Namasivayam Srinivasan

Namasivayam Srinivasan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and negligence. Their track record shows a 31.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 19% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated expertise across 49 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Personal Injury	15 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	10 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Negligence	9 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	7 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	6 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Expenses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Worker Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Motor Traffic Accident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bereavement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Funeral Expenses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipwright	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Head Injuries	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Motorcycle Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dependency Claim	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Apportionment of Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hearsay	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Earning Capacity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Namasivayam Srinivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Namasivayam Srinivasan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 15 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Hoh Law Corporation	15 cases	94% of cases	The Subsidiary Management Corporation v Janaed: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Contributory Negligence at Westgate Tower(Jun 2022) Alam Jahangir v Mega Metal Pte Ltd: Assessment of Damages for Workplace Injury(Jun 2019) Alam Jahangir v Mega Metal Pte Ltd: Negligence, Contributory Negligence, and Employer's Duty of Care in Workplace Injury(Sep 2018)
Hoh & Partners	1 cases	6% of cases	Zhao Feng Guo v Tan Hong Soon: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Illegality and Improper Service(May 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Namasivayam Srinivasan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 3 (19%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	13%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	6%
Partial	82.9 parties avg	2.9	50%
Won	52.4 parties avg	2.4	31%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2014	23.7 parties avg	3.7
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Namasivayam Srinivasan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(13%)	13%
Neutral	1(6%)	6%
Partial	8(50%)	50%
Won	5(31%)	31%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,123,605.12	112,360.5110 cases	10

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	The Subsidiary Management Corporation v Janaed: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Contributory Negligence at Westgate Tower 20 Jun 2022 Janaed (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	20 Jun 2022	Janaed (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedJanaed's appeal against STA and MCST was dismissed.
2	Alam Jahangir v Mega Metal Pte Ltd: Assessment of Damages for Workplace Injury 18 Jun 2019 Alam Jahangir (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	18 Jun 2019	Alam Jahangir (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Judgment for PlaintiffThe defendant is to pay the plaintiff the sum of $81,593.11 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Alam Jahangir v Mega Metal Pte Ltd: Negligence, Contributory Negligence, and Employer's Duty of Care in Workplace Injury 16 Sep 2018 Alam Jahangir (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	16 Sep 2018	Alam Jahangir (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Plaintiff, damages apportioned with Plaintiff found 50% contributorily negligent. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Ong Kim Teck v Quek Chin Hwa: Assessment of Damages for Workplace Injury 21 Nov 2017 Ong Kim Teck (Plaintiff)Won	21 Nov 2017	Ong Kim Teck (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffTotal damages awarded to the Plaintiff: $244,265.60 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Chai Yew Cian v Yeoh Yeow Yee: Negligence in Road Traffic Accident at Jurong Town Hall Road Junction 29 Apr 2015 Chai Yew Cian (Plaintiff)Won	29 Apr 2015	Chai Yew Cian (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff against all the defendants for damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Chen Qiangshi v Hong Fei CDY Construction: Negligence in Construction Site Accident 08 Sep 2014 Chen Qiangshi (Plaintiff)Partial	08 Sep 2014	Chen Qiangshi (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff; liability reduced by 50% due to contributory negligence.Judgment for the Plaintiff, but the damages recoverable are reduced by 50% due to the Plaintiff's contributory negligence. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
7	Wan Kam Fook v Kor Xie Wey: Dependency Claim for Fatal Motor Accident 04 Aug 2014 another (dependents of Chin Talap a/p Wan Kam Fook, deceased) (Plaintiff)Partial	04 Aug 2014	another (dependents of Chin Talap a/p Wan Kam Fook, deceased) (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentPartial judgment in favor of the Plaintiff; damages awarded for loss of dependency, bereavement, and funeral expenses. The total award was $134,926.26, with $67,463.13 allocated to the other Plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Rahman v Lim Keenly Builders: Workmen's Compensation & Insurance Coverage for Subcontractor Employees 06 May 2010 Mohammed Shahid Late Mahabubur Rahman (Plaintiff)Partial	06 May 2010	Mohammed Shahid Late Mahabubur Rahman (Plaintiff): Interlocutory judgment entered at 95% liability in favor of the plaintiffInterlocutory judgment was entered at 95% liability in favor of the plaintiff after the plaintiff settled his claim against the defendant.
9	Keppel Singmarine v Ng Chan Teng: Transfer of Proceedings from District Court to High Court 09 Mar 2010 Ng Chan Teng (Respondent)Lost	09 Mar 2010	Ng Chan Teng (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the appellant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
10	Loh Chia Mei v Koh Kok Han: Personal Injury, Negligence, & Damages Assessment 10 Aug 2009 Loh Chia Mei (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	10 Aug 2009	Loh Chia Mei (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAward for loss of earnings varied from $581,940 to $518,940 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Chua Kee Lam v Moksha: Negligence, Road Accidents, and Admissibility of Evidence 05 May 2009 Chua Kee Lam (next friend to Chua Peck Seng) (Appellant)Partial	05 May 2009	Chua Kee Lam (next friend to Chua Peck Seng) (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; liability apportioned with two-thirds to the appellant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Ng Chan Teng v Keppel Singmarine: District Court Jurisdiction & Damages for Industrial Accident 06 Sep 2007 Ng Chan Teng (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	06 Sep 2007	Ng Chan Teng (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, meaning the plaintiff's argument regarding the calculation of damages was accepted.
13	Tan Sia Boo v Ong Chiang Kwong: Appeal on Assessment of Damages and Admissibility of Fresh Evidence 15 Aug 2007 Tan Sia Boo (Plaintiff)Neutral	15 Aug 2007	Tan Sia Boo (Plaintiff): Appeal on damagesPlaintiff appealed on the award of damages. The outcome of the appeal is not stated in the judgment.
14	Chong Hwa Wee v Estate of Loh Hon Fock: Damages for Brain Injury and Loss of Amenities 10 May 2006 Chong Hwa Wee (by his Committee of Person and Estate, Chong Hwa Yin) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	10 May 2006	Chong Hwa Wee (by his Committee of Person and Estate, Chong Hwa Yin) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed except for the claim of the plaintiff’s mother for her loss of earnings. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Tan Woei Jinn v Thapjang Amorthap: Assessment of Damages for Foreign Worker's Injury 15 Mar 2005 Tan Woei Jinn (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	15 Mar 2005	Tan Woei Jinn (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe award for pre-trial loss of earnings was adjusted to $32,190.15, and the award for loss of future earnings was adjusted to $111,690. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Zhao Feng Guo v Tan Hong Soon: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Illegality and Improper Service 05 May 2003 Zhao Feng Guo (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	05 May 2003	Zhao Feng Guo (Plaintiff, Respondent): Judgment upheldThe plaintiff's interlocutory judgment was upheld as the defendant's appeal was dismissed.