Subhas Anandan

Subhas Anandan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 79 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 12 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Subhas Anandan has demonstrated expertise across 276 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	72 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 72 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	66 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 66 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	43 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 43 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	28 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 28 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Murder	21 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 21 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	14 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	14 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	13 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 13 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	12 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	12 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	12 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	11 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	11 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	9 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	9 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	8 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	3 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Homicide	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abduction	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Robbery	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cheating	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetment	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Provocation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conversion	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trafficking in controlled drugs	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forensic Science	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private Defence	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sudden fight	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Animal Import/Export Regulations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drag-along Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Custody of Children	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Grievous Hurt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rioting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pre-judgment interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure Obligations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warranty of Authority	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adverse Inference	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Involuntary Bailment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Appeals	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Motor accidents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Principles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Settlement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Time-Fixing Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Promissory estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anticipatory Breach	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Termination of Leases	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Waiver of Right to Forfeiture	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Tenant’s Covenants	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recovery of Possession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Holding Over	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deed of Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Options to purchase	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conditional Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Final Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Set-off	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misfeasance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
En Bloc Sales	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Agents Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reasonableness and Proportionality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cryptoassets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Annulment of bankruptcy order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting aside of bankruptcy order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Powers of the court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Goods and Services Tax (GST)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Input Tax Refunds	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeals	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Approbation and Reprobation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Power of Attorney	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contract of service	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restrictive covenants	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's undertaking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Receiving stolen property	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dividends	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adultery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unreasonable Behaviour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Standard of Proof	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loss of future earnings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Traffic Accident	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of negative covenant	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial comity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Academic Misconduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Records	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Defraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Authority of Agent	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bailment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common object	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Money Laundering	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Rage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Hurt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oaths and Declarations Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arms Offences Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Dispute	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guardianship of Infants Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hearsay	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discovery Obligations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ancillary disclosure order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Clang of the prison gates principle	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Domestic Maid Abuse	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dishonest Misappropriation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Multi-Level Marketing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Money-changing and Remittance Businesses Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Kidnapping	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extortion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Right to Counsel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moneylending Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Presidential Clemency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commutation of Sentence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Life Imprisonment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Criminal Enterprise	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Diplomatic Relations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Human Organ Transplant Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Traffic Offence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Aiding and Abetting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mischief by Fire	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arson	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
General exceptions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Entrapment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Market Misconduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gang Crime	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Post-traumatic stress syndrome	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sodomy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent to Death	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Circumstantial Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Domestic worker abuse	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Late Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Auxiliary Police Regulations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetment of Trafficking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Alibi	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Poisoning	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voluntariness of statement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Official Secrets Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Grave and Sudden Provocation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confessions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Juvenile Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Maid Abuse	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Erinford Injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offences relating to race	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Property Ownership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ponzi Schemes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Validity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Review	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unfair Dismissal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patient Confidentiality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Handwriting Analysis	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Secretarial Services	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Subhas Anandan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Subhas Anandan has been affiliated with 12 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 43 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	43 cases	54% of cases	Sakthivel Punithavathi v PP: Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt & Appellate Intervention(Apr 2007) PP v Lim Ah Seng: Culpable Homicide, Sentencing, Spousal Abuse & Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder(Mar 2007) Law Society v Seah & Teo: Lawyers' Conflict of Interest & Unauthorized Legal Work(Mar 2007)
KhattarWong	15 cases	19% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Tan Kheng Chun Ray: Drug Offences - Importing Diamorphine & Methamphetamine(Aug 2011) Public Prosecutor v Tan Teck Soon: Culpable Homicide and Sentencing(May 2011) Eu Lim Hoklai v Public Prosecutor: Culpable Homicide, Sudden Fight, and Provocation(Apr 2011)
RHTLaw Taylor Wessing LLP	5 cases	6% of cases	Lim Ghim Peow v PP: Culpable Homicide & Diminished Responsibility Sentencing(Oct 2014) Geyabalan v Public Prosecutor: Theft Conviction Appeal - Baggage Handlers at Changi Airport(Sep 2014) Ajmer Singh v Chua Hock Kwee: Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Witness Testimony(Mar 2013)
RHT Law LLP	4 cases	5% of cases	Mathavakannan v Attorney-General: Interpretation of 'Life Imprisonment' in Presidential Clemency(Feb 2012) Tan Kheng Chun Ray v PP: Drug Importation & Consumption under Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2012) Phang Wah v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Trading, CBT, Falsification of Accounts(Nov 2011)
Khattar Wong	3 cases	4% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Ong Pang Siew: Culpable Homicide Sentencing After Diminished Responsibility Finding(Jul 2011) Public Prosecutor v Daniel Vijay: Sentencing for Robbery with Hurt after Murder Conviction Overturned(Nov 2010) PP v Daniel Vijay: Joint Murder Charge for Robbery Resulting in Death(Jul 2008)
MPD Nair & Co	2 cases	3% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Heah Lian Khin: Official Secrets Act Violation & Witness Credibility(Jul 2000) Lau Lee Peng v PP: Grave and Sudden Provocation in Murder Case(Mar 2000)
Harry Elias & Partners	2 cases	3% of cases	PP v Leong Siew Chor: Murder, Consent to Death & Admissibility of Statements(May 2006) Vignes v PP: Trafficking, Lack of Knowledge & Abetment of Drug Trafficking(Jan 2003)
M/S Khattarwong	1 cases	1% of cases	Whang Sung Lin v PP: Abetment of Illegal Kidney Transplant Arrangement(Feb 2010)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	1% of cases	PP v Lam Chen Fong: Criminal Breach of Trust, Corruption, and Confiscation of Benefits(Jul 2002)
Harry Elias and Partners	1 cases	1% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Vijayakumar: Murder, Private Defence & Penal Code Exceptions(Nov 2005)
Briefed	1 cases	1% of cases	PP v Tan Siew Lam: Trafficking of Morphine & Knowledge of Drug Possession under Misuse of Drugs Act(Aug 2000)
KhattarWong LLP	1 cases	1% of cases	Pathip Selvan v PP: Culpable Homicide & Provocation in Fatal Stabbing(Aug 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Subhas Anandan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 6 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	562.5 parties avg	2.5	71%
Partial	102.8 parties avg	2.8	13%
Remanded	12.0 parties avg	2.0	1%
Unknown	12.0 parties avg	2.0	1%
Won	112.1 parties avg	2.1	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2001	52.4 parties avg	2.4
2002	72.3 parties avg	2.3
2003	82.4 parties avg	2.4
2004	102.6 parties avg	2.6
2005	52.2 parties avg	2.2
2006	82.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	63.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	62.7 parties avg	2.7
2011	63.1 parties avg	3.1
2012	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Subhas Anandan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	56(71%)	71%
Partial	10(13%)	13%
Remanded	1(1%)	1%
Unknown	1(1%)	1%
Won	11(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	183,500.00	16,681.8211 cases	11

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Remanded: 1 cases (33.3%)
2001	5 41	Lost: 4 cases (80.0%) Unknown: 1 cases (20.0%)
2002	7 7	Lost: 7 cases (100.0%)
2003	8 611	Lost: 6 cases (75.0%) Partial: 1 cases (12.5%) Won: 1 cases (12.5%)
2004	10 82	Lost: 8 cases (80.0%) Partial: 2 cases (20.0%)
2005	5 41	Lost: 4 cases (80.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2006	8 62	Lost: 6 cases (75.0%) Won: 2 cases (25.0%)
2007	6 51	Lost: 5 cases (83.3%) Won: 1 cases (16.7%)
2008	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	5 221	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2010	6 321	Lost: 3 cases (50.0%) Partial: 2 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (16.7%)
2011	6 51	Lost: 5 cases (83.3%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%)
2012	5 122	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 79 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Ghim Peow v PP: Culpable Homicide & Diminished Responsibility Sentencing 16 Oct 2014 Lim Ghim Peow (Appellant)Lost	16 Oct 2014	Lim Ghim Peow (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his sentence of 20 years' imprisonment was dismissed.
2	Geyabalan v Public Prosecutor: Theft Conviction Appeal - Baggage Handlers at Changi Airport 03 Sep 2014 Nagas s/o Arumugam (Appellant)Won	03 Sep 2014	Nagas s/o Arumugam (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppellant's appeal against conviction and sentence was allowed.
3	Ajmer Singh v Chua Hock Kwee: Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Witness Testimony 10 Mar 2013 Ajmer Singh s/o Ajit Singh (Appellant)Won	10 Mar 2013	Ajmer Singh s/o Ajit Singh (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against conviction allowed; fine of $1,000 to be refunded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Ong Mingwee v Public Prosecutor: Rape Conviction Appeal - Consent and Mistake of Fact 29 Nov 2012 Ong Mingwee (alias Wang Mingwei) (Appellant)Won	29 Nov 2012	Ong Mingwee (alias Wang Mingwei) (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppellant's appeal against conviction was allowed, and the sentence was set aside.
5	Phang Wah v PP: Fraudulent Trading under Companies Act & Public Interest Law 22 Oct 2012 Phang Wah (Appellant)Lost	22 Oct 2012	Phang Wah (Appellant): Reference DismissedThe criminal reference was dismissed as no question of law of public interest arose.
6	Pathip Selvan v PP: Culpable Homicide & Provocation in Fatal Stabbing 14 Aug 2012 Pathip Selvan s/o Sugumaran (Appellant)Partial	14 Aug 2012	Pathip Selvan s/o Sugumaran (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partConviction for murder set aside; accused convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
7	Mathavakannan v Attorney-General: Interpretation of 'Life Imprisonment' in Presidential Clemency 26 Feb 2012 Mathavakannan s/o Kalimuthu (Plaintiff)Won	26 Feb 2012	Mathavakannan s/o Kalimuthu (Plaintiff): Favourable Interpretation of Commutation OrderThe court declared that the President’s commutation order for the Plaintiff to be “imprisoned for life” referred to an imprisonment term of 20 years.
8	Tan Kheng Chun Ray v PP: Drug Importation & Consumption under Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Feb 2012 Tan Kheng Chun Ray (Appellant)Partial	02 Feb 2012	Tan Kheng Chun Ray (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartTotal sentence reduced to 22 years and 8 months’ imprisonment with 20 strokes of the cane.
9	Phang Wah v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Trading, CBT, Falsification of Accounts 20 Nov 2011 Neo Kuon Huay (Appellant)Lost	20 Nov 2011	Neo Kuon Huay (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction dismissed.
10	PP v Koh Seah Wee & Lim Chai Meng: Public Servants' Corruption & Cheating 03 Nov 2011 Lim Chai Meng (Defendant)Lost	03 Nov 2011	Lim Chai Meng (Defendant): Sentenced to imprisonmentLim was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment.
11	Public Prosecutor v Tan Kheng Chun Ray: Drug Offences - Importing Diamorphine & Methamphetamine 03 Aug 2011 Tan Kheng Chun Ray (Defendant)Lost	03 Aug 2011	Tan Kheng Chun Ray (Defendant): Conviction and SentencingAccused sentenced to 27 years’ imprisonment and 20 strokes of the cane.
12	Public Prosecutor v Ong Pang Siew: Culpable Homicide Sentencing After Diminished Responsibility Finding 26 Jul 2011 Ong Pang Siew (Defendant)Lost	26 Jul 2011	Ong Pang Siew (Defendant): ImprisonmentThe accused was sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment backdated to 20 October 2007.
13	Public Prosecutor v Tan Teck Soon: Culpable Homicide and Sentencing 25 May 2011 Tan Teck Soon (Defendant)Lost	25 May 2011	Tan Teck Soon (Defendant): ConvictedThe accused was convicted of culpable homicide and sentenced to 14 years' imprisonment.
14	Eu Lim Hoklai v Public Prosecutor: Culpable Homicide, Sudden Fight, and Provocation 11 Apr 2011 Eu Lim Hoklai (Appellant)Partial	11 Apr 2011	Eu Lim Hoklai (Appellant): Conviction of murder set aside; guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murderThe Court of Appeal set aside the accused’s conviction of murder under s 300(c) of the Penal Code and found him guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder under s 299 of the Penal Code. The case is remitted to the Judge for sentencing pursuant to s 304(a) of the Penal Code.
15	PP v Pathip Selvan: Murder, Provocation, and Diminished Responsibility 11 Nov 2010 Pathip Selvan s/o Sugumaran (Defendant)Lost	11 Nov 2010	Pathip Selvan s/o Sugumaran (Defendant): GuiltyAccused found guilty of murder as charged.
16	Public Prosecutor v Daniel Vijay: Sentencing for Robbery with Hurt after Murder Conviction Overturned 10 Nov 2010 Christopher Samson s/o Anpalagan (Defendant)Lost	10 Nov 2010	Christopher Samson s/o Anpalagan (Defendant): SentencedSentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane for robbery with hurt.
17	Ong Pang Siew v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction Appeal Based on Diminished Responsibility 07 Nov 2010 Ong Pang Siew (Appellant)Won	07 Nov 2010	Ong Pang Siew (Appellant): Appeal AllowedConviction on the charge of murder set aside; convicted on a charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
18	Daniel Vijay v PP: Joint Murder Charge & Common Intention in Robbery 02 Sep 2010 Christopher Samson s/o Anpalagan (Appellant)Partial	02 Sep 2010	Christopher Samson s/o Anpalagan (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartMurder conviction set aside; convicted of robbery with hurt under Section 394 of the Penal Code read with Section 34.
19	Whang Sung Lin v PP: Abetment of Illegal Kidney Transplant Arrangement 11 Feb 2010 Whang Sung Lin (Appellant)Partial	11 Feb 2010	Whang Sung Lin (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in partAppeal against conviction dismissed. Sentence reduced from eight months’ imprisonment to four months’ imprisonment.
20	Public Prosecutor v Pang Siew Fum: Trafficking of Diamorphine 03 Feb 2010 Pang Siew Fum (Defendant)Lost	03 Feb 2010	Pang Siew Fum (Defendant): ConvictedFound guilty of drug trafficking and sentenced to death.
21	Tat Seng v Orix: Conversion, Bailment, and Rights of Bailors in Machine Transportation 10 Sep 2009 Tat Seng Machine Movers Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	10 Sep 2009	Tat Seng Machine Movers Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Tat Seng is not liable for conversion.
22	Public Prosecutor v Ong Pang Siew: Culpable Homicide and Diminished Responsibility 29 Jul 2009 Ong Pang Siew (Defendant)Lost	29 Jul 2009	Ong Pang Siew (Defendant): Guilty of murder
23	PP v Eu Lim Hoklai: Murder, Private Defence, Grave and Sudden Provocation 29 Jun 2009 Eu Lim Hoklai (Defendant)Lost	29 Jun 2009	Eu Lim Hoklai (Defendant): Mandatory death sentence imposed
24	Lim Hong Eng v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Dangerous Driving Conviction and Sentence 16 Apr 2009 Lim Hong Eng (Appellant)Partial	16 Apr 2009	Lim Hong Eng (Appellant): Appeal allowed in part on sentence for first charge; convicted on amended second charge.Appeal against conviction for dangerous driving dismissed, but sentence reduced to one day's imprisonment. The charge of causing grievous hurt by a rash act was amended to dangerous driving, and the appellant was fined $2,000 with two months' imprisonment in default of payment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
25	Teo Sew Eng v Public Prosecutor: Aiding and Abetting Mischief by Fire in Family Dispute 12 Apr 2009 Teo Sew Eng (Appellant)Partial	12 Apr 2009	Teo Sew Eng (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partSentence reduced from six months to two months imprisonment.
26	PP v Daniel Vijay: Joint Murder Charge for Robbery Resulting in Death 27 Jul 2008 Christopher Samson s/o Anpalagan (Defendant)Lost	27 Jul 2008	Christopher Samson s/o Anpalagan (Defendant): Guilty as chargedConvicted and passed the mandatory death sentence.
27	Tan Chor Jin v PP: Arms Offenses, Intoxication, Accident, Private Defence & Right to Counsel 17 Jul 2008 Tan Chor Jin (Appellant)Lost	17 Jul 2008	Tan Chor Jin (Appellant): Appeal DismissedTan Chor Jin's appeal against his conviction was dismissed.
28	Public Prosecutor v Norezam bin Mohsin: Sentencing Parity in Culpable Homicide Case 16 Oct 2007 Abdul Razak Bin Abdul Hamid (Defendant)Lost	16 Oct 2007	Abdul Razak Bin Abdul Hamid (Defendant): Imprisonment and CaningSentenced to ten years imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane.
29	Public Prosecutor v Teo Chwee Kow: Culpable Homicide Sentencing 26 Sep 2007 Teo Chwee Kow (Accused)Lost	26 Sep 2007	Teo Chwee Kow (Accused): Sentence imposedAccused sentenced to nine years imprisonment.
30	Sakthivel Punithavathi v PP: Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt & Appellate Intervention 17 Apr 2007 Sakthivel Punithavathi (Appellant)Won	17 Apr 2007	Sakthivel Punithavathi (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against conviction was allowed, and the appellant was acquitted.
31	PP v Lim Ah Seng: Culpable Homicide, Sentencing, Spousal Abuse & Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder 25 Mar 2007 Lim Ah Seng (Defendant)Lost	25 Mar 2007	Lim Ah Seng (Defendant): ImprisonmentThe accused was sentenced to two years and six months’ imprisonment backdated to date of arrest.
32	Law Society v Seah & Teo: Lawyers' Conflict of Interest & Unauthorized Legal Work 21 Mar 2007 Teo Kim Soon Danny (Respondent)Lost	21 Mar 2007	Teo Kim Soon Danny (Respondent): Suspended from practice for 18 monthsRespondent was suspended from practice for 18 months (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
33	Public Prosecutor v Han John Han: Culpable Homicide and Delusional Disorder 14 Jan 2007 Han John Han (Defendant)Lost	14 Jan 2007	Han John Han (Defendant): Sentence of three years imprisonmentAccused sentenced to three years imprisonment.
34	Leong Siew Chor v Public Prosecutor: Admissibility of Statements and Assessment of Witness Credibility in Murder Conviction Appeal 05 Oct 2006 Leong Siew Chor (Appellant)Lost	05 Oct 2006	Leong Siew Chor (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the murder conviction was dismissed.
35	Jagatheesan v PP: Drug Trafficking Conviction Appeal Based on Accomplice Testimony 23 Jul 2006 Jagatheesan s/o Krishnasamy (Appellant)Won	23 Jul 2006	Jagatheesan s/o Krishnasamy (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the convictions were set aside.
36	Tan Kay Beng v PP: Theft & Criminal Intimidation Sentencing Appeal 06 Jul 2006 Tan Kay Beng (Appellant)Won	06 Jul 2006	Tan Kay Beng (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against sentences for theft and criminal intimidation was allowed. The sentence of 21 months’ imprisonment on the charge of criminal intimidation was reduced to three months. The sentence of 12 months’ imprisonment for the conviction of theft was substituted with a fine of $1,000 and in default thereof, a sentence of two weeks’ imprisonment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
37	PP v Lim Ah Seng: Culpable Homicide & Sentencing Factors in Domestic Abuse Case 06 Jul 2006 Lim Ah Seng (Defendant)Lost	06 Jul 2006	Lim Ah Seng (Defendant): LostAccused sentenced to imprisonment of two years and six months.
38	PP v Leong Siew Chor: Murder, Consent to Death & Admissibility of Statements 18 May 2006 Leong Siew Chor (Defendant)Lost	18 May 2006	Leong Siew Chor (Defendant): Convicted of MurderAccused was found guilty of murder and sentenced to death.
39	PP v Chee Cheong Hin Constance: Sentencing for Kidnapping and Culpable Homicide by Mentally Disordered Offender 06 Apr 2006 Chee Cheong Hin Constance (Defendant)Lost	06 Apr 2006	Chee Cheong Hin Constance (Defendant): LostAccused sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment for culpable homicide and 3 years' imprisonment for kidnapping, to run consecutively. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
40	Took Leng How v PP: Diminished Responsibility & Adverse Inferences in Murder Conviction Appeal 24 Jan 2006 Took Leng How (Appellant)Lost	24 Jan 2006	Took Leng How (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed.
41	PP v Chee Cheong Hin Constance: Culpable Homicide & Kidnapping - Child's Death 23 Jan 2006 Chee Cheong Hin Constance (Defendant)Lost	23 Jan 2006	Chee Cheong Hin Constance (Defendant): ConvictedAccused convicted of kidnapping and culpable homicide.
42	Public Prosecutor v Vijayakumar: Murder, Private Defence & Penal Code Exceptions 29 Nov 2005 Vijayakumar s/o Veeriah (Defendant)Lost	29 Nov 2005	Vijayakumar s/o Veeriah (Defendant): ConvictedAccused was convicted of murder and sentenced to death.
43	PP v Took Leng How: Murder, Diminished Responsibility & Schizophrenia 25 Aug 2005 Took Leng How (Defendant)Lost	25 Aug 2005	Took Leng How (Defendant): Guilty as chargedAccused found guilty as charged and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.
44	Tan Wei Yi v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Grievous Hurt Conviction 11 Jul 2005 Tan Wei Yi (Appellant)Won	11 Jul 2005	Tan Wei Yi (Appellant): Appeal against conviction allowedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction was allowed, and his sentence was quashed.
45	Public Prosecutor v Vanmaichelvan: Drug Trafficking Sentence Appeal 21 Apr 2005 Vanmaichelvan s/o Barsathi (Appellant)Lost	21 Apr 2005	Vanmaichelvan s/o Barsathi (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the sentence of 26 years’ imprisonment with 15 strokes of the cane was dismissed.
46	Purwanti Parji v PP: Life Imprisonment for Culpable Homicide of Elderly Victim by Domestic Worker 14 Feb 2005 Purwanti Parji (Appellant)Lost	14 Feb 2005	Purwanti Parji (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the sentence of life imprisonment was dismissed.
47	PP v Purwanti Parji: Culpable Homicide & Sentencing in Employer-Domestic Worker Relationship 28 Sep 2004 Purwanti Parji (Defendant)Lost	28 Sep 2004	Purwanti Parji (Defendant): Life ImprisonmentAccused sentenced to life imprisonment for culpable homicide (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
48	Chua Tian Bok Timothy v Public Prosecutor: Road Rage, Compounding Offences & Public Interest 15 Sep 2004 Chua Tian Bok Timothy (Petitioner)Lost	15 Sep 2004	Chua Tian Bok Timothy (Petitioner): Petition DismissedThe petition for revision was dismissed, and the case was remitted to the lower court for trial.
49	Chua Siew Lin v PP: Maid Abuse, Criminal Intimidation & Voluntarily Causing Hurt under Penal Code 09 Sep 2004 Chua Siew Lin (Appellant)Partial	09 Sep 2004	Chua Siew Lin (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed, appeal on sentence allowed in partAppeal against conviction dismissed and appeal on sentence allowed in part, with the sentence for DAC 3550/2004 to be reduced from four months’ to two months’ imprisonment.
50	PP v Tan Ping Koon & Chua Ser Lien: Kidnapping for Ransom - Sentencing 08 Sep 2004 Tan Ping Koon (Defendant)Lost	08 Sep 2004	Tan Ping Koon (Defendant): Imprisonment for life and caningSentenced to imprisonment for life and three strokes of the cane.
51	Ong Chin Keat Jeffrey v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Controlled Drugs under the Misuse of Drugs Act 07 Sep 2004 Ong Chin Keat Jeffrey (Appellant)Lost	07 Sep 2004	Ong Chin Keat Jeffrey (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for trafficking in a controlled drug was dismissed.
52	Public Prosecutor v Selvakumar Pillai: Theft by Servant & Admissibility of Confession 25 Aug 2004 Selvakumar Pillai s/o Suppiah Pillai (Respondent)Lost	25 Aug 2004	Selvakumar Pillai s/o Suppiah Pillai (Respondent): Respondent sentenced to two years’ imprisonmentThe respondent was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment.
53	Public Prosecutor v Cheong Hock Lai: Late Trading, Securities Industry Act, and Deterrent Sentencing 14 Jun 2004 Cheong Hock Lai (Respondent)Partial	14 Jun 2004	Cheong Hock Lai (Respondent): Fined $100,000Fined $100,000, in default ten months’ imprisonment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
54	Public Prosecutor v Ng Kwang Lim: Culpable Homicide and Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offender 28 Apr 2004 Ng Kwang Lim (Defendant)Lost	28 Apr 2004	Ng Kwang Lim (Defendant): ConvictedAccused convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment.
55	Yeo Kwan Wee Kenneth v Public Prosecutor: Grievous Hurt & Sentencing Appeal 26 Feb 2004 Yeo Kwan Wee Kenneth (Appellant)Lost	26 Feb 2004	Yeo Kwan Wee Kenneth (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for voluntarily causing grievous hurt was dismissed.
56	Public Prosecutor v AA: Sentencing for Sodomy Offences Involving Minors 19 Jan 2004 AA (Defendant)Lost	19 Jan 2004	AA (Defendant): Defendant sentencedAccused sentenced to a total of three years and nine months imprisonment.
57	Soosainathan v PP: Murder Conviction Upheld Despite Inconsistencies in Evidence 03 Nov 2003 Soosainathan s/o Dass Saminathan (Appellant)Lost	03 Nov 2003	Soosainathan s/o Dass Saminathan (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the conviction for murder was dismissed.
58	Han Yung Ting v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Conviction Appeal Dismissed 29 Oct 2003 Han Yung Ting (Appellant)Lost	29 Oct 2003	Han Yung Ting (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction dismissed.
59	Wong Tiew Yong v PP: Auxiliary Police Officers' Conduct & Sentencing Appeal 27 Aug 2003 Wong Tiew Yong (Appellant)Partial	27 Aug 2003	Wong Tiew Yong (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowedAppeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed. Fine of $500 imposed on each charge (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
60	Public Prosecutor v Dhanabalan: Trafficking of Controlled Drugs 20 Aug 2003 Dhanabalan s/o A Gopalkrishnan (Defense)Lost	20 Aug 2003	Dhanabalan s/o A Gopalkrishnan (Defense): Conviction and SentencingAccused sentenced to 20 years imprisonment for each of the two charges as well as 15 strokes of the cane for each charge. The court ordered the terms of imprisonment to be served concurrently and restricted the maximum number of strokes to 24.
61	Tan Chun Seng v Public Prosecutor: Sudden Fight Defence in Culpable Homicide 05 Jun 2003 Tan Chun Seng (Appellant)Won	05 Jun 2003	Tan Chun Seng (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
62	Public Prosecutor v Chia Moh Heng: Sentencing for Culpable Homicide and Mental Impairment 08 May 2003 Chia Moh Heng (Defendant)Lost	08 May 2003	Chia Moh Heng (Defendant): Sentence of Life ImprisonmentAccused sentenced to life imprisonment with effect from 17 September 2002.
63	PP v Fazely: Complicity, Common Intention & Unlawful Assembly in Murder & Rioting 16 Mar 2003 Khairul Famy bin Mohd Samsudin (Respondent)Lost	16 Mar 2003	Khairul Famy bin Mohd Samsudin (Respondent): Convicted of causing grievous hurtAcquitted of murder but convicted of causing grievous hurt under s 325, read with s 149, of the Penal Code.
64	Vignes v PP: Trafficking, Lack of Knowledge & Abetment of Drug Trafficking 21 Jan 2003 Vignes s/o Mourthi (Appellant)Lost	21 Jan 2003	Vignes s/o Mourthi (Appellant): Appeal DismissedVignes's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
65	Public Prosecutor v Quek Loo Ming: Sentencing Appeal for Culpable Homicide and Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt 07 Nov 2002 Quek Loo Ming (Respondent)Lost	07 Nov 2002	Quek Loo Ming (Respondent): Sentence IncreasedThe respondent's sentence was increased to 10 years imprisonment for the first charge and 5 years for the second charge, to run consecutively.
66	Public Prosecutor v Saminathan: Murder and Robbery Case 31 Oct 2002 Saminathan s/o Subramaniam (Defendant)Lost	31 Oct 2002	Saminathan s/o Subramaniam (Defendant): Imprisonment for life and caningSentenced to imprisonment for life and 6 strokes of the cane for manslaughter, and 5 years imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane for robbery. Terms to run concurrently.
67	Public Prosecutor v Salehudden bin Ibrahim: Culpable Homicide and Mitigation 13 Aug 2002 Salehudden bin Ibrahim (Defense)Lost	13 Aug 2002	Salehudden bin Ibrahim (Defense): ConvictedAccused sentenced to eight years imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane.
68	Public Prosecutor v Quek Loo Ming: Culpable Homicide and Poisoning Case 04 Aug 2002 Quek Loo Ming (Defendant)Lost	04 Aug 2002	Quek Loo Ming (Defendant): ImprisonmentSentenced to 9 years imprisonment for the first charge and 3 years imprisonment for the second charge, to run concurrently.
69	PP v Lam Chen Fong: Criminal Breach of Trust, Corruption, and Confiscation of Benefits 25 Jul 2002 Lam Chen Fong (Defendant)Lost	25 Jul 2002	Lam Chen Fong (Defendant): Conviction and ImprisonmentThe defendant was convicted on multiple charges and sentenced to 22 years imprisonment.
70	Bala Murugan v PP: Trafficking, Abetment, Mens Rea under Misuse of Drugs Act 11 Jul 2002 Bala Murugan a/l Krishnan (Appellant)Lost	11 Jul 2002	Bala Murugan a/l Krishnan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence for drug-related offences was dismissed.
71	PP v Fazely bin Rahmat: Unlawful Assembly, Common Object, and Murder Charge 07 Jul 2002 Khairul Famy bin Mohd Samsudin (Defendant)Lost	07 Jul 2002	Khairul Famy bin Mohd Samsudin (Defendant): Guilty of RiotingFound guilty of rioting under Section 147 of the Penal Code and sentenced to five years imprisonment and twelve strokes of the cane. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
72	Public Prosecutor v Anthony Ler & Z: Abetment to Murder & Murder under Penal Code 04 Dec 2001 Anthony Ler Wee Teang (Defendant)Lost	04 Dec 2001	Anthony Ler Wee Teang (Defendant): Guilty of Abetment to MurderFound guilty of abetting Z to commit murder and sentenced to death.
73	Public Prosecutor v Ong Ker Seng: Criminal Law, Singapore High Court 11 Sep 2001 Ong Ker Seng (Respondent, Appellant)	11 Sep 2001	Ong Ker Seng (Respondent, Appellant): -
74	Public Prosecutor v Ong Ker Seng: Undischarged Bankrupt's Loan & Non-Disclosure 11 Sep 2001 Ong Ker Seng (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	11 Sep 2001	Ong Ker Seng (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissedThe respondent's appeal against conviction was dismissed. The appeal against sentence was allowed.
75	Ashok Kumar Giri v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Cannabis and Statutory Presumptions 02 Sep 2001 Ashok Kumar Giri (Appellant)Lost	02 Sep 2001	Ashok Kumar Giri (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
76	Ramis a/l Muniandy v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Cannabis & Proof of Possession under Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Aug 2001 Ramis a/l Muniandy (Appellant)Lost	02 Aug 2001	Ramis a/l Muniandy (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
77	PP v Tan Siew Lam: Trafficking of Morphine & Knowledge of Drug Possession under Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Aug 2000 Anand Naidu a/l Raman (Defendant)Lost	03 Aug 2000	Anand Naidu a/l Raman (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe 2nd Accused was found guilty as charged and convicted him.
78	Public Prosecutor v Heah Lian Khin: Official Secrets Act Violation & Witness Credibility 31 Jul 2000 Heah Lian Khin (Respondent)Remanded	31 Jul 2000	Heah Lian Khin (Respondent): Charges remitted for further inquiryThe case was remitted to the District Judge for further inquiry.
79	Lau Lee Peng v PP: Grave and Sudden Provocation in Murder Case 10 Mar 2000 Lau Lee Peng (Appellant)Lost	10 Mar 2000	Lau Lee Peng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for murder was dismissed.