Daniel Koh

Daniel Koh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 43 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 11 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and criminal law. Their track record shows a 30.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 10 complex cases, representing 23% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Daniel Koh has demonstrated expertise across 139 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	30 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 30 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	12 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	11 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patents	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent Revocation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trade names	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agreements for leases	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adduction of Further Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Settlement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Entire Agreement Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Writ of Seizure and Sale	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estoppel by Convention	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Irregularities in proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defective consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Curative powers of court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sub-contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault by penetration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Separate legal personality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutes and regulations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Derivative Actions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Timber Ceiling works	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Franchise Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assignment of Contractual Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
No-Assignment Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non-Compete Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non-Solicitation Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral Variation of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Payment Gateway Services	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Settlement Reports	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Excessive Seizure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Immunity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Auction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Licensing Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patent Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patent Amendments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Familial Rape	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defective Goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mischief by Fire	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estoppel by Representation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Licensing Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Change of position	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Preventive detention	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Presumed Resulting Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Daniel Koh has been affiliated with 11 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 25 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	25 cases	58% of cases	TA Private Capital v UD Trading: Guarantee, Performance Bond & Striking Out Defences(Jan 2024) Song Jianbo v Sunmax Global Capital: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in GIP Investment(Sep 2021) TYN Investment Group v ERC Holdings: Mareva Injunction & Arbitration Act(Jul 2020)
Rajah & Tann	6 cases	14% of cases	Asirham Investment v JSI Shipping: Breach of Contract & Enforceability of Tenancy Agreement(Oct 2007) Shankar Alan v Law Society: Disciplinary Proceedings & Costs After Committee Misconduct(May 2007) Shankar Alan Kulkarni v Law Society: Disciplinary Proceedings & Apparent Bias(Oct 2006)
CTLC Law Corporation	2 cases	5% of cases	T J Systems v Ngow Kheong Shen: Defamation, Fair Comment & Qualified Privilege(Mar 2003) Chye Lian Huat Sawmill Co v Hean Nerng Industrial: Licensing Agreement Dispute over Fees and Termination(Dec 2002)
Engelin Teh & Partners	2 cases	5% of cases	Yugiantoro v Budiono Widodo: Forum Non Conveniens and Oral Agreement Dispute(Nov 2001) Yugiantoro v Budiono Widodo: Forum Non Conveniens & Enforcement of Oral Agreement(Nov 2001)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	5% of cases	Public Prosecutor v UI: Sentencing for Rape of a Minor & Use of Sentencing Precedents(Aug 2008) PP v Huang Rong Tai: Arson, Penal Code s 436, Admissibility of Confessions(Sep 2002)
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	2% of cases	Yong Ching See v Lee Kah Choo Karen: Resulting Trusts & Beneficial Ownership of Shares(May 2008)
Eldan Law LLC	1 cases	2% of cases	TA Private Capital v UD Trading: Striking Out Defenses in Guarantee Claim(Jan 2023)
CNPLaw LLP	1 cases	2% of cases	WWI v WWJ: Testamentary Capacity, Mental Disability & Will Revocation Dispute(Aug 2024)
Rajah and Tann	1 cases	2% of cases	Icadam Technologies v CAD-IT: Defamation in Metal Stamping Software Industry(Jul 2005)
Palakrishnan & Partners	1 cases	2% of cases	Anand Naidu v PP: Drug Trafficking Appeal - Innocent Courier Defense(Nov 2000)
Engelin Teh Practice LLC	1 cases	2% of cases	MRI Worldwide Ltd v Management Recruiters International: Winding Up Petition Based on Disputed Debt(Aug 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Daniel Koh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.5
Complex Cases: 10 (23%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	47.7 parties avg	7.7	9%
Lost	225.1 parties avg	5.1	51%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	2%
Partial	65.8 parties avg	5.8	14%
Won	145.5 parties avg	5.5	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2003	29.6 parties avg	9.6
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2006	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	32.5 parties avg	2.5
2012	62.3 parties avg	2.3
2013	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2014	38.5 parties avg	8.5
2015	46.1 parties avg	6.1
2016	28.0 parties avg	8.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Daniel Koh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	4(9%)	9%
Lost	22(47%)	47%
Neutral	1(2%)	2%
Partial	6(13%)	13%
Won	14(30%)	30%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,033,001.78	317,526.4119 cases	19
USD	2,000,000.00	1,000,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2003	4 112	Dismissed: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 2 cases (50.0%)
2012	6 1311	Dismissed: 1 cases (16.7%) Lost: 3 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 1 cases (16.7%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2015	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2016	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 43 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	WWI v WWJ: Testamentary Capacity, Mental Disability & Will Revocation Dispute 05 Aug 2024 WWI (Appellant)Lost	05 Aug 2024	WWI (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; appellant to bear his own costs.
2	TA Private Capital v UD Trading: Guarantee, Performance Bond & Striking Out Defences 30 Jan 2024 Rutmet Inc (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	30 Jan 2024	Rutmet Inc (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal Dismissed; Defence Struck OutAppeal against the decision of AR Chong dismissed; second defendant's defence struck out.
3	TA Private Capital v UD Trading: Striking Out Defenses in Guarantee Claim 29 Jan 2023 Rutmet Inc (Defendant)Lost	29 Jan 2023	Rutmet Inc (Defendant): Defenses Struck OutDefendant's defenses were struck out. No monetary amount was specified for this defendant.
4	Song Jianbo v Sunmax Global Capital: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in GIP Investment 22 Sep 2021 Li Hua (Defendant)Lost	22 Sep 2021	Li Hua (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant in the sum of $1,237,500 with interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	TYN Investment Group v ERC Holdings: Mareva Injunction & Arbitration Act 27 Jul 2020 ERC Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Jul 2020	ERC Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): Mareva Injunction Granted AgainstMareva injunction granted against the first defendant up to the limit of $2,693,143.32 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Rong Shun Engineering v C.P. Ong Construction: Security of Payment Act Dispute 27 Feb 2017 Rong Shun Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant)Partial	27 Feb 2017	Rong Shun Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant): Partial JudgmentJudgment for the applicant, but part of the adjudication determination was set aside. The remaining amount is $366,507.96 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Max Master Holdings v Taufik Surya Dharma: Share Ownership Dispute & Loan Repayment 24 Jul 2016 Suhadi Zaini (Plaintiff)Dismissed	24 Jul 2016	Suhadi Zaini (Plaintiff): Claim dismissedClaim in Suit 101 dismissed.
8	Chong Chin Fook v Solomon Alliance Management: Derivative Action & Shareholder Rights 22 Feb 2016 Solomon Alliance Management Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	22 Feb 2016	Solomon Alliance Management Pte Ltd (Defendant): WonDefendant was awarded costs of $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	PP v Muhammad & Yu: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act - Death Penalty Imposed 01 Sep 2015 YU CHING THAI (Defendant)Lost	01 Sep 2015	YU CHING THAI (Defendant): GuiltyFound guilty of trafficking 915.60 grams of granular/powdery substance containing not less than 19.84 grams of diamorphine and sentenced to death.
10	See Kian Teck v SG-Bogen Pte Ltd: Breach of Oral Joint Venture Agreement for Construction Project 19 Jul 2015 See Kian Teck (Plaintiff)Won	19 Jul 2015	See Kian Teck (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the defendant is to pay the plaintiff $357,700.50 plus interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Lim Yew Ming v Aik Chuan Construction: Quorum for Shareholder Meeting & Minority Veto 14 Apr 2015 Neoh Siew Inn (Defendant)Lost	14 Apr 2015	Neoh Siew Inn (Defendant): Appeal PursuedThe Defendants pursued an appeal against the order granted to the Plaintiff.
12	PP v Yap Weng Wah: Sexual Offences Against Minors, Penal Code Section 376A 19 Mar 2015 Yap Weng Wah (Defendant)Lost	19 Mar 2015	Yap Weng Wah (Defendant): Convicted and SentencedSentenced to 30 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
13	Total English Learning v Kids Counsel: Franchise Agreement Assignment & Restraint of Trade 30 Nov 2014 Wise Learners Private Limited (Defendant)Lost	30 Nov 2014	Wise Learners Private Limited (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim was dismissed.
14	LH Aluminium v Newcon: Security of Payment Act Adjudication Dispute 27 Nov 2014 LH Aluminium Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	27 Nov 2014	LH Aluminium Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the Plaintiff. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Bogart Malls v Enets: Payment Gateway Services & Breach of Contract Dispute 27 Mar 2014 Bogart Malls Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	27 Mar 2014	Bogart Malls Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiffs’ applications for judgment on admission dismissed.
16	Chiang Sing Jeong v Treasure Resort: Shareholding Dispute & Express Trust Claim 04 Jul 2013 Café Aquarium Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	04 Jul 2013	Café Aquarium Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Loan to be paidMDG to pay the outstanding balance of the Loan to Café.
17	Novartis v Ranbaxy: Patent Amendment, Valsartan, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Singapore 27 Dec 2012 Ranbaxy (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Lost	27 Dec 2012	Ranbaxy (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Application DeniedDefendant's opposition to the plaintiff's application to amend the patent claims was denied.
18	OMG Holdings v Pos Ad: Royalty Payments & Restraint of Trade in Sub-Licensing Agreement 19 Jul 2012 Pos Ad Sdn Bhd (Respondent)Dismissed	19 Jul 2012	Pos Ad Sdn Bhd (Respondent): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Public Prosecutor v Rosli bin Yassin: Cheating, Criminal Breach of Trust, Culpable Homicide, Theft, Forgery 24 Jun 2012 Rosli bin Yassin (Defendant)Lost	24 Jun 2012	Rosli bin Yassin (Defendant): Preventive detention of 12 yearsThe accused was sentenced to 12 years’ preventive detention.
20	South East Enterprises v Hean Nerng: Duties Under Writ of Seizure and Sale 30 May 2012 HEAN NERNG HOLDINGS PTE LTD (Defendant)Won	30 May 2012	HEAN NERNG HOLDINGS PTE LTD (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Chan Heng Kong v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, and Mens Rea 05 Mar 2012 Sng Chun Heng (Appellant)Partial	05 Mar 2012	Sng Chun Heng (Appellant): Conviction AmendedSng Chun Heng's conviction was amended from abetment by instigation to abetment by aiding. Appeal dismissed.
22	Martek v Cargill: Arachidonic Acid Patent Validity - Novelty & Inventive Step 15 Feb 2012 Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	15 Feb 2012	Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Respondent's cross-appeal was dismissed. The Respondent is to pay the Applicant its costs of these proceedings here and before the Tribunal, with such costs to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	OMG Holdings v Pos Ad: Royalty Payments, Misrepresentation & Restraint of Trade 16 Nov 2011 Pos Ad Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Partial	16 Nov 2011	Pos Ad Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Counterclaim dismissed in partDefendant's counterclaim dismissed except for the declaration sought that cl 9.3 of the 2004 Agreement is in restraint of trade. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	Surface Stone v Tay Seng Leon: Discovery of Electronic Documents & Train of Inquiry 04 Oct 2011 Second defendant (Defendant)Neutral	04 Oct 2011	Second defendant (Defendant): NeutralThe second defendant was not directly involved in the present application.
25	Martek v Cargill: Patent Revocation, Microbial Oil Mixtures, and Infant Formula Supplementation 28 Mar 2011 Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	28 Mar 2011	Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd (Respondent): Cross-Appeal Dismissed in PartCross-appeal against the Tribunal’s decision in the Amendment Proceedings is dismissed, except with regard to Claim 42 and consequently Claim 45 in the Proposed 2006 Amendments. The Respondent is ordered to pay the Applicant 95% of its costs for the hearing before the Tribunal and for the appeal before the High Court (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26	Martek v Cargill: Patent Revocation Appeal - Adducing Further Evidence 27 Dec 2010 Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	27 Dec 2010	Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs and the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	Martek Biosciences Corp v Cargill: Patent Revocation Appeal - Adducing Further Evidence 02 May 2010 Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	02 May 2010	Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd (Respondent): Costs awardedCosts of $5,500 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the Applicant to the Respondents as costs of this application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	Public Prosecutor v UI: Sentencing for Rape of a Minor & Use of Sentencing Precedents 04 Aug 2008 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	04 Aug 2008	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was increased.
29	Yong Ching See v Lee Kah Choo Karen: Resulting Trusts & Beneficial Ownership of Shares 07 May 2008 Lee Kah Choo Karen (Defendant)Lost	07 May 2008	Lee Kah Choo Karen (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
30	Asirham Investment v JSI Shipping: Breach of Contract & Enforceability of Tenancy Agreement 03 Oct 2007 Asirham Investment Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	03 Oct 2007	Asirham Investment Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffInterlocutory judgment with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
31	Shankar Alan v Law Society: Disciplinary Proceedings & Costs After Committee Misconduct 16 May 2007 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Lost	16 May 2007	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): LostLeave granted to the Law Society to withdraw the originating summons with costs to the respondent fixed at $150 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore), but no order as to costs for the hearing before the Disciplinary Committee.
32	Shankar Alan Kulkarni v Law Society: Disciplinary Proceedings & Apparent Bias 26 Oct 2006 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Lost	26 Oct 2006	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Application for quashing order grantedThe application for a quashing order was granted against the Law Society of Singapore.
33	PT Muliakeramik v Nam Huat: Security for Costs & Overlapping Defence/Counterclaim 27 Aug 2006 Nam Huat Tiling & Panelling Co Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Aug 2006	Nam Huat Tiling & Panelling Co Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application for security for costs dismissedThe defendant's application for security for costs was dismissed.
34	Rothmans v Maycolson: Trade Mark Registration Opposition & Bad Faith 22 Mar 2006 Maycolson International Ltd (Respondent)Lost	22 Mar 2006	Maycolson International Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay costs on a standard basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
35	Icadam Technologies v CAD-IT: Defamation in Metal Stamping Software Industry 20 Jul 2005 Wong Chee Tieng (Plaintiff)Won	20 Jul 2005	Wong Chee Tieng (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
36	TJ System v Ngow Kheong Shen: Defamation Claim for Email Alleging Bribery 21 Sep 2003 Foong Kok Seng (Plaintiff)Won	21 Sep 2003	Foong Kok Seng (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $20,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
37	T J Systems v Ngow Kheong Shen: Defamation, Fair Comment & Qualified Privilege 30 Mar 2003 Seng Kong Keong (Plaintiff)Dismissed	30 Mar 2003	Seng Kong Keong (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed with costs as the plaintiff did not testify.
38	Chye Lian Huat Sawmill Co v Hean Nerng Industrial: Licensing Agreement Dispute over Fees and Termination 10 Dec 2002 Hean Nerng Industrial Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	10 Dec 2002	Hean Nerng Industrial Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claims DismissedClaims of set-off and counterclaims of the defendants are dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
39	PP v Huang Rong Tai: Arson, Penal Code s 436, Admissibility of Confessions 17 Sep 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Lost	17 Sep 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Charges DismissedCharges against the accused were dismissed due to reasonable doubt. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
40	MRI Worldwide Ltd v Management Recruiters International: Winding Up Petition Based on Disputed Debt 12 Aug 2002 MRI Worldwide Ltd (Petitioner)Lost	12 Aug 2002	MRI Worldwide Ltd (Petitioner): Petition DismissedWinding up petition dismissed with costs to be taxed on the standard basis, if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
41	Yugiantoro v Budiono Widodo: Forum Non Conveniens and Oral Agreement Dispute 19 Nov 2001 Yugiantoro (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	19 Nov 2001	Yugiantoro (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe plaintiff's claim was not explicitly granted a monetary amount in this judgment, but the appeal to stay the proceedings was dismissed, implying the case will proceed. The amount claimed is US$2,000,000. The currency is assumed to be USD as that is the currency of the original agreement.
42	Yugiantoro v Budiono Widodo: Forum Non Conveniens & Enforcement of Oral Agreement 19 Nov 2001 Yugiantoro (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	19 Nov 2001	Yugiantoro (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
43	Anand Naidu v PP: Drug Trafficking Appeal - Innocent Courier Defense 29 Nov 2000 Anand Naidu a/l Raman (Appellant)Lost	29 Nov 2000	Anand Naidu a/l Raman (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.