Lim Chin San Contractors v L W Infrastructure: Setting Aside Arbitrator's Award for Breach of Natural Justice

In Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd v L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd, the Singapore High Court heard an application by Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd to set aside an arbitrator's additional award of pre-award interest to L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd. The court, presided over by Justice Lai Siu Chiu, granted the application, finding that the arbitrator breached the rules of natural justice by failing to provide Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd with an adequate opportunity to be heard before issuing the additional award. The court set aside the additional award, ordering L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd to bear the costs.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Plaintiff's application granted; Additional Award set aside.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court set aside an arbitrator's additional award of pre-award interest due to a breach of natural justice, specifically audi alteram partem.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
L W Infrastructure Pte LtdDefendantCorporationAdditional Award set asideLost
Lim Chin San Contractors Pte LtdPlaintiffCorporationApplication grantedWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Lai Siu ChiuJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The defendant served a Notice of Arbitration on the plaintiff on 22 June 2004.
  2. The arbitrator rendered a Final Award on 29 June 2010, awarding the plaintiff $341,391.10.
  3. The Final Award did not include an award of liquidated damages to the defendant.
  4. The defendant appealed, and the Final Award was remitted to the arbitrator for reconsideration of liquidated damages.
  5. The arbitrator then awarded the defendant $945,000 for liquidated damages in Supplementary Award No 2.
  6. The defendant's solicitor requested pre-award interest, which the arbitrator granted in an Additional Award.
  7. The arbitrator awarded $274,114.61 as pre-award interest to the defendant.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd v L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd, Originating Summons No. 988/2011, [2012] SGHC 75

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Notice of Arbitration served by the defendant on the plaintiff.
Arbitrator rendered his Final Award.
Arbitrator issued a Supplementary Award.
Justice Judith Prakash dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal and substantially allowed the defendant’s appeal.
Arbitrator rendered his Supplementary Award No 2 (Remitted Issues).
Defendant’s solicitor wrote to the Arbitrator with a request for “pre-award interest”.
Arbitrator issued Additional Award.
High Court granted the plaintiff’s application to set aside the Additional Award.
Appeals to this decision in Civil Appeals Nos 17 and 26 of 2012 were dismissed by the Court of Appeal.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Natural Justice
    • Outcome: The court found that the arbitrator breached the rule of audi alteram partem by failing to give the plaintiff an adequate opportunity to be heard before issuing the Additional Award.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to provide adequate notice
      • Failure to provide opportunity to be heard
    • Related Cases:
      • [2007] 3 SLR(R) 86
      • [2010] SGHC 80
  2. Validity of Additional Award under Section 43(4) of the Arbitration Act
    • Outcome: The court found that s 43(4) was not in and of itself a ground upon which the court could declare the Additional Award a nullity and set it aside.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Whether the claim was presented during arbitration proceedings
      • Whether the claim was omitted from the award

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Order to set aside the Additional Award
  2. Declaration that the Additional Award be declared a nullity

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Arbitration
  • Construction Disputes
  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Construction

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
LW Infrastructure Pte Ltd v Lim Chin San Contractors Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2011] 4 SLR 477SingaporeCited as the decision where the Final Award was remitted to the Arbitrator for reconsideration of the issue of liquidated damages.
Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[2007] 3 SLR(R) 86SingaporeCited for the principle of minimal curial intervention in arbitration proceedings and the requirements for establishing a breach of the rules of natural justice.
Panchaud Frères SA v Pagnan and FratelliN/AYes[1974] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 394N/ACited by the defendant for the proposition that arbitral awards can be remitted for reconsideration of interest.
Leong Kum Whay v QBE Insurance (M) Sdn Bhd & OrsN/AYes[2006] 1 MLJ 710MalaysiaCited by the defendant for the proposition that arbitral awards can be remitted for reconsideration of interest.
Front Row Investment Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Daimler South East Asia Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2010] SGHC 80SingaporeCited for the definition of the rule of natural justice known as audi alteram partem.
John Holland Pty Ltd v Toyo Engineering Corp (Japan)N/AYes[2001] 1 SLR(R) 443N/ACited and approved in Soh Beng Tee for the requirements to establish a breach of natural justice.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Arbitration Act (Cap 10, 2002 Rev Ed) s 48(1)(a)(vii)Singapore
Arbitration Act (Cap 10, 2002 Rev Ed) s 43(4)Singapore
Arbitration Act (Cap 10, 2002 Rev Ed) s 43(5)Singapore
Arbitration Act (Cap 10, 2002 Rev Ed) s 47Singapore
Arbitration Act (Cap 10, 2002 Rev Ed) s 44(2)Singapore
Arbitration Act (Cap 10, 2002 Rev Ed) s 48Singapore
Arbitration Act (Cap 10, 2002 Rev Ed) s 48(1)(a)(iv)Singapore
Arbitration Act (Cap 10, 2002 Rev Ed) s 22Singapore
Arbitration Act (Cap 10, 2002 Rev Ed) s 35(2)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Arbitration
  • Arbitration Act
  • Additional Award
  • Pre-award interest
  • Natural justice
  • Audi alteram partem
  • Functus officio
  • Minimal curial intervention

15.2 Keywords

  • arbitration
  • natural justice
  • construction
  • pre-award interest
  • arbitrator
  • award
  • singapore

17. Areas of Law

Area NameRelevance Score
Arbitration95
Administrative Law20
Contract Law15

16. Subjects

  • Arbitration
  • Breach of Natural Justice
  • Construction Dispute