Tan Liam Beng

Tan Liam Beng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 26 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and misrepresentation. Their track record shows a 23.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated expertise across 83 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	25 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 25 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	16 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	16 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Damages	9 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	7 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Force Majeure	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
SIA Conditions of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Repudiation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Acceptance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Compromise Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sand Ban	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ready-Mixed Concrete (RMC)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prolongation Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ready-Mixed Concrete	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of Loss	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Subcontracting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sub-Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Industry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Election or Affirmation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Set-off and Abatement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Suspension of Performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares Transfer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cerebral Palsy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice0% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chinese Drywall	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice0% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Adjudication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Defects	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Liam Beng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Liam Beng has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	14 cases	54% of cases	L W Infrastructure v Lim Chin San: Functus Officio & Arbitration After Award Set Aside(Nov 2013) Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Sand Ban, Frustration of Contract & RMC Supply(Jul 2013) SKK (S) Pte Ltd v Management Corporation: Assessment of Prolongation Costs(Apr 2013)
Drew and Napier LLC	8 cases	31% of cases	CS Bored Pile System v Evan Lim: Formation of Contract & Acceptance in Construction Subcontract(Jan 2006) Jurong Town Corp v Wishing Star Ltd: Misrepresentation & Contract Rescission in Construction Project(May 2005) Permasteelisa v Hyundai: Arbitration Award Recourse & Misconduct Claim(Feb 2005)
Drew & Napier	3 cases	12% of cases	Projection Pte Ltd v The Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd: Settlement Agreement & Insurance Claim Dispute(Apr 2001) Projection Pte Ltd v The Tai Ping Insurance: Contractors' All Risks Policy Dispute(Jul 2000) Jia Chen Construction v. Wei Sin Construction: Subcontract Dispute over Payment and Omitted Works(Apr 2000)
Drew and Napier	1 cases	4% of cases	Chan Hong Seng Engineering v Vatten International: Subcontract Dispute Over Seletar Sewage Treatment Works(Mar 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Liam Beng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 2 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	122.0 parties avg	2.0	46%
Partial	82.4 parties avg	2.4	31%
Won	62.5 parties avg	2.5	23%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	63.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Liam Beng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	12(46%)	46%
Partial	8(31%)	31%
Won	6(23%)	23%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,297,415.36	92,672.5314 cases	14

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	6 222	Lost: 2 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (33.3%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2012	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 26 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	L W Infrastructure v Lim Chin San: Functus Officio & Arbitration After Award Set Aside 28 Nov 2013 L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Nov 2013	L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication dismissed in its entirety with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Sand Ban, Frustration of Contract & RMC Supply 04 Jul 2013 Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	04 Jul 2013	Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedThe defendant's counterclaim for losses due to the plaintiff's breach of contract was allowed; damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	SKK (S) Pte Ltd v Management Corporation: Assessment of Prolongation Costs 10 Apr 2013 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1166 (Defendant)Partial	10 Apr 2013	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1166 (Defendant): Partial JudgmentPartial judgment against the Defendant; required to pay $70,204.50 to the Plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	L W Infrastructure v Lim Chin San: Natural Justice in Arbitration & Additional Awards 17 Oct 2012 L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	17 Oct 2012	L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
5	Lim Chin San Contractors v L W Infrastructure: Setting Aside Arbitrator's Award for Breach of Natural Justice 09 Apr 2012 L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	09 Apr 2012	L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd (Defendant): Additional Award set asideThe Additional Award in favor of the defendant was set aside.
6	SKK (S) Pte Ltd v Management Corporation: Repainting Contract Dispute over Paint Specifications and Payment 25 Sep 2011 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1166 (Defendant)Lost	25 Sep 2011	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1166 (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	LW Infrastructure v Lim Chin San: Liquidated Damages & Sub-Contract Termination 04 Jul 2011 LW Infrastructure Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	04 Jul 2011	LW Infrastructure Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed on the first and second questions of law. The Award was remitted to the Arbitrator for reconsideration.
8	Lim Chin San Contractors v LW Infrastructure: Appeal on Extension of Time and Termination in Construction Sub-Contract 04 Jul 2011 LW Infrastructure Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	04 Jul 2011	LW Infrastructure Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Holcim v Precise Development: Force Majeure & Indonesian Sand Ban Impact on Concrete Supply 18 Jan 2011 Precise Development Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	18 Jan 2011	Precise Development Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Precise Development v Holcim: Dispute over Concrete Supply Contract due to Indonesian Sand Ban 16 Nov 2009 Precise Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	16 Nov 2009	Precise Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Interlocutory judgment for the plaintiffInterlocutory judgment awarded to the plaintiff, with damages to be assessed by the Registrar.
11	Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Damages 08 Apr 2008 Wishing Star Ltd (Appellant)Partial	08 Apr 2008	Wishing Star Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part with regard to the award which the Judge made for damages claimed under item (a).
12	Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Assessment of Damages for Misrepresentation in Façade Work Contract 13 Aug 2007 Wishing Star Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Aug 2007	Wishing Star Ltd (Plaintiff): Counterclaims DismissedPlaintiff's claims for work done and services rendered as well as for breach of copyright are dismissed.
13	CS Bored Pile System v Evan Lim: Formation of Contract & Acceptance in Construction Subcontract 19 Jan 2006 Evan Lim & Co Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	19 Jan 2006	Evan Lim & Co Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant with damages to be assessed. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
14	Jurong Town Corp v Wishing Star Ltd: Misrepresentation & Contract Rescission in Construction Project 12 May 2005 Wishing Star Ltd (Respondent)Lost	12 May 2005	Wishing Star Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; contract validly terminated; ordered to pay damages to JTC (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Permasteelisa v Hyundai: Arbitration Award Recourse & Misconduct Claim 14 Feb 2005 Hyundai Engineering and Construction Co Ltd (Respondent)Partial	14 Feb 2005	Hyundai Engineering and Construction Co Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissed in partCertain matters remitted to the arbitrator for reconsideration.
16	Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Misrepresentation, Contract Breach & Damages 21 Nov 2004 Wishing Star Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Nov 2004	Wishing Star Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court found that the defendant was not induced into the contract by any of the representations that had been found to be untrue, and further, that in the event, the defendant had, by its conduct, elected to affirm the contract after it had full notice of the facts and its rights in law.
17	Chan Hong Seng v Vatten: Assessment of Damages for Wrongful Repudiation 25 Oct 2004 Chan Hong Seng Engineering and Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	25 Oct 2004	Chan Hong Seng Engineering and Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part. The parties must recalculate the damages in accordance with the court's findings.
18	Prosperland v Civic Construction: Defective Condominium & Limitation Act 28 Jul 2004 D. Exodus Architects & Planners Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	28 Jul 2004	D. Exodus Architects & Planners Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial JudgmentClaim for damages regarding external tiles is not time-barred; claim for glass blocks is time-barred.
19	Jia Min Building Construction v Ann Lee: Sub-Contract Termination & Payment Dispute 24 May 2004 Jia Min Building Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	24 May 2004	Jia Min Building Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed, and judgment was entered for the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Chan Hong Seng Engineering v Vatten International: Subcontract Dispute Over Seletar Sewage Treatment Works 23 Mar 2004 Chan Hong Seng Engineering and Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Mar 2004	Chan Hong Seng Engineering and Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Damages payable to Vatten International Pte LtdChan Hong Seng Engineering and Construction Pte Ltd was ordered to pay Vatten International Pte Ltd $84,371.06. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	SIS Technologies v Chan Beng Wai: Indemnity, Share Transfer & Contract Formation 30 Jan 2004 Chan Beng Wai (Defendant)Won	30 Jan 2004	Chan Beng Wai (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs.
22	Vatten International Pte Ltd v Chan Hong Seng: Stay of Appeal Due to Unpaid Costs 16 Jan 2003 Chan Hong Seng Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	16 Jan 2003	Chan Hong Seng Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal stayedChan Hong Seng Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd's appeal was stayed due to failure to pay costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
23	Mero Asia Pacific v Takenaka Corp: Review of Taxation of Costs for Adjourned Arbitration Hearing 29 Sep 2002 Mero Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Claimant)Partial	29 Sep 2002	Mero Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Claimant): Costs reducedCosts awarded were reduced following the review of taxation of costs.
24	Projection Pte Ltd v The Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd: Settlement Agreement & Insurance Claim Dispute 18 Apr 2001 Projection Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	18 Apr 2001	Projection Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; judgment for the appellant in the sum of $553,560.98 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
25	Projection Pte Ltd v The Tai Ping Insurance: Contractors' All Risks Policy Dispute 20 Jul 2000 Projection Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Jul 2000	Projection Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs' claim was dismissed with costs to the defendants.
26	Jia Chen Construction v. Wei Sin Construction: Subcontract Dispute over Payment and Omitted Works 27 Apr 2000 Jia Chen Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	27 Apr 2000	Jia Chen Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for the PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff for value of work done and not paid for, loss of profits on the omitted works, and the retention sum (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).