of Shares

In Yong Ching See v Lee Kah Choo Karen, the High Court of Singapore heard a claim by Yong Ching See against Lee Kah Choo Karen for the transfer of 175,000 shares in Alsecure International Pte Ltd, arguing that the defendant held the shares on trust for the plaintiff. The court, presided over by Justice Lai Siu Chiu, found in favor of the plaintiff, determining that a resulting trust existed and ordering the defendant to transfer the shares to the plaintiff.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for Plaintiff

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Plaintiff claimed defendant held shares on trust for him. Court found a resulting trust existed, ordering defendant to transfer shares to plaintiff.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Yong Ching SeePlaintiffIndividualJudgment for PlaintiffWon
Lee Kah Choo KarenDefendantIndividualClaim DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Lai Siu ChiuJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiff provided funds for Alsecure's paid-up capital.
  2. 175,000 shares in Alsecure were registered in the defendant's name.
  3. Plaintiff claimed the defendant held the shares on trust for him.
  4. Defendant argued the funds were a gift or a loan to Lily.
  5. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was allegedly signed regarding the share ownership.
  6. The plaintiff expressed concerns about his investment in Alsecure.
  7. Proposed sale of Alsecure to the defendant was unsuccessful.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Yong Ching See v Lee Kah Choo Karen, Suit 76/2007, [2008] SGHC 68

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Defendant left employment of Assa Abloy Pte Ltd
Alsecure was incorporated
Plaintiff signed a statement at ACIES Law Corporation
Boon Wei resigned as Chairman and Director of Alsecure
199,998 shares were issued to Lily
174,999 shares were allotted to the defendant
Defendant signed copies of the Memorandum of Understanding
Plaintiff met with the defendant and Lily to discuss his investment
Lily wanted to stop working
Plaintiff commenced proceedings for the return of shares
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Beneficial Ownership
    • Outcome: The court determined that the plaintiff was the beneficial owner of the shares.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Resulting Trust
    • Outcome: The court found that a resulting trust existed, with the defendant holding the shares on trust for the plaintiff.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Estoppel
    • Outcome: The court rejected the defendant's arguments for estoppel by convention and estoppel by representation.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Estoppel by Convention
      • Estoppel by Representation

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Transfer of Shares
  2. Declaration of Beneficial Ownership

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Trust
  • Claim for Beneficial Ownership

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough CouncilN/AYes[1996] AC 669N/ACited for the principle that resulting trusts arise to fulfill the implied intentions of the parties.
Lau Siew Kim v Yeo Guan Chye Terence and AnotherCourt of AppealYes[2007] SGCA 54SingaporeCited for the distinction between the presumption of resulting trust and the resulting trust itself.
Vandervell v IRCN/AYes[1967] 2 AC 291N/ACited for the principle that a resulting trust arises where the donor intends the donee not to take beneficially.
Air Jamaica Ltd v CharltonN/AYes[1999] 1 WLR 1399N/ACited for the principle that a resulting trust responds to the absence of intention to pass a beneficial interest to the recipient.
Re Sick and Funeral Society of St John's Sunday School GolcarN/AYes[1973] Ch 51N/ACited for the principle that any property that a man does not effectually dispose of remains his own.
Dyer v DyerN/AYes(1788) 2 Cox Eq Cas 92N/ACited for the principle that a trust results to the man who advances the purchase-money.
Standing v BowringN/AYes(1885) 31 Ch D 282N/ACited for the principle that trusts are implied to give effect to the true intentions of donors or settlors.
Fowkes v PascoeN/AYes(1875) 10 Ch App. 343N/ACited for the principle that the weight of the presumption of a resulting trust varies in different cases.
Re Sharpe (a bankrupt)N/AYes[1980] 1 WLR 219N/ACited for the principle that the presumption of a resulting trust will be rebutted where evidence shows that money was advanced by way of a loan.
Cheong Yoke Kuen & Ors v Cheong Kwok KiongCourt of AppealYes[1999] 2 SLR 476SingaporeCited for the principle that a resulting trust arises in favour of the purchaser when they pay the purchase price of property conveyed to them jointly with others.
Amalgamated Investment & Property Co Ltd v Texas Commerce International Bank LtdN/AYes[1982] QB 84N/ACited as the locus classicus on the doctrine of estoppel by convention.
Singapore Island Country Club v HilborneN/AYes[1997] 1 SLR 248SingaporeCited for the test for successfully relying on estoppel by convention.
MAE Engineering Ltd v Fire-Stop Marketing Services Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[2005] 1 SLR 379SingaporeCited for the test for successfully relying on estoppel by convention.
United Overseas Bank Ltd v Bank of ChinaN/AYes[2006] 1 SLR 57SingaporeCited for the elements required to successfully raise a defence of estoppel by representation.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Resulting Trust
  • Beneficial Ownership
  • Shares
  • Memorandum of Understanding
  • Investment
  • Loan
  • Estoppel
  • Paid-up Capital
  • Alsecure International Pte Ltd

15.2 Keywords

  • Trusts
  • Shares
  • Beneficial Ownership
  • Singapore
  • High Court
  • Civil Case

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Trusts
  • Equity
  • Company Law