Han Kim Hwa v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking - Misuse of Drugs Act
Han Kim Hwa appealed to the High Court of Singapore against his conviction and sentence on four charges under the Misuse of Drugs Act for possession of drugs for the purpose of trafficking. The High Court, presided over by Justice Choo Han Teck, dismissed the appeals against both conviction and sentence, finding that the trial judge was justified in rejecting the appellant's claim that the drugs were for personal consumption and that the sentences were not manifestly excessive, especially considering the appellant was not a first-time offender and had committed offenses while on bail. The judgment was delivered on 2013-01-30.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Appeals against conviction and sentence were dismissed.
1.3 Case Type
Criminal
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Han Kim Hwa appeals against conviction and sentence for drug trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act. The High Court dismisses the appeal, finding no manifest excessiveness in the sentence.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Prosecutor | Respondent | Government Agency | Judgment Upheld | Won | Ramu Miyapan of Attorney-General’s Chambers |
Han Kim Hwa | Appellant | Individual | Appeal Dismissed | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | J | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Ramu Miyapan | Attorney-General’s Chambers |
Ramesh Tiwary | Ramesh Tiwary |
4. Facts
- The appellant was convicted on four charges under the Misuse of Drugs Act for possession of drugs for the purpose of trafficking.
- The trial lasted 16 days.
- The appellant pleaded guilty to five other charges and agreed to have 12 others taken into account for sentencing.
- The appellant claimed the drugs were for his own consumption.
- The trial judge rejected the appellant's claim that all the drugs were for his own consumption.
- The appellant had committed some of the offences while out on bail.
5. Formal Citations
- Han Kim Hwa v Public Prosecutor, , [2013] SGHC 29
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Judgment issued |
7. Legal Issues
- Possession of Drugs for Trafficking
- Outcome: The court upheld the conviction, finding the trial judge justified in rejecting the appellant's claim that the drugs were for personal consumption.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Defence of consumption
- Rejection of accused's claim
- Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome: The court dismissed the appeal against the sentence, finding it not manifestly excessive given the appellant's prior offenses and commission of offenses while on bail.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Manifestly excessive sentence
- First offender status
8. Remedies Sought
- Setting aside convictions
- Reduction of sentence
9. Cause of Actions
- Possession of Drugs for the Purpose of Trafficking
10. Practice Areas
- Criminal Litigation
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Misuse of Drugs Act | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Misuse of Drugs Act
- Drug trafficking
- Possession of drugs
- Diamorphine
- Nimetazepan
- Ecstasy
- Methamphetamine
- Defence of consumption
- Manifestly excessive
15.2 Keywords
- drug trafficking
- misuse of drugs act
- criminal appeal
- singapore
- high court
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Misuse of Drugs Act | 95 |
Criminal Law | 70 |
Sentencing | 60 |
Criminal Revision | 50 |
Evidence | 30 |
16. Subjects
- Criminal Law
- Drug Offences