CHIAM HENG HSIEN

CHIAM HENG HSIEN is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 2 law firms. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 57.1% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

CHIAM HENG HSIEN has been represented by 2 law firms and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Wong Partnership	1 case	Koh Swee Yen Andre Maniam
Eldan Law LLP	2 cases	Edwin Lee Peng Khoon Jin Shan Fu Xianglin Lesley

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of CHIAM HENG HSIEN's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 4 (57.1%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	65.0 parties avg	5.0	85.7%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	14.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2013	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	113.0 parties avg	13.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of CHIAM HENG HSIEN's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(85.7%)	85.7%
Partial	1(14.3%)	14.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	9,000.00	1,500.006 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 3	Lost: 3 cases (300.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2015-sghc-233 07 Sep 2015	07 Sep 2015	Appellant, Plaintiff	LostAppeal against the decision of the learned Assistant Registrar striking out the plaintiffs’ statement of claim and dismissing the action was dismissed with costs fixed at $5,000 plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2015-sgca-27 21 May 2015	21 May 2015	Appellant	PartialAppeal allowed in part; the Judge’s decision below that the 1st and 2nd Respondents are partners of MHP is reversed. However, the decision that the 3rd and 4th Respondents are partners of MHP is affirmed. The parties’ respective shares in MHP is as follows: (a) The Appellant: 21/61 (b) The 3rd Respondent: 21/61 (c) The 4th Respondent: 19/61. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2014-sghc-119 25 Jun 2014	25 Jun 2014	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's claim for the entire sale proceeds was dismissed.
4	2013-sghc-247 13 Nov 2013	13 Nov 2013	Defendant	LostThe defendants' applications for review of the bills of costs were dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2013-sghc-35 12 Feb 2013	12 Feb 2013	Plaintiff	LostClaims against the first, second, and third defendants were struck off.
6	2013-sghc-24 24 Jan 2013	24 Jan 2013	Plaintiff	LostApplication dismissed with costs fixed at $4,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	2007-sghc-132 20 Aug 2007	20 Aug 2007	Defendant	LostDefense against the order for sale of property with vacant possession dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).