Public Prosecutor v Tan Kheng Chun Ray: Drug Offences - Importing Diamorphine & Methamphetamine

In Public Prosecutor v Tan Kheng Chun Ray, the High Court of Singapore sentenced Ray Tan Kheng Chun on August 4, 2011, after he pleaded guilty to seven drug offenses under the Misuse of Drugs Act, including importing diamorphine and methamphetamine. The court sentenced him to 27 years' imprisonment and 20 strokes of the cane, ordering the sentences for the importation offenses to run consecutively.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Accused sentenced to 27 years’ imprisonment and 20 strokes of the cane.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Ray Tan Kheng Chun pleaded guilty to drug offenses, including importing diamorphine and methamphetamine. The High Court sentenced him to 27 years' imprisonment and 20 strokes of the cane.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyJudgment for the ProsecutionWon
Gordon Oh of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Peggy Pao of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Tan Kheng Chun RayDefendantIndividualConviction and SentencingLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Kan Ting ChiuJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Gordon OhAttorney-General’s Chambers
Peggy PaoAttorney-General’s Chambers
Sunil SudheesanKhattarWong
Subhas AnandanKhattarWong

4. Facts

  1. The accused pleaded guilty to seven charges under the Misuse of Drugs Act.
  2. The accused imported not less than 14.99 grams of diamorphine.
  3. The accused imported not less than 1.12 grams of methamphetamine.
  4. The accused consumed methamphetamine.
  5. The accused possessed utensils intended for the consumption of controlled drugs.
  6. The accused possessed three tablets of nimetazepam.
  7. The accused cooperated with authorities after his arrest.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Tan Kheng Chun Ray, Criminal Case No 6 of 2011, [2011] SGHC 183

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Accused committed drug offences at Woodlands Checkpoint.
Utensils and nimetazepam recovered from accused’s residence.
Urine sample of accused taken.
Judgment issued by the High Court.
Appeal allowed by the Court of Appeal.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Drug Importation
    • Outcome: The court found the accused guilty of importing diamorphine and methamphetamine.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Sentencing for Drug Offences
    • Outcome: The court considered the 'one transaction rule', the totality principle, and the proportionality principle in determining the appropriate sentence.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Related Cases:
      • [1991] 2 SLR(R) 874
      • [2009] 3 SLR(R) 414

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Imprisonment
  2. Caning

9. Cause of Actions

  • Importing Diamorphine
  • Importing Methamphetamine
  • Consumption of Methamphetamine
  • Possession of Utensils for Drug Consumption
  • Possession of Nimetazepam

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Kanagasuntharam v Public ProsecutorUnknownYes[1991] 2 SLR(R) 874SingaporeCited for the 'one transaction rule' in sentencing.
Jeffery bin Abdullah v Public ProsecutorUnknownYes[2009] 3 SLR(R) 414SingaporeCited for the totality principle in sentencing.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185 2008 Rev Ed)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (No 15 of 2010)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Diamorphine
  • Methamphetamine
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • Woodlands Checkpoint
  • One transaction rule
  • Totality principle
  • Proportionality principle

15.2 Keywords

  • drug offences
  • diamorphine
  • methamphetamine
  • importation
  • sentencing
  • Singapore
  • criminal law

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Trafficking
  • Sentencing