Estoppel by Convention
Estoppel by Convention is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 19 cases from 2005 to 2021.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Estoppel by Convention, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Drew & Napier LLC25.00% success rate | 4 cases21.1% of area |
WongPartnership LLP50.00% success rate | 2 cases10.5% of area |
MPillay100.00% success rate | 2 cases10.5% of area |
Allen & Gledhill LLP50.00% success rate | 2 cases10.5% of area |
Premier Law LLC0.00% success rate | 2 cases10.5% of area |
Mallal & Namazie100.00% success rate | 1 cases5.3% of area |
Eldan Law LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases5.3% of area |
WNLEX LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases5.3% of area |
Lee & Lee100.00% success rate | 1 cases5.3% of area |
Legal Clinic LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases5.3% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Estoppel by Convention, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Jonathan Lim Shi Cao0.00% success rate | 2 cases10.5% of area |
Yee Mun Howe Gerald0.00% success rate | 2 cases10.5% of area |
Wendy Lin0.00% success rate | 2 cases10.5% of area |
Dhillon Dinesh Singh0.00% success rate | 1 cases5.3% of area |
Gordon Oh0.00% success rate | 1 cases5.3% of area |
Jiang Ke-Yue100.00% success rate | 1 cases5.3% of area |
Tham Feei Sy100.00% success rate | 1 cases5.3% of area |
Quek Mong Hua100.00% success rate | 1 cases5.3% of area |
Nakul Dewan0.00% success rate | 1 cases5.3% of area |
Colin Liew100.00% success rate | 1 cases5.3% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 19 most recent judgments out of 19 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Vasanthan v Ravishankar: Skantek Debt, Contract Formation & Moneylending | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 21 Oct 2021 | Judgment for the first defendant, Loganathan Ravishankar, against the first plaintiff, Metupalle Vasanthan, in the amount of US$388,281.22. All other claims and counterclaims are dismissed. |
2 | Nambu PVD v UBTS: Exclusion Clauses & Contractual Terms in Machine Transport | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 19 Oct 2021 | Both appeals dismissed. |
3 | VKC v VJZ: Anti-Suit Injunction & Exclusive Jurisdiction in Estate Dispute | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 28 Jul 2021 | Appeal Dismissed |
4 | Tamar Perry v Bonnet Esculier: Interpleader, Striking Out, Pleadings Amendment in Offshore Case | Singapore International Commercial Court | 29 Oct 2020 | Application to strike out the unjust enrichment claim succeeded. Leave to amend the Writ and Statement of Claim was not granted in certain respects. The case was designated as an Offshore case. |
5 | BRQ v BRS: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Cost Overrun & BPTA Charges | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 17 Nov 2019 | Both applications dismissed, thereby leaving the award intact. |
6 | BXH v BXI: Setting Aside Arbitral Award - Existence & Validity of Arbitration Agreement | High Court | 02 Sep 2019 | Application dismissed |
7 | Ong Keh Choo v Paul Huntington Bernardo: Dispute over Option to Purchase Agreement | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 02 Sep 2019 | Plaintiff's claim dismissed. |
8 | - | 23 Apr 2017 | Unknown | |
9 | Didwania v Hauslab: Enforcing Adjudication & Standard of Proof for Novation in Construction | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 16 Mar 2017 | Appeal Dismissed |
10 | G-Fuel Pte Ltd v. Gulf Petrochem Pte Ltd: Dispute over Marine Fuel Oil Contract Formation | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 13 Apr 2016 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
11 | Bunge SA v Indian Bank: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of Undertaking | High Court | 29 Dec 2015 | Singapore proceedings stayed in favour of India as the more appropriate forum. |
12 | Boustead Singapore Ltd v Arab Banking Corp: Fraud, Demand Guarantees & Unconscionability | High Court | 10 Mar 2015 | Judgment for Plaintiff; ABC is injuncted from receiving payment from Boustead under the facility agreement demand and is injuncted from making payment to BCD on BCD’s counter-guarantee demands. The event-of-default notice is invalid. |
13 | Fairview v Ong & Ong: Architectural Services Dispute & Wrongful Termination | Court of Appeal | 19 Jan 2014 | Fairview's appeal dismissed; Ong & Ong's appeal allowed. |
14 | Holland Leedon v C & P Transport: Warehouseman Negligence & Liability for Damaged Metal Coils | High Court | 30 Dec 2013 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
15 | Seng Swee Leng v Wong Chong Weng: Specific Performance of Property Sale Agreement Dispute | Court of Appeal | 27 Nov 2011 | Appeal Allowed |
16 | Yong Ching See v Lee Kah Choo Karen: Resulting Trusts & Beneficial Ownership of Shares | High Court | 07 May 2008 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
17 | Travista Development v Tan Kim Swee: Breach of Contract & Estoppel in Property Redevelopment | High Court | 17 Jun 2007 | The plaintiff’s application was dismissed and the defendants’ counterclaim was allowed. The sale and purchase agreement was rescinded, the deposit was forfeited, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay damages. |
18 | Chew Tong Seng v Chew Cheng Quee: Resulting Trust, Advancement, Estoppel & Minority Shareholder Oppression | High Court | 22 Aug 2006 | Judgment for Plaintiffs in Suit 333/2005; Originating Summons 1591/2004 dismissed. |
19 | China Construction v Spandeck: Lump Sum Contract Dispute in Construction Project | High Court | 28 Apr 2005 | Judgment for Plaintiff |