Lee Kim Kwong v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct in Caesarean Section

Dr. Lee Kim Kwong appealed against the Disciplinary Committee's (DC) decision finding him guilty of professional misconduct for commencing a caesarean section on a patient without ensuring the anaesthesia had taken full effect. The High Court dismissed the appeal against conviction but allowed the appeal against the sentence, reducing the suspension period from nine to five months. The court found that Dr. Lee had a primary obligation to ensure the effectiveness of the anaesthesia and that his actions constituted serious negligence.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part; period of suspension reduced from nine to five months.

1.3 Case Type

Regulatory

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Medical practitioner Lee Kim Kwong appealed against a professional misconduct charge for commencing a caesarean section without ensuring anesthesia effectiveness. Appeal dismissed, suspension reduced.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Lee Kim KwongAppellantIndividualAppeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in partPartialLek Siang Pheng, Lim Xiu Zhen, Ang Yi Rong
Singapore Medical CouncilRespondentStatutory BoardAppeal against conviction upheld; appeal against sentence partially upheldPartialTan Chee Meng, Chang Man Phing, Ng Shu Ping, Jocelyn Ngiam

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Sundaresh MenonChief JusticeNo
Andrew Phang Boon LeongJustice of the Court of AppealYes
Quentin LohJudgeNo

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Lek Siang PhengRodyk & Davidson LLP
Lim Xiu ZhenRodyk & Davidson LLP
Ang Yi RongRodyk & Davidson LLP
Tan Chee MengWongPartnership LLP
Chang Man PhingWongPartnership LLP
Ng Shu PingWongPartnership LLP
Jocelyn NgiamWongPartnership LLP

4. Facts

  1. The Appellant, a registered medical practitioner, performed a caesarean section on the Complainant.
  2. The Complainant expressed pain during the procedure.
  3. The Appellant commenced the procedure without ensuring the anaesthesia had taken full effect.
  4. The Disciplinary Committee found the Appellant guilty of professional misconduct.
  5. The Appellant sought to set aside the Disciplinary Committee's order.
  6. The High Court dismissed the appeal against conviction but reduced the period of suspension.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Lee Kim Kwong v Singapore Medical Council, Originating Summons No 1177 of 2013, [2014] SGHC 151
  2. Low Cze Hong v Singapore Medical Council, , [2008] 3 SLR(R) 612
  3. Gan Keng Seng Eric v Singapore Medical Council, , [2011] 1 SLR 745

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Complainant first saw the Appellant for management of her first pregnancy.
Appellant safely delivered Complainant's first child via lower segment caesarean section.
Appellant performed a lower segment caesarean section on the Complainant.
Complainant was administered with an epidural injection of local anaesthetic.
Originating Summons No 1177 of 2013 filed.
High Court dismissed the appeal against conviction but allowed the appeal against the sentence.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Professional Misconduct
    • Outcome: The court found the Appellant guilty of professional misconduct under the second limb of the Low Cze Hong test, citing serious negligence.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to ensure anaesthesia effectiveness
      • Departure from accepted medical standards
      • Serious negligence

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Setting aside the Disciplinary Committee's order
  2. Reduction of the suspension period

9. Cause of Actions

  • Professional Misconduct

10. Practice Areas

  • Disciplinary Proceedings
  • Medical Negligence

11. Industries

  • Healthcare

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Low Cze Hong v Singapore Medical CouncilHigh CourtYes[2008] 3 SLR(R) 612SingaporeCited for the definition of professional misconduct, specifically the two limbs: intentional departure from standards and serious negligence.
Gan Keng Seng Eric v Singapore Medical CouncilHigh CourtYes[2011] 1 SLR 745SingaporeCited as a sentencing precedent for professional misconduct involving wilful neglect and gross mismanagement of post-operative treatment.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Medical Registration Act (Cap. 174)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Caesarean section
  • Professional misconduct
  • Epidural anaesthesia
  • Disciplinary Committee
  • Medical Registration Act
  • Standards of professional conduct

15.2 Keywords

  • medical
  • professional misconduct
  • Singapore Medical Council
  • caesarean section
  • anaesthesia
  • negligence

16. Subjects

  • Medical Disciplinary Proceedings
  • Medical Negligence
  • Professional Ethics

17. Areas of Law

  • Medical Law
  • Regulatory Law
  • Professional Misconduct