Koh Jing Kwang v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Grievous Hurt Conviction

Koh Jing Kwang appealed to the High Court of Singapore against his conviction in District Court for voluntarily causing grievous hurt to Chua Bin Huang. The High Court, with See Kee Oon JC presiding on 27 October 2014, allowed the appeal in part, finding insufficient evidence to prove the mens rea for grievous hurt. The charge was amended to voluntarily causing hurt, and Koh Jing Kwang was sentenced to twelve weeks' imprisonment.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Allowed in Part

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Koh Jing Kwang appeals against his conviction for voluntarily causing grievous hurt. The High Court allowed the appeal, amending the charge to voluntarily causing hurt and reducing the sentence.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyAppeal Allowed in PartPartial
James Chew of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Yang Ziliang of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Dwayne Lum of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Koh Jing KwangAppellantIndividualConviction AmendedPartial

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
See Kee OonJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
James ChewAttorney-General’s Chambers
Yang ZiliangAttorney-General’s Chambers
Dwayne LumAttorney-General’s Chambers
Ramesh TiwaryMessrs Ramesh Tiwary

4. Facts

  1. The appellant and his friends were at Shanghai Dolly.
  2. Quek, a friend of the appellant, got into a fight with the victim outside the club.
  3. The appellant ran towards the victim and punched him in the face.
  4. The victim fell backwards, tripped on a kerb, and landed on the road motionless.
  5. The victim suffered a fracture to the skull.
  6. The appellant claimed he merely pushed the victim to separate him from Quek.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Koh Jing Kwang v Public Prosecutor, Magistrate's Appeal No 221 of 2013, [2014] SGHC 213
  2. Public Prosecutor v Koh Jing Kwang, , [2014] SGDC 56

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Appellant punched Chua Bin Huang outside Shanghai Dolly.
Appeal heard before See Kee Oon JC.
Judgment delivered by See Kee Oon JC.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt
    • Outcome: The High Court found that the appellant did not possess the requisite knowledge or intention to sustain a charge under Section 325 of the Penal Code for voluntarily causing grievous hurt.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Mens Rea
      • Intention
      • Knowledge
    • Related Cases:
      • [2005] SGHC 142
      • [2000] 3 SLR(R) 155
  2. Right of Private Defence
    • Outcome: The High Court found that the appellant exceeded the right of private defence by punching the victim in the face, as the harm caused was not reasonably necessary in the circumstances.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Reasonable Apprehension of Danger
      • Excessive Force

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Appeal against conviction
  2. Appeal against sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Voluntarily Causing Hurt
  • Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Appeals
  • Assault and Battery

11. Industries

  • Legal Services

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Public Prosecutor v Koh Jing KwangDistrict CourtYes[2014] SGDC 56SingaporeThe District Court's decision that the appellant was guilty of voluntarily causing grievous hurt was appealed.
Sarjit Singh Rapati v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2005] 1 SLR(R) 638SingaporeCited regarding the purpose and interpretation of a First Information Report (FIR).
Chang Yam Song v PPHigh CourtYes[2005] SGHC 142SingaporeCited for the principle that intention or knowledge must be judged by the actions of the accused, but the High Court declined to adopt the standard of knowledge laid down in this case.
Sim Yew Thong v Ng Loy Nam ThomasHigh CourtYes[2000] 3 SLR(R) 155SingaporeCited for the principle that knowledge encompasses recklessness and negligence, but the High Court declined to adopt this standard of knowledge.
ADF v Public Prosecutor and another appealCourt of AppealYes[2010] 1 SLR 874SingaporeCited for the principle that an appellate court will be slow to overturn findings of fact made by the trial judge.
Tan Chor Jin v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2008] 4 SLR(R) 306SingaporeCited regarding whether an aggressor can avail himself of the right of private defence.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) Section 325Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) Section 322Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) Section 323Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) Section 39Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) Section 338Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Voluntarily causing grievous hurt
  • Voluntarily causing hurt
  • Mens rea
  • Right of private defence
  • First Information Report
  • Fracture
  • Intention
  • Knowledge

15.2 Keywords

  • Grievous Hurt
  • Assault
  • Penal Code
  • Singapore
  • Criminal Law
  • Appeal

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Assault
  • Mens Rea