WongPartnership LLP v Chiam Heng Hsien: Taxation of Legal Costs Dispute

In WongPartnership LLP v Chiam Heng Hsien, the High Court of Singapore reviewed the assistant registrar's taxation of legal costs claimed by WongPartnership LLP against Chiam Heng Hsien and Mitre for work done in relation to a property ownership dispute. The court dismissed the defendants' applications for review, upholding the assistant registrar's decisions on both bills of costs.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

The court upheld the assistant registrar's decisions on both bills of costs, dismissing the defendants' applications for review.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court reviews the taxation of legal costs in a dispute between WongPartnership LLP and its clients, Chiam Heng Hsien, concerning work related to a property ownership dispute.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
WongPartnership LLPPlaintiffLimited Liability PartnershipJudgment for PlaintiffWon
CHIAM HENG HSIENDefendantIndividualApplication DismissedLost
MitreDefendantOtherApplication DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Lee Seiu KinJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. WongPartnership LLP represented Chiam Heng Hsien and Mitre in a property ownership dispute.
  2. The representation was pursuant to a warrant to act executed on 21 June 2006.
  3. The plaintiff rendered interim invoices, which were paid, except for Invoice 75031 and Invoice 097005.
  4. The defendants paid Invoice 75031 by instalment until December 2007, leaving a balance of $50,401.13.
  5. The plaintiff issued Invoice 097005 for $171,885.63 on 18 December 2009.
  6. The plaintiff sought leave of court for taxation of the unpaid bills.
  7. The assistant registrar taxed BC178 as drawn and taxed down Section 1 of BC179 from $155,631.50 to $125,000.

5. Formal Citations

  1. WongPartnership LLP v Chiam Heng Hsien and another and other matters, , [2013] SGHC 247

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Warrant to act executed by the defendants
Invoice number 75031 issued
Defendants paid Invoice 75031 by instalment until December 2007
Court of Appeal heard and disposed of CA54/2007, CA116/2007, CA117/2007 and CA128/2007
Mr Chiam lodged a complaint to the Law Society against Mr Andre Francis Maniam and Ms Koh Swee Yen
IC55/2008 published its report
Plaintiff was granted a discharge from acting as solicitors for the defendants
Mr Chiam lodged another complaint with TLS against the Solicitors
Invoice 097005 issued
Plaintiff sent a letter requesting payment of the two invoices
Plaintiff wrote to the defendants to seek their consent to taxation
Plaintiff filed originating summons no 275 of 2010 to seek leave of court for taxation
Court granted leave for taxation
Plaintiff filed bill of costs no 178 of 2010 and bill of costs no 179 of 2010
IC18/2010 published its report
Defendants applied for review of the two bills
Hearing for summonses no 5901 of 2012 and 5902 of 2012
Court dismissed the defendants’ applications

7. Legal Issues

  1. Taxation of Legal Costs
    • Outcome: The court upheld the assistant registrar's decisions on the bills of costs.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Taxation of Legal Costs

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Litigation

11. Industries

  • Legal

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2009 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Taxation
  • Bill of costs
  • Legal costs
  • Indemnity basis

15.2 Keywords

  • Legal costs
  • Taxation
  • WongPartnership
  • Chiam Heng Hsien
  • Mitre
  • Singapore
  • High Court

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Legal Profession
  • Costs