Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Freezing Order for Asset Dissipation
In Parakou Shipping Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Liu Cheng Chan and others, the Singapore High Court granted the plaintiff's application for a freezing order against the defendants. The plaintiff, a shipping company in liquidation, sought the order to prevent the defendants from dissipating assets to avoid paying an arbitration award to Galsworthy Singapore Pte Ltd. The court, presided over by Justice Choo Han Teck, found that the defendants' actions indicated an intention to prevent Galsworthy from receiving payment and allowed the application, with costs in the cause.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Plaintiff's application allowed.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
The High Court granted a freezing order against the defendants, finding a risk of asset dissipation to prevent payment of an arbitration award.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Others | Defendant | Corporation | Application granted | Lost | |
PARAKOU SHIPPING PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) | Plaintiff | Corporation | Application allowed | Won | |
LIU CHENG CHAN | Defendant | Individual | Application granted | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Parakou Shipping Pte Ltd went into liquidation.
- Galsworthy Singapore Pte Ltd is a major creditor of Parakou Shipping.
- Galsworthy obtained an arbitration award of US$45m against Parakou Shipping.
- The plaintiff applied for a freezing order against the defendants.
- A sum of $635,000 from the sale of the plaintiff’s vessels is held by JLC Advisors LLP.
- The first and second defendants own a house valued between $30 to $40 million.
- Income earning contracts for vessel management were cancelled.
5. Formal Citations
- Parakou Shipping Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Liu Cheng Chan and others, Suit No 434 of 2014 (Summons No 2012 of 2014), [2014] SGHC 244
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Third and fourth defendants took over the plaintiff from the first and second defendants. | |
Galsworthy received the arbitration award in its favour. | |
Arbitrators delivered the second award on quantum awarding a sum of US$45m to Galsworthy. | |
Plaintiff commenced proceedings in this suit against the defendant and applied for a freezing order. | |
Summons was served on the plaintiff. | |
Interim injunction granted pending the inter partes hearing of the summons. | |
Parties returned for the inter parte arguments. | |
Judgment reserved. |
7. Legal Issues
- Risk of Asset Dissipation
- Outcome: The court found a real risk of asset dissipation.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Freezing order
9. Cause of Actions
- No cause of actions
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
- Arbitration
11. Industries
- Shipping
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Liquidation
- Freezing order
- Asset dissipation
- Arbitration award
- Interim injunction
15.2 Keywords
- Shipping
- Liquidation
- Freezing order
- Asset dissipation
- Arbitration
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Winding Up | 90 |
Dissipation of Assets | 80 |
Injunctions | 75 |
Company Law | 60 |
Corporate Restructuring | 55 |
Bankruptcy | 50 |
Commercial Disputes | 40 |
Business Litigation | 30 |
Arbitration | 30 |
16. Subjects
- Shipping
- Insolvency
- Arbitration