Singapore Land Authority

Singapore Land Authority is a government agency in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 18 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 6 complex cases, representing 66.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Singapore Land Authority has been represented by 4 law firms and 18 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 case	Teo Meng Hui Jocelyn Khoo Boo Jin Fu Qijing Lee Hui Min Enoch Wong Tang Shangjun Jessie Lim Szetoh Khai Hoe Terence Faith Boey Leon Michael Ryan
Wong Partnership	1 case	Tan Chee Meng
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 case	Peh Aik Hin Kristy Tan Edwin Tong
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Tang Li Ling Yvonne Dedar Singh Gill Yvonne Tang

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Singapore Land Authority's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 6 (66.7%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	11.1%
Partial	24.5 parties avg	4.5	22.2%
Won	63.2 parties avg	3.2	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2017	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Singapore Land Authority's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(11.1%)	11.1%
Partial	2(22.2%)	22.2%
Won	6(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2020-sghc-123 16 Jun 2020	16 Jun 2020	Defendant, Respondent	PartialThe assistant registrar’s decision to strike out the Acquisition Challenge Claim is upheld.
2	2020-sghc-90 03 May 2020	03 May 2020	Respondent	WonThe application against the Singapore Land Authority was dismissed.
3	2019-sghcr-12 17 Dec 2019	17 Dec 2019	Defendant	WonThe defendant's application to strike out the action was granted.
4	2019-sgca-23 09 Apr 2019	09 Apr 2019	Respondent	PartialThe court granted declarations that Mr. Adam adversely acquired title to the House (occupying an area of 405.5m2) in 1967 by virtue of his adverse possession and that all rights and title to the House held by the paper owners were extinguished in 1967.
5	2017-sghc-19 12 Feb 2017	12 Feb 2017	Respondent	WonThe Singapore Land Authority successfully defended against the applicant's claim.
6	2013-sghc-262 26 Nov 2013	26 Nov 2013	Respondent	WonSuccessfully defended against the application for judicial review; applicant to pay costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	2011-sghc-240 03 Nov 2011	03 Nov 2011	Other	NeutralSLA was the victim of the fraud.
8	2009-sgca-2 05 Jan 2009	05 Jan 2009	Respondent, Applicant	WonApplication to strike out the Notice of Appeal is allowed with costs.
9	2008-sghc-42 24 Mar 2008	24 Mar 2008	Respondent, Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff; inquiry as to damages or, at SLA’s option, an account of profits. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).