Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd
Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 5 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd has been represented by 5 law firms and 9 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
WongPartnership LLP | 2 cases |
TSMP Law Corporation | 1 case |
Samuel Seow Law Corporation | 2 cases |
Balkenende Chew & Chia | 1 case |
Balkenende Chew and Chia | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 32.0 parties avg |
Partial | 32.0 parties avg |
Won | 32.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2013 | 22.0 parties avg |
2012 | 32.0 parties avg |
2011 | 22.0 parties avg |
2010 | 12.0 parties avg |
2005 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 3(33.3%) |
Partial | 3(33.3%) |
Won | 3(33.3%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 41,340.258 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2013 | 2 11 |
2012 | 3 111 |
2011 | 1 2 |
2010 | 1 1 |
2005 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 9 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
28 Nov 2013 | Defendant | WonApplication dismissed in its entirety with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
17 Jan 2013 | Appellant, Respondent | PartialCompensation assessed at $104,810 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
17 Oct 2012 | Respondent, Plaintiff, Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore. |
14 May 2012 | Plaintiff, Respondent | PartialAppeal partially allowed; cross appeal dismissed. No order as to costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
09 Apr 2012 | Plaintiff | WonPlaintiff's application to set aside the Additional Award was granted with costs fixed at $6,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
04 Jul 2011 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed on the first and second questions of law. The Award was remitted to the Arbitrator for reconsideration. |
04 Jul 2011 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
18 Aug 2010 | Plaintiff | PartialMr. Shiok is to vacate the unit within six weeks of this judgment, failing which he is to pay the plaintiff rent at the rate of $6,400 a month, pro-rated accordingly. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
22 Dec 2005 | Plaintiff | WonJudgment for the sum of $219,912 and to interlocutory judgment for assessment of the value of the work done by it and the damages suffered by it by reason of the wrongful termination of the subcontract (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |