Public Prosecutor v Mohamad Najiman: Inciting Physical Attack & Sentencing

In Public Prosecutor v Mohamad Najiman bin Abdull Aziz, the High Court of Singapore, presided over by Justice Choo Han Teck, sentenced Mohamad Najiman to 12 years imprisonment and 10 strokes of the cane on February 25, 2011. The case concerned the accused's role in inciting a physical attack that resulted in a fatality. The court found that the accused played a substantial role in inciting the attack, despite not landing any blows himself. The sentence was determined to be on par with other main assailants.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Accused sentenced to 12 years imprisonment and 10 strokes of the cane.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Mohamad Najiman was sentenced to 12 years imprisonment and 10 strokes of the cane for inciting a fatal physical attack.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyJudgment for ProsecutionWon
Andre Darius Jumabhoy of Deputy Public Prosecutor
Amarjit Singh of Deputy Public Prosecutor
Mohamad Najiman bin Abdull AzizDefendantIndividualSentence imposedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Andre Darius JumabhoyDeputy Public Prosecutor
Amarjit SinghDeputy Public Prosecutor
Noor Mohamed MaricanMarican & Associates

4. Facts

  1. The accused had a substantial role in inciting the physical attack.
  2. Accomplices obeyed the accused in launching and ceasing the attack.
  3. The accused did not land any blow on the deceased.
  4. Other persons were already attacking the deceased.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Mohamad Najiman bin Abdull Aziz, Criminal Case No 13 of 2010, [2011] SGHC 44

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Term of imprisonment commences
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Incitement to commit physical assault
    • Outcome: The court found that the accused played a substantial role in inciting the attack.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Appropriateness of sentence
    • Outcome: The court imposed a sentence of 12 years imprisonment and 10 strokes of the cane.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. No remedies sought

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Incitement
  • Physical attack
  • Accomplices
  • Sentence
  • Cane

15.2 Keywords

  • incitement
  • physical assault
  • criminal law
  • sentencing
  • singapore

17. Areas of Law

Area NameRelevance Score
Criminal Law90
Sentencing80
Criminal Procedure70
Offences60

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing