Shafeeg bin Salim Talib v Helmi bin Ali: Striking Out & Forum Non Conveniens

Shafeeg bin Salim Talib and another, as plaintiffs, sued Helmi bin Ali bin Salim bin Talib and others, as defendants, in the High Court of Singapore, seeking an account of monies due from Al Taleb to the estate of Obeidillah bin Salim bin Talib. The defendants applied to strike out the claim and stay the proceedings on the ground of forum non conveniens. The High Court allowed the defendants' appeal, finding that the plaintiffs lacked locus standi under Singapore law and that Egypt was the more appropriate forum.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Allowed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal regarding striking out a claim and staying proceedings based on forum non conveniens. The court allowed the appeal, finding Singapore an inappropriate forum.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Philip PillaiJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiffs are the Singapore administrators of the estate of Obeidillah bin Salim bin Talib, who died intestate.
  2. The Deceased had assets in Singapore, Malaysia, and Egypt, including a share in an Egyptian civil property company, Al Taleb Al Akaria.
  3. The defendants are beneficiaries of the Deceased’s estate and former directors/managers of Al Taleb.
  4. The Cairo Court Order resulted in Al Taleb being placed under temporary receivership with a court-appointed receiver.
  5. The Singapore Grant obtained by the plaintiffs contains a schedule that lists the Al Taleb shares under "Property in respect of which the Grant is not to be made".

5. Formal Citations

  1. Shafeeg bin Salim Talib and another v Helmi bin Ali bin Salim bin Talib and others, Suit No 261 of 2010 (Registrar's Appeal No 80 of 2011 and Registrar's Appeal No 81 of 2011), [2011] SGHC 165

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Obeidillah bin Salim bin Talib died intestate
Inheritance Certificate issued by the Singapore Syariah Court
Defendants appointed as directors/managers of Al Taleb
Order of Court for Grant of Letters of Administration
Defendants removed as directors/managers of Al Taleb pursuant to Cairo Court Order
Plaintiffs' applications in Originating Summons No 1406 of 2008/P
Suit No 261 of 2010/G converted from Originating Summons No 1406/2008/P
Defendants' application to strike out the plaintiffs’ claim under O 18 r 19(1) of the ROC
Defendants' application to stay Suit No 261 of 2010/G on the ground of forum non conveniens
AR dismissed the striking out application
AR dismissed the stay application
Cairo court upheld the decision of the lower court to annul the defendants’ appointment as directors/managers of Al Taleb
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Locus Standi
    • Outcome: The court held that the plaintiffs, as administrators of the Deceased’s estate, do not have any right, title or interest in respect of the Deceased’s Al Taleb shares either by implication or by the express text of the Singapore Grant and therefore lack locus standi.
    • Category: Procedural
  2. Forum Non Conveniens
    • Outcome: The court held that the courts of Egypt are the more appropriate forum for hearing the dispute.
    • Category: Jurisdictional

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Order for accounting of monies due
  2. Payment of monies due
  3. Production of audited accounts and documentary evidence
  4. Payment of costs
  5. Withholding payments to defendants

9. Cause of Actions

  • Accounting for monies due
  • Recovery of assets

10. Practice Areas

  • Litigation
  • Forum Non Conveniens
  • Striking Out

11. Industries

  • Real Estate

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Alliance Entertainment Singapore Pte Ltd v Sim Kay Teck and AnotherHigh CourtYes[2007] 2 SLR(R) 869SingaporeCited for the principle that failure to establish title to commence legal action provides sufficient grounds for striking out.
Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex LtdHouse of LordsYes[1987] AC 460England and WalesCited for the principles of forum non conveniens.
CIMB Bank Bhd v Dresdner Kleinwort LtdCourt of AppealYes[2008] 4 SLR(R) 543SingaporeCited for restating the principles of forum non conveniens as set out in Spiliada.
Rickshaw Investments Ltd v Nicolai Baron von UexkullHigh CourtYes[2007] 1 SLR(R) 377SingaporeCited for the principle that the applicable law to the dispute is a relevant and significant connecting factor in determining forum non conveniens.
PT Hutan Domas Raya v Yue Xiu Enterprises (Holdings) Ltd and anotherCourt of AppealYes[2001] 1 SLR(R) 104SingaporeCited for the second stage of the Spiliada test regarding circumstances where justice requires that a stay should nevertheless not be granted.
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v Bhavani Stores Pte LtdCourt of AppealNo[1997] 3 SLR(R) 363SingaporeCited for the principle that a bare assertion of likely delay would not suffice to merit a stay of proceedings.
Zheng Yu Shan v Lian Beng Construction (1988) Pte LtdHigh CourtNo[2009] 2 SLR(R) 587SingaporeCited for the principle that where there is any doubt as to the proper functioning of foreign judicial institutions, that doubt should be resolved against the plaintiffs who so assert.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2006 Rev Ed)Singapore
Estate Duty Act (Cap 96, 2005 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Al Taleb Al Akaria
  • Singapore Grant
  • Cairo Court Order
  • Forum non conveniens
  • Lex fori
  • Locus standi
  • Receiver
  • Estate Duty Act

15.2 Keywords

  • Striking out
  • Forum non conveniens
  • Estate administration
  • Singapore
  • Egypt
  • Locus standi

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Civil Procedure
  • Conflict of Laws
  • Estate Administration