Ramesh Tiwary

Ramesh Tiwary is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 35 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 8 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 9% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated expertise across 72 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	30 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 30 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	26 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 26 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	22 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 22 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	17 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	14 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bail	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Hurt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inadequate Legal Assistance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deficient Legal Services	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Settlement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Irregularities in proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defective consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Curative powers of court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Procedural fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private Prosecution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Primary School Admission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Precedents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Order Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prison Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Harbouring	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Qualified Pleas of Guilt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confessions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Import and Export Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lobbying	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Obstructing the Course of Justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Obstruction of Justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice2% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Privacy Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Show cause action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ramesh Tiwary has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ramesh Tiwary has been affiliated with 8 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 16 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ramesh Tiwary	16 cases	46% of cases	Mao Xuezhong v Public Prosecutor: Workplace Safety, Negligence, and Sentencing Under WSHA(May 2020) PP v Poopathi Chinaiyah: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2020) PP v Mohamed Ansari & Murugesan: Voluntariness of Statements in Drug Trafficking Case(Nov 2019)
Leo Fernando	6 cases	17% of cases	Public Prosecutor v R Sekhar: Undischarged Bankrupt, Obtaining Credit, Bankruptcy Act(Jun 2003) Toh Lam Seng v Public Prosecutor: Plea of Guilt, Mitigation, and Sentencing Appeal in Voluntarily Causing Hurt Case(Apr 2003) Heng Aik Peng v PP: Aiding Drug Importation via Conspiracy & Witness Credibility(Jul 2002)
M/S Ramesh Tiwary	5 cases	14% of cases	PP v Parthiban Kanapathy: Drug Importation, Chain of Custody, Statement Accuracy(Sep 2019) Public Prosecutor v Mangalagiri Dhruva Kumar: Drug Trafficking, Retraction of Guilty Plea(Mar 2018) Pang Siew Fum v PP: Drug Trafficking - Knowledge of Diamorphine Possession(Feb 2011)
Edmond Pereira and Partners	3 cases	9% of cases	Law Society of Singapore v Chen Kok Siang Joseph: Misconduct by Advocate & Solicitor(Sep 2005) Law Society v Ong Ying Ping: Misconduct of Advocate and Solicitor in Prison Visit(Jul 2005) Md Anverdeen Basheer Ahmed v PP: Rioting with Deadly Weapons & Criminal Intimidation(Oct 2004)
Ramesh Tiwary Advocates & Solicitors	2 cases	6% of cases	GHA v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Aggravated Outrage of Modesty(Jul 2024) Public Prosecutor v Yogeswaran Wairan: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2021)
Messrs Ramesh Tiwary	1 cases	3% of cases	Koh Jing Kwang v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Grievous Hurt Conviction(Oct 2014)
Ramesh Tiwary & Co	1 cases	3% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Pang Siew Fum: Trafficking of Diamorphine(Feb 2010)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	3% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Haridass: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine & Inadequate Legal Assistance(Nov 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ramesh Tiwary's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 3 (9%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	262.5 parties avg	2.5	74%
Partial	32.7 parties avg	2.7	9%
Unknown	13.0 parties avg	3.0	3%
Won	52.7 parties avg	2.7	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	43.2 parties avg	3.2
2011	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2013	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2014	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2015	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ramesh Tiwary's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	26(74%)	74%
Partial	3(9%)	9%
Unknown	1(3%)	3%
Won	5(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,000.00	833.336 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Unknown: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 35 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	GHA v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Aggravated Outrage of Modesty 21 Jul 2024 GHA (Appellant)Lost	21 Jul 2024	GHA (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction was dismissed.
2	Public Prosecutor v Haridass: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine & Inadequate Legal Assistance 15 Nov 2022 Babu s/o Suppiah (Other)	15 Nov 2022	Babu s/o Suppiah (Other): -
3	Public Prosecutor v Yogeswaran Wairan: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Apr 2021 Yogeswaran Wairan (Defendant)Lost	20 Apr 2021	Yogeswaran Wairan (Defendant): Accused SentencedAccused sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment and the mandatory 15 strokes of the cane.
4	Mao Xuezhong v Public Prosecutor: Workplace Safety, Negligence, and Sentencing Under WSHA 19 May 2020 Mao Xuezhong (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	19 May 2020	Mao Xuezhong (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal against conviction dismissedMao Xuezhong's appeal against his conviction was dismissed.
5	PP v Poopathi Chinaiyah: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Feb 2020 Poopathi Chinaiyah s/o Paliandi (Defendant)Lost	18 Feb 2020	Poopathi Chinaiyah s/o Paliandi (Defendant): Guilty Plea AcceptedSentenced to 30 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
6	PP v Mohamed Ansari & Murugesan: Voluntariness of Statements in Drug Trafficking Case 13 Nov 2019 Mohamed Ansari bin Mohamed Abdul Aziz (Defendant)Partial	13 Nov 2019	Mohamed Ansari bin Mohamed Abdul Aziz (Defendant): Statements inadmissible in partSome of the defendant's statements were ruled inadmissible.
7	BLV v Public Prosecutor: Sexual Assault, Abuse of Process & Sentencing 07 Nov 2019 BLV (Appellant)Lost	07 Nov 2019	BLV (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed; sentence enhanced for abuse of process.
8	PP v Parthiban Kanapathy: Drug Importation, Chain of Custody, Statement Accuracy 23 Sep 2019 Parthiban Kanapathy (Defendant)Lost	23 Sep 2019	Parthiban Kanapathy (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted of importing not less than 14.99g of diamorphine.
9	PP v Ravan: Misuse of Drugs Act Sentencing for Cannabis Trafficking 25 Apr 2018 Ravan s/o Samubil (Defendant)Lost	25 Apr 2018	Ravan s/o Samubil (Defendant): Guilty plea entered; sentenced to 24½ years of imprisonment and 15 strokes of the caneRavan was convicted of abetting by intentionally aiding Ilango to weigh and cut the original three blocks containing the cannabis, which he knew Ilango possessed for the purpose of trafficking without authorisation.
10	Public Prosecutor v Mangalagiri Dhruva Kumar: Drug Trafficking, Retraction of Guilty Plea 20 Mar 2018 Mangalagiri Dhruva Kumar (Defendant)Lost	20 Mar 2018	Mangalagiri Dhruva Kumar (Defendant): Application to retract plea of guilt dismissed; sentenced to 26 years’ imprisonment with 15 strokes of the cane.The defendant's application to retract his guilty plea was dismissed, and he was sentenced to 26 years’ imprisonment with 15 strokes of the cane.
11	Public Prosecutor v Alagesan Nathan: Drug Trafficking - Mandatory Minimum Sentence 02 Apr 2017 Alagesan Nathan (Defendant)Lost	02 Apr 2017	Alagesan Nathan (Defendant): Mandatory minimum sentence imposedAlagesan Nathan was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
12	Micheal Anak Garing v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction and Sentencing Appeal 26 Feb 2017 MICHEAL ANAK GARING (Appellant)Lost	26 Feb 2017	MICHEAL ANAK GARING (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
13	Mohd Suief v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking, Common Intention, Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Jan 2016 Mohd Suief bin Ismail (Appellant)Lost	25 Jan 2016	Mohd Suief bin Ismail (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
14	Wong Yi Hao Henry v Public Prosecutor: False Information for Primary School Admission 27 Aug 2015 Wong Yi Hao Henry (Appellant)Won	27 Aug 2015	Wong Yi Hao Henry (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe imprisonment sentence was set aside and substituted with a fine of $5,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Public Prosecutor v Micheal Anak Garing: Sentencing for Murder with Common Intention 19 Apr 2015 MICHEAL ANAK GARING (Defendant)Lost	19 Apr 2015	MICHEAL ANAK GARING (Defendant): LostSentenced to death.
16	Koh Jing Kwang v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Grievous Hurt Conviction 26 Oct 2014 Koh Jing Kwang (Appellant)Partial	26 Oct 2014	Koh Jing Kwang (Appellant): Conviction AmendedConviction for voluntarily causing grievous hurt was set aside, and the charge was amended to voluntarily causing hurt.
17	Public Prosecutor v Micheal Anak Garing: Joint Intention in Fatal Robbery 19 Jan 2014 MICHEAL ANAK GARING (Defendant)Lost	19 Jan 2014	MICHEAL ANAK GARING (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty as charged and convicted accordingly.
18	PP v Abdul Haleem & Muhammad Ridzuan: Trafficking in Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 19 May 2013 Abdul Haleem bin Abdul Karim (Defendant)Partial	19 May 2013	Abdul Haleem bin Abdul Karim (Defendant): PartialConvicted on both charges; sentenced to life imprisonment and caning for the first charge, and imprisonment and caning for the second charge.
19	Han Kim Hwa v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking - Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Jan 2013 Han Kim Hwa (Appellant)Lost	29 Jan 2013	Han Kim Hwa (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
20	Mohamed Hisham v PP: Interpretation of Criminal Procedure Code on Bail for Drug & Moneylending Offences 17 Aug 2011 Mohamed Hisham bin Sapandi (Applicant)Won	17 Aug 2011	Mohamed Hisham bin Sapandi (Applicant): Bail GrantedBail was granted to the applicant.
21	Pang Siew Fum v PP: Drug Trafficking - Knowledge of Diamorphine Possession 21 Feb 2011 Cheong Chun Yin (Appellant)Lost	21 Feb 2011	Cheong Chun Yin (Appellant): Appeal DismissedCheong Chun Yin's appeal against his conviction and sentence for drug trafficking was dismissed.
22	Thrumoorthy v Public Prosecutor: Drink Driving & Mitigating Factors in Sentencing 04 Aug 2010 Thrumoorthy s/o Ganapathi Pillai (Appellant)Lost	04 Aug 2010	Thrumoorthy s/o Ganapathi Pillai (Appellant): Appeal against sentence dismissedThe appeal against the two-year disqualification sentence was dismissed.
23	PP v Lim Boon Hiong: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Common Intention 20 Jul 2010 Lim Boon Hiong (Defendant)Lost	20 Jul 2010	Lim Boon Hiong (Defendant): ConvictedLim Boon Hiong was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.
24	Public Prosecutor v Azman: Drug Trafficking - Misuse of Drugs Act 08 Jul 2010 Balasubramaniam s/o Murugesan (Defendant)Won	08 Jul 2010	Balasubramaniam s/o Murugesan (Defendant): AcquittedThird accused acquitted.
25	Public Prosecutor v Pang Siew Fum: Trafficking of Diamorphine 03 Feb 2010 Cheong Chun Yin (Defendant)Lost	03 Feb 2010	Cheong Chun Yin (Defendant): ConvictedFound guilty of drug trafficking and sentenced to death.
26	PP v ACI: Attempted Culpable Homicide & Grievous Hurt - Sentencing 28 Oct 2009 ACI (Defendant)Lost	28 Oct 2009	ACI (Defendant): Sentenced to imprisonmentThe accused was sentenced to five years' imprisonment for attempted culpable homicide and voluntarily causing grievous hurt.
27	Law Society of Singapore v Chen Kok Siang Joseph: Misconduct by Advocate & Solicitor 25 Sep 2005 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	25 Sep 2005	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): WonThe Law Society's application was granted, and the respondent was suspended from practice for four years and ordered to pay costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	Law Society v Ong Ying Ping: Misconduct of Advocate and Solicitor in Prison Visit 14 Jul 2005 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	14 Jul 2005	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application GrantedThe Law Society's application to show cause was granted, and the respondent was suspended from practice for two years. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
29	Md Anverdeen Basheer Ahmed v PP: Rioting with Deadly Weapons & Criminal Intimidation 17 Oct 2004 Md Anverdeen Basheer Ahmed (Appellant)Lost	17 Oct 2004	Md Anverdeen Basheer Ahmed (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence for rioting whilst armed with deadly weapon and disorderly behaviour was dismissed.
30	Public Prosecutor v R Sekhar: Undischarged Bankrupt, Obtaining Credit, Bankruptcy Act 01 Jun 2003 R Sekhar s/o R G Van (Respondent)Lost	01 Jun 2003	R Sekhar s/o R G Van (Respondent): ConvictedR Sekhar was convicted of obtaining credit without disclosing his bankruptcy status.
31	Toh Lam Seng v Public Prosecutor: Plea of Guilt, Mitigation, and Sentencing Appeal in Voluntarily Causing Hurt Case 29 Apr 2003 Toh Lam Seng (Petitioner, Appellant)Lost	29 Apr 2003	Toh Lam Seng (Petitioner, Appellant): Petition and Appeal dismissedThe petitioner's petition to quash his conviction and his appeal against his sentence were both dismissed.
32	Heng Aik Peng v PP: Aiding Drug Importation via Conspiracy & Witness Credibility 17 Jul 2002 Heng Aik Peng (Appellant)Lost	17 Jul 2002	Heng Aik Peng (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
33	Kwan Peng Hong v PP: Outrage of Modesty, Criminal Force & Evidence in Sexual Offence Cases 10 Aug 2000 Kwan Peng Hong (Appellant)Lost	10 Aug 2000	Kwan Peng Hong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. No monetary amount was specified.
34	Public Prosecutor v Tay Beng Guan Albert: Intrusion of Privacy & Sentencing 31 Jul 2000 Tay Beng Guan Albert (Respondent)Lost	31 Jul 2000	Tay Beng Guan Albert (Respondent): Sentence EnhancedThe respondent's sentence was enhanced to one month's imprisonment on each charge, to run consecutively, in addition to the fine imposed by the magistrate.
35	P Shanmugam v PP: Harbouring & Employing Immigration Offenders - Consecutive Sentences & Statutory Interpretation 09 Apr 2000 P Shanmugam (Appellant)Lost	09 Apr 2000	P Shanmugam (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the sentence was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).